You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Al Qaeda not in Iraq but in Pakistan, says genius pol
2008-07-07
An influential Democratic lawmaker who backs Senator Barack Obama for the Presidency has said the al Qaeda is not in Iraq but in Pakistan where the US administration should focus.

'Al Qaida is not waiting for our electoral cycle or inauguration. If they have an opportunity to strike, they will strike. And that is why I think we have to take steps today, and that is why I was very pleased when Senator Obama called for much more aggressive action in Pakistan,' Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island said.

There, Al Qaida is reconstituting itself. If they have the operational space and they have the time, they will develop plans, and it's not with respect to the new administration. It's when they think they can strike and be effective at catastrophic attacks, he said on ABC's 'This Week' programme.

'I think Senator Obama has demonstrated the insight he has on strategy by saying, let's focus on the real enemies, the ones that are attacking us and plan to attack us here in the United States. They're not in Iraq. They're probably more likely in Pakistan. And I think that's the area that we have to focus on. The administration has to do that now,' he added.

Reed also used the occasion to slam the presumptive Republican nominee Senator John McCain for being 'fundamentally wrong' on Iraq.

'I think Senator McCain has not been consistently right. He's been fundamentally wrong on the strategy.

'A pre-emptive unilateral attack in Iraq has, I think, had unfortunate consequences strategically. We see the Iranians growing in influence and power in the region. And much of that is attributed to the initial decision to conduct military operations, unilateral operations in Iraq,' the lawmaker added.
Posted by:Fred

#5  What an idiot. The very fact that absurd statements like his can be made without public derision and political consequences is very disturbing and depressing. So this genius has a military background, right? Something tells me he wouldn't be your first choice to lecture at a staff college.

So, which "steps" do we have to take today, Gen. Patton? As in, steps we're not taking today? And how - you moron - would letting up as we're about to finish off AQIZ help "strategically"? After you've explained that, WTF is this word "unilateral" you keep using as though it's got some relevance? Sen. Reed, military veteran and super-genius, please list, in alphabetical order, the major military operations undertaken by western or Free World countries since WWII where the US was not the dominant, without-which-it-doesn't-happen element?

Oh, and please note, the KIA from the UK, Poland, El Salvador, Italy, Bulgaria, and several other countries (not to mention the thousands of Iraqi soldiers/police who've stepped up in the most difficult circumstances) send you a hearty "f**k you" from the grave ....
Posted by: Verlaine   2008-07-07 11:44  

#4  Jack is making a key mistake. He is exposing himself to people who didn't know he existed.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-07-07 11:39  

#3  Jack Reed is influential? Since when?
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-07-07 10:44  

#2  Apparently Jack Reed will sponsor a "sense of the Senate" motion to support attacking Pakland?


Didn't think so....
Posted by: Frank G   2008-07-07 08:38  

#1  C'mon, we all knew the Dems would find some way to say that McCain was wrong on the war. I (speaking for myself) am just so dumb I couldn't see how they could do so...

So is BO gonna invade Pakistan, unilaterally, or persuade them to permit a 'soft' invasion?
Posted by: Bobby   2008-07-07 05:59  

00:00