| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Obama: Stealth Socialist? |
| 2008-05-24 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #14 No McCain is a lying sack of untrustworthy shit (see border policy and his recent backstab). He gave his word and now is throwing it away. Dishonorable. Dishonest. Egotistical. Stupid Stubborn. John McCain is all of the above. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2008-05-24 23:22 |
| #13 huh? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2008-05-24 22:07 |
| #12 McCain is a communist! Did ya hear?! |
| Posted by: Crolusing tse Tung2778 2008-05-24 21:28 |
| #11 McCain is a communist! Did ya hear?! |
| Posted by: Crolusing tse Tung2778 2008-05-24 21:28 |
| #10 tu, you beat me to it. |
| Posted by: jds 2008-05-24 19:02 |
| #9 Ain't no stealth about it. Actually, I'd say communist. And he thinks he's the one more equal than others. |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-05-24 18:45 |
| #8 He is quite openly socialist - read his book, look at who he associates himself with. The only way he is "stealth" is the press is shoveling as fast as ti can to hide him, and ignoring and stonewalling everything that goes against the liberal narrative (c.f. coverage of Feiths book). |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2008-05-24 15:32 |
| #7 Stealth? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2008-05-24 12:31 |
| #6 The inevitable clash of cultures between fifth column communist tribalists and western civilization. It's been playing out in colonized Africa, ie, Kenya, Zimbabwe and South Africa for decades. Senator Obama carries a new flag, that of the second "invisible empire." The next few years should be very interesting. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2008-05-24 08:29 |
| #5 Even 'conservatives' like Rush have kept using the term 'liberal' for decades to describe pols and their followers who have been and are nothing more than socialist. They've always been socialist. They've just been very effective in conning everyone in to accepting the term liberal. So what's the big surprise in calling the bulk of the Donks exactly what they are, to include their front runners, Socialist? They are and have been. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-05-24 07:50 |
| #4 Does this headline really need a question mark? |
| Posted by: regular joe 2008-05-24 07:34 |
| #3 I think you need to look to the UK to see the damage that "Zanu Labour" have done here. They are not really "socialist"* any more, more a sort of entitlement to rule and run others lives. *Not that socialism would work, they know it doesn't work, but they can't abandon the urge to meddle with things they don't understand. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2008-05-24 07:29 |
| #2 No. fubama is a socialist (with a cult of personality) and hillarity is a communist (with cogs in the machine). To me, its the King of Hearts card - both of them fancy themselves as rulers of the underclass, both faces on the same side of the card, but are they committing suicide or brandishing weapons against each other? Historically they have never got along, yet each continues to rack up major obvious blunders in their campaign to rule. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2008-05-24 03:24 |
| #1 In your face socialist, stealth communist. |
| Posted by: Spike Uniter 2008-05-24 00:52 |