Such rhetoric seems to vindicate President Bill Clinton’s charge that there are “purveyors of hate and division” on U.S. airwaves who “leave the impression, by their very words, that violence is acceptable.” Clinton was roundly condemned by right-wing talk radio hosts and their allies for “politicizing” the Oklahoma City bombing, but his basic point is undeniable: There is much speech on the radio today that advocates or justifies violence.

The fact that Fox News intentionally wants people to confuse the Illinois Sen and Presidential candidate with the terrorist Osama Bin Ladin (someone whose capture and death many Americans have fantasized about) and then, on public airwaves, openly wish for violence against the Senator - Are they trying to encourage someone to kill Obama? Are they openly inciting violence? IsnÂ’t that against the law - like yelling fire in a crowded theater?

BLAMING HILLARY IF OBAMA IS ASSASSINATED: "Approaching June, my prayers for Barack ObamaÂ’s safety have indeed become a daily plea. IÂ’m not a big prayer guy, but I had no idea Hillary Clinton would make that necessary for my own peace of mind." I think that's unfair, as is blaming Rush Limbaugh for Timothy McVeigh.

Getting linked to by Instapundit is always a creepy feeling. You want the traffic - his minions click on whatever he tells them to, like brainless link zombies. The problem is that the minions are, in fact, brainless zombies. . . . I mean, IÂ’d like to engage with a blatant GOP blogger, who says he voted for Bill Clinton twice, on an issue that any self-respecting law professor would have some intellectual thought on, but it appears that Glenn Reynolds has no intellect, or thought, to provide. HeÂ’d rather parrot whatever Fox News tells him to, an example which his readers follow, largely because itÂ’s the only way these people have ever learned how to engage in political discourse. He leads, they follow. Which I guess proves the point of my original post, doesnÂ’t it?