You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Iraq
Ayatollah al-Sistani Fatwahs For Iraq Jihad? Prob'ly not.
2008-05-24
See the story above, dug up by the Gateway Pundit (who does strong work and is a must-read for me every day), for more details.
Powerful Iraqi cleric flirting with Shiite militant message

BAGHDAD (AP) — Iraq's most influential Shiite cleric has been quietly issuing religious edicts declaring that armed resistance against U.S.-led foreign troops is permissible — a potentially significant shift by a key supporter of the Washington-backed government in Baghdad.
Most Iraqi Parliamentarians are empowered by al-Sistani's support. What if he orders them to support jihad against US soldiers?
Then he'll be living in Iran, and most of his supporters will be dead or in hiding. And I think they all know that ...
The edicts, or fatwas, by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani suggest he seeks to sharpen his long-held opposition to American troops and counter the populist appeal of his main rivals, firebrand Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army militia.

But — unlike al-Sadr's anti-American broadsides — the Iranian-born al-Sistani has displayed extreme caution with anything that could imperil the Shiite-dominated government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The two met Thursday at the elderly cleric's base in the city of Najaf south of Baghdad.

So far, al-Sistani's fatwas have been limited to a handful of people. They also were issued verbally and in private — rather than a blanket proclamation to the general Shiite population — according to three prominent Shiite officials in regular contact with al-Sistani as well as two followers who received the edicts in Najaf.

All spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.
They spoke anonymously because they don't know what they're talking about. This story doesn't pass the smell test for a simple reason: for his entire life, and certainly since Saddam was removed, Sistani has said that there is a civil sphere and a religious sphere: he's in the latter and won't be dragged into the former. He doesn't make or pronounce policy, he doesn't interfere with the government, and doesn't take sides in public. For him to issue a fatwa now would be completely out of character for him.
Al-Sistani — who is believed to be 79 or 80 — has not been seen in public since a brief appearance in August 2004, shortly after returning from London for medical treatment for an unspecified heart condition. But his mix of religious authority and political clout makes him more powerful than any of Iraq's elected leaders.

For American officials, he represents a key stabilizing force in Iraq for refusing to support a full-scale Shiite uprising against U.S.-led forces or Sunnis — especially at the height of sectarian bloodletting after an important Shiite shrine was bombed in 2006.

It is impossible to determine whether those who received the edicts acted on them. Most attacks — except some by al-Qaida in Iraq — are carried out without claims of responsibility. It is also unknown whether al-Sistani intended the fatwas to inspire violence or simply as theological opinions on foreign occupiers. Al-Sadr — who has a much lower clerical rank than al-Sistani — recently has threatened "open war" on U.S.-led forces...
Posted by:McZoid

#5  AP becoming a propaganda mouthpiece due to its reporters' bias (they beleive anythign anti-US), and cowrdcie (They refuse to get out there like Michal Yon or Totten, replying on "stringers" instead).
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-24 10:29  

#4  Maybe Sisanti should issue a Fatwa against journalists that lie and try to create civil war.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-05-24 09:55  

#3  We bad! :-)
Posted by: gorb   2008-05-24 02:48  

#2  Origin: AP stringers

Status: Busted!
Posted by: Spike Uniter   2008-05-24 01:32  

#1  So far, al-Sistani's fatwas have been limited to a handful of people. They also were issued verbally and in private — rather than a blanket proclamation to the general Shiite population — according to three prominent Shiite officials in regular contact with al-Sistani as well as two followers who received the edicts in Najaf.

Grounds for potential BS alert? Sounds like three prominent Shiite officials and two followers might be angling for greater political power.
Posted by: gorb   2008-05-24 01:12  

00:00