You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
"More must be done to avoid Afghan deaths": UNHRC
2008-05-16
KABUL - Afghan forces, international troops and Taliban insurgents need to do more to avoid civilian casualties or many more innocents will be killed in the ongoing conflict, a U.N. rights expert said on Thursday.

U.N. Human Rights Council (UNHRC) special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions ...
... they have titles like that? ...
... Philip Alston said the level of complacency over civilian killings was "staggeringly" high and a great many deaths could be avoided. "The bottom line of my report is that there are many killings which are avoidable," he told a news conference at the end of a 12-day visit to Afghanistan.
Thanks Phil. Say, any thoughts about asking the Taliban to be more careful when they terrorize civilians?
Some 200 civilians have been killed by international and Afghan forces so far this year, he said, while Taliban insurgents have killed around 300 in the same period.

Alston called for more accountability from the more than 50,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan, who together with Afghan government troops are engaged in daily battles with a resurgent Taliban mainly in the south and east of the country. While he said he had found no evidence of intentional killing by foreign troops and particular cases were investigated at considerable length, no international force was able or willing to provide information on numbers of civilians killed, the results of investigations or whether anyone had been punished.
Because we don't want to do body counts. One reason why is people like you ...
"At the very least what the international forces have on their hands is a public relations disaster," he said. "They have not taken the steps which are necessary at the political level to ensure a degree of transparency and accountability in relation to the casualties."

"This is a very major political issue because the support of both the people of Afghanistan and the international community is dependant upon a sense that the international forces are doing what they think the people of Afghanistan should be doing; being held to account," Alston said.

The problem of accountability, he said, was exacerbated by the operations of forces who were not accountable to any military but appeared to be controlled by foreign intelligence services.

Alston said the Afghan police should be better trained, equipped, and monitored and called for an end to corruption within the force and the impunity that the police generally enjoy after they have been accused of killing civilians. Corruption was also rife in the judicial process, Alston said, calling for a moratorium on the death penalty: "The judicial process is not of a sufficient standard to ensure that any of those executed have been afforded due process."

Some 95 percent of those killed by the Taliban were innocent civilians, Alston said, but while this was a "disaster", rights activists should seek to engage the insurgents.
Well, at least he considers it a 'disaster'. That's more than we usually get.
He said he had wanted to talk to representatives of the Taliban but the Afghan government had said there should be no dialogue with the rebels over human rights issues. "I consider this to be a mistake," he said. "I reject the claim that such discussions legitimise the Taliban. ...
... sure, and having a UN special wrapper talking with the Talibunnies offers them no legitimacy at all, nope, nope ....
.. The Taliban exist, they are engaged in widespread killing and we have an obligation ... to seek to diminish the civilian casualties and killings," he said.
We're doing that, thankyouverymuch, by killing the Talibunnies. We'll let you know if we need your help, 'k?
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Ummm.... we'll get back to ya. Risk/Benefit analysis was skewed out of normal parameters...experts have been called in
Posted by: Frank G   2008-05-16 21:23  

#6  domyall think i could get like an Ambasador for a day just so i could stand up and telll the Un too fuck off
Posted by: sinse   2008-05-16 19:58  

#5  "The bottom line of my report is that there are many killings which are avoidable."

Ummm, missed the article yesterday where executing one murderer prevented 3 to 8 further murders, didn't you?
Killing terrorists is a public health measure, not a fault
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-05-16 13:33  

#4  Funny how these progressive tranzies never bother to let the splodeydopes in on their violence reduction ideas.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-05-16 10:21  

#3  "The bottom line of my report is that there are many killings which are avoidable."

Apparently the difference between your garden variety rapporteur and a “special” rapporteur is that the latter isn’t required to provide…uhem…“evidence” in making their projections
Posted by: DepotGuy   2008-05-16 09:18  

#2  I think Phil is volunteering for a parachute jump into Helmand provice, with a Blue Helmet, to address the problem first-hand.

What, no 'chutes? A twofer!
Posted by: Bobby   2008-05-16 05:49  

#1  Yah, UN; just like you protected minorities in Rwanda.
Posted by: McZoid   2008-05-16 04:25  

00:00