You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
D.C. Guns Legal, Just Nearly Impossible to Get
2008-07-15
District officials will begin accepting applications for hand gun permits in a few days, but the nation's capital will still have the most restrictive gun laws in the nation.

D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty, D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier and D.C. Acting Attorney General Peter Nickles unveiled the emergency legislation and regulations to repeal the city's ban on handguns on Monday.

There are four main components to the proposed legislation:

1. D.C. will continue to ban handguns in most places, with the exception of use in the home for immediate self-defense purposes. Sawed-off shotguns, machine guns and short-barreled rifles are still prohibited.

2. D.C. Police will need to perform a ballistics test on all hand guns to determine if the gun is stolen or has been used in a crime.

3. Guns in the home must be stored unloaded and either disassembled or secured with a trigger lock or in a gun safe -- except in cases of "reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm."
4. D.C. residents who legally register handguns will not be required to have licenses to carry them in their home.

Nickles says the most controversial restrictions will be the ban on semi-automatics and the requirement to keep a trigger lock on the gun. "We expect a lot of public input," Nickles says. "We probably expect also a lawsuit."

Applicants will have to take a written test, be fingerprinted and undergo a background check before they can take a gun home. It's unlikely that stand alone gun stores will be allowed to open, and people may need to re-register their guns annually.
Posted by:Bobby

#13  I can't stand this town. Time to move.
Posted by: eltoroverde   2008-07-15 22:25  

#12  Washington weenies.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-07-15 19:03  

#11  #3 and #1 are not compatible. If your gun is stored unloaded, disassembled or has a trigger lock, you could die before your firearm does you much good. If you are a law-abiding citizen you ought to be able to carry concealed, period. Thugs and criminals are not much inhibited by firearm laws.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-07-15 19:00  

#10  Wow. All those hoops to enjoy a fundamental right. Imagine if an abortion required 1/10th of the effort.
Posted by: Iblis   2008-07-15 18:37  

#9  OS is right. Driving on a state road is a privelege. Owning a firearm is a right - big difference. I don't need to take a test. We banned the written testing of voters as it was an infringement on their right (not sure if I agree w/that now in practice for a lot of idiots but the principle remains).
Posted by: Broadhead6   2008-07-15 11:54  

#8  the height of petty bitchiness on the part of these loons...they rightfully get their ass kicked in the RKBA debate by SCOTUS and then want to do the lawfare bit to make it a total pain in the arse to attempt to get a firearm - total B.S.

Mayor Fenty/Chief Lanier & AG Nickles have no common sense.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2008-07-15 11:51  

#7  Nope. Not good enough. Try again.

example: #2 - ballistics test unwarranted, the gun has a serial number.

#3 - specifically disallowed by the court. Next.
Posted by: mojo   2008-07-15 10:54  

#6  If I ran things in D.C., I'd be afraid of an armed citizenery, too.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2008-07-15 09:36  

#5  The only way, peacefully, to get this resolved is to haul all involved before a federal grand jury for civil rights violations and conspiracy and MAKE IT STICK. No plea bargaining. Be assured it will have a broad effect on other jurisdictions.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-07-15 09:06  

#4  Hell our governor is ready to let you pack heat in the airport.

Gov. Sonny Perdue said Monday that he believes guns should be allowed in the nonsecure areas of Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, but said the issue is likely to be settled in court.

Perdue said his "lay opinion" is that a new state law allows guns in the airport's parking lots, atrium and all areas before the security gates
Posted by: Beavis   2008-07-15 09:06  

#3  3. Guns in the home must be stored unloaded and either disassembled or secured with a trigger lock or in a gun safe -- except in cases of "reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm."

FAIL

Didn't these arrogant a-holes read the supreme court decision that said storage requirements and disassembely/trigger-locks are UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

Same goes for banning semi-auto pistols.

ANd the annual reregistration is also probably unconstitutional as well.

When will these morons finally understand that this is a RIGHT not a privelege?



Posted by: OldSpook   2008-07-15 08:53  

#2  This is also the jurisdiction that wants to solve crime in one neighborhood by 'cordon, stop and question'.

Also the jurisdiction with one of the highest ratio of law enforcement personnel to citizens.

Also a jurisdiction with a very high murder rate.

Also a jurisdiction where about 75% of all the murder victims have a felony conviction.
Posted by: mhw   2008-07-15 08:28  

#1  D.C. Guns Legal, Just Nearly Impossible to Get(Legally)
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-07-15 07:41  

00:00