You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
House Homeland Security Committee's staff said to be in turmoil
2008-07-17
Democratic and Republican congressional aides say there is turmoil within the the House Homeland Security Committee's majority staff and that oversight work is being eclipsed by a focus on promoting contracting opportunities for small and minority-owned businesses.

Sources who spoke only if they could remain anonymous said they are particularly concerned that the committee's new staff director, I. Lanier Avant, does not have the qualifications to lead the committee and faces a conflict of interest because he continues to serve as chief of staff in the congressional office of House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.

They expressed concern that Avant must balance his duties on Thompson's personal staff, which includes attention to politics and fundraising, and managing the heavy responsibilities of running the committee, which he began doing last month.

Avant does not have a security clearance. Sources said that raises questions about his ability to make decisions on issues involving classified information.

Speaking candidly with CongressDaily, Avant said he does "the bulk of [Thompson's] political work." But the 30-year-old aide said he knows the line between his jobs.
Wonderful. Just fricking wonderful. The Dems put a 30 yr old neophyte in charge of a key homeland security committee's work.
It is not a violation of House rules for one aide to serve as chief of staff and committee staff director for a lawmaker. The majority staff director of the House Small Business Committee, for example, heads Small Business Chairwoman Nydia Velazquez's personal office.

But sources said the arrangement with Avant has made Thompson's agenda of reaching out and helping small, minority-owned and disadvantaged businesses secure homeland security contracts the overriding focus of the committee staff. Not enough attention has been paid to broader national security matters, the sources said.

Thompson created an electronic newsletter, Business Opportunities at DHS, which includes an e-mail address -- DHSBizOps@mail.house.gov -- that small and disadvantaged businesses can use to tell the committee if they feel they are being treated unfairly by the department. "Their Web site is selling themselves as people who give out contracts at DHS," one source said. "This is all misusing resources as far as I'm concerned."

The Democratic staff has been holding a series of nonpublic morning meetings in the committee's office with top executives from several companies. The staff also has organized public technology fairs and held its first so-called diversity roundtable last month.
I've worked in small/disadvantaged businesses. They have their place, which nearly all the time is NOT at the center of cutting edge technology.

RTWT if your blood pressure's pretty good beforehand.
Posted by:lotp

#2  Anonymoose, if only!

Once you establish a another bureaucracy or agency in DC, you play hell getting rid of it. Look at the Dept. of Education. Reagan even ran for President on getting rid of it as one of his first acts. Same with HUD and HHS. They only get stronger. The chairman of the oversight committee and the appropriations committee that Homeland Security comes under will never give up that power. And don't be surprised that I. Lanier Avant gets a security clearance even if his brother is an AQ associate or his girlfriend is Hizbollah.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2008-07-17 16:48  

#1  I think that much of Homeland Security is going to dissolve with the departure of President Bush, in that for all practical purposes it is redundant, ineffectual and annoying. Its very name has always grated, and its job performance, as such, was not good.

What little it has to show in success is due to the integration of preexisting agencies merged with it. Most likely it will become just an administrative headquarters, an extra tier bureaucracy over the other bureaucracies.

Or, as these things are sometimes called, "a dead raccoon under the porch."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-07-17 09:49  

00:00