You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Ultimatum not acceptable: Rafsanjani
2008-07-26
You get the idea that the Mad Mullahs™ really mean it when they say 'no deal', and all the bloviating in the world by Javier Solana and the EU3 won't change a thing except give the Mullahs time to build a bomb and a missile delivery system.
TEHERAN - Former Iranian president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani yesterday said that Teheran would not accept any ultimatum in the talks on its nuclear programme. “We have agreed to talk (with the world powers) on the issue for finding a settlement (in the nuclear dispute) and are indeed hopeful to do so,” Rafsanjani said at a Friday prayer congregation in Teheran. “But again they (world powers) come up with ultimatums, timetables and even threats which are unacceptable for Iran,” added the moderate cleric who is one of the most vehement critics of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The five United Nations Security Council member states plus Germany have given Iran a two-week deadline to either accept suspension of uranium enrichment - and in return avail itself of Western economic and political incentives - or face further financial sanctions.

Ahmadinejad on Wednesday rejected the demand and called on the veto powers “to accept realities” and acknowledge Iran’s right to pursue nuclear projects, including uranium enrichment.

“We are ready to remove all international concerns and negotiations are the best framework to do so, and to prove that Iran’s nuclear projects are peaceful and that Iran would never be after acquiring weapons of mass destruction due to religious obligations,” Rafsanjani said.

The cleric added that during the 1980-1988 war with Iraq, although the regime of former Iraq president Saddam Hussein used toxic gas against Iranian forces, Teheran refrained from reciprocating and utilised just internationally acknowledged methods of warfare.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Darth,

Read about the USSR penal battalions in WWII.
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2008-07-26 12:27  

#3  Of course you can't accept it. Your Parsi ego would explode.

Teheran refrained from reciprocating and utilized just internationally acknowledged methods of warfare.

No you didn't. Human wave attacks with 10 year old boys out in front to set off the mines is NOT an internationally acknowledged method of warfare.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-07-26 08:42  

#2  Looks a bit like Benny Hill.
Posted by: Lumpy Cheack3231   2008-07-26 05:38  

#1  Definitely cruisin' for a bruisin'. There's just no talking to these bozos. Never has been any point. I doubt anyone can point to any actual benefit ever achieved through negotiations with them, other than a few cosmetic or appearances-only variations on their SOP.
Posted by: Brian H   2008-07-26 01:46  

00:00