You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Russia holds military parade to mark victory day
2008-05-10
Posted by:Fred

#3  The US and the British Empire, surely. My father spent some time camped on the Persian side of the Russian border as a translator for the British Army.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-05-10 22:32  

#2  Yes, but without having been propped-up materially by the allied (read the USA), russia never would have been able to withstand the german onslaught. And don't forget, this aid was (pragmatically) going to a former ALLY of the nazis that would have stayed so for some more time, hadn't they been foolishly attacked by hitler. Russians certainly weren't the "good guys" in WWII... yet ultimately they were its greatest victors, that's very unfair, in some way (though that could be discussed, if one takes the bleeding out of the population into account, from which, added to the devastation of the revolution, civil war and terror, it never recovered).
Posted by: anonymous5089   2008-05-10 12:03  

#1  Let's face it. Russia bore the brunt of the war against the Nazis. I fear that if the Germans had been able to effect a negotiated settlement much less out-right victory in the East the Western Allies would of never been able to defeat Germany having to invade across the Channel short of employing nuclear weapons
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2008-05-10 10:52  

00:00