You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
House blocks Iraq war money and sets pullout plan
2008-05-16
The House of Representatives, in a surprise and largely symbolic move, defeated legislation on Thursday to fund the war in Iraq for another year. But it also sent the Senate a controversial troop-withdrawal plan that will give that chamber an opportunity to restore the money for waging the conflict, which is deeply unpopular with the public.

With a large group of anti-war Democrats voting against giving the Pentagon $162.5 billion to keep fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through mid-2009, the House defeated the measure by a vote of 149-141.

Meanwhile, 132 Republicans voted "present" -- meaning neither "yes" nor "no" -- on the legislation, which brought another difficult debate about U.S. war policy just as the presidential and congressional elections are heating up and Republicans fear large losses in November.

Some Republicans said they were protesting the way Democrats brought the legislation to the House floor without House Appropriations Committee consideration. Most Republicans support the money for the war and oppose timetables for pulling troops out of Iraq.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, a Maryland Democrat, told reporters he expects the Senate to restore the war funding and give House Republicans another chance to approve it.

The White House has issued a veto threat against setting dates for withdrawing U.S. combat troops from Iraq as part of a war-funding bill. President George W. Bush vetoed such a measure a year ago.
Posted by:Fred

#4  The House of Representatives, in a surprise and largely symbolic move

I don't think this is the House's first symbolic move on war funding. Each time they've lost. I don't have the energy to get upset about stupid symbolism any more.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-05-16 14:20  

#3  Right now, there are barely enough contrary votes to stimey the Dummocrats stupidity and cowardice. The loss of even ten House seats will allow the madness to go forward. Can you imagine what 4 years of mayhem under these fools could create ? Idiot Feinstein even injected some pet project about allowing slave workers for her buddies in the Central Valley to this, a war funding proposal. Why did the wimp, Horseface Harry, allow this to be stuck to an appropriations bill ? The Dummocrats demonstrate daily that they are simply too stooopid to govern. They are not a legitimate party at all. They are simply a collection of fools and buffoons.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2008-05-16 10:55  

#2  This was a "clever" move by the trunks to be able to ask 149 asses why they voted to defund the troops when they claim to support them. The trunks are going to need a lot more than that. The next 4 years are going to be really bad.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-05-16 09:27  

#1  We aare WINNING this thing, and they are trying to lose it, make a bigger mess, one which we will have to go back in and clean up at far greater losses.

Stupid bastards. What is wrong with them?

Hang them all for treason.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-16 08:55  

00:00