You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Hussein's Terrorism Links
2008-05-02
In his April 25 Washington Sketch column, "Iraq War Is Everyone Else's Fault, Feith Explains," Dana Milbank asserted that the "CIA was correct" that there were no links between al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. The historical record tells a different story.

In 2002, then-CIA Director George Tenet wrote in a letter to Bob Graham (D-Fla.), then chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, that "our understanding of the relationship between Iraq and al-Qa'ida is evolving" and "we have solid reporting of senior level contacts between Iraq and al-Qa'ida going back a decade."

A March 2008 report by the U.S. Joint Forces Command included information about the relationship between Hussein and Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden's second in command: "Saddam supported groups either associated directly with al Qaeda (such as the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, led at one time by bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri) or that generally shared al Qaeda's stated goals and objectives."

Critics of the war in Iraq often try to minimize -- if not dismiss -- the links between Saddam Hussein and terrorists. As they say, facts are stubborn things.

JON KYL
U.S. Senator (R-Ariz.)
Letter to the editor in today's WaPo. As an Arizona resident, I am thankful for the exceptional representation we have had in the Senate.
Posted by:ryuge

#4  I thought WMD argument was a sexed up deal by W that turned out to be a bad business move.

They already had 17 violations of UN HR 687/88 plus about 100 confirmed times when the iraqis shot sam's at our jets over the NF zone. Total justification for regime change. I hated when W started talking about the WMDs - made it a smoking gun situation vice the iron clad reasoning provided by the 1991 cease fire agreements.
Posted by: Snash Oppressor of the Mohammatans aka Broadhead6   2008-05-02 21:27  

#3  facts are stubborn things

But so are the lousy, loony, left-leaning, liberal losers of the media.
Posted by: Bobby   2008-05-02 11:56  

#2  With you completely Jim. The only, only, only reason I ever needed for the war was that Saddam Hussein was a genocidal thug-bastard who needed killin'. Weapons of mass destruction be damned, Saddam needed to go.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-05-02 11:09  

#1  I'm worn out with this, if you don't believe Hussein was a bastard, you're an idiot.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-05-02 08:46  

00:00