You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Your U.N. at Work
2008-06-07
The General Assembly of the United Nations voted this week to elect Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann as its new president. Readers with a long memory will recall Father D'Escoto (he's a Catholic priest) as Nicaragua's foreign minister during the Sandinista regime of the 1980s. He's also the winner of the 1985 Lenin Prize. Only at the U.N. does that count as a recommendation.

The U.N. also voted to name the government of Burma – which otherwise has been busy preventing humanitarian assistance from reaching hundreds of thousands of its own needy victims of last month's devastating cyclone – as one of the Assembly's vice presidents. Only at the U.N. is this not considered an embarrassment.

If that weren't enough, a U.S. official was present for the vote – which was by acclamation – when the U.S. could have at least protested the choice with an empty seat. Nor did the State Department make any effort to offer an alternative to Father d'Escoto, who ran unopposed. Somehow, we don't think this would have happened had John Bolton still been ambassador.

Speaking after his election, Father d'Escoto called for greater "democracy" at the U.N. – an odd remark coming from a former servant of a communist dictatorship. He also called for the U.N. to take a stand against "acts of aggression, such as those occurring in Iraq and Afghanistan." That would be American aggression, not the Taliban's, the Mahdi Army's or al Qaeda's.

A former Lenin Prize winner as General Assembly president and cruel Burma as vice president – another sick joke from the U.N.
Posted by:ryuge

#3  I appreciate you telling me that, Rambler. I hadn't yet found Rantburg then, so I was horribly oblivious to things. ;-) Now I won't be so silly next time, my dear, which is one of the things I love about the people here.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-06-07 22:37  

#2  tw, in 1980 Pope John Paul II declared that priests may not serve in political office. The declaration was aimed at people like D'Escoto. It also affected Father Drinan, who was a congressman from Massachusetts. Fr. Drinan resigned from Congress rather than give up his priesthood. I don't know if the ban included appointed office like Foreign Minister or being elected president of the general assembly of the UN.
So it may be that Mr D'Escoto is already no longer a priest. Or else he is ignoring the Pope.
Posted by: Rambler in California   2008-06-07 17:22  

#1  If he's a Catholic priest, it's up to his hierarchy, and ultimately the pope, to rein him in. All they need do is give him a choice between retiring to a monastery for a decade or two of contemplation, or leaving the priesthood. Father D'Escoto wouldn't have nearly the appeal were he merely Mister D'Escoto from Nicuragua. There are lots of other Sandanistas lying about, along with Khmer Rouge, Shining Pathers and Al Qaeda-niks.

Well, ok, the Al Qaeda-niks are either in hiding or dead, but the point still holds.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-06-07 13:58  

00:00