You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Zimbabwe Arms Ship Waits Off Luanda, Say Unionists
2008-05-02
The Chinese ship carrying weapons for Zimbabwe is anchored off Luanda and shows no sign of returning to China, says the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF). In a statement issued on Thursday, the ITF general secretary, David Cockroft, said the federation trusted that the vessel, the An Yue Jiang, was waiting only to refuel and "that no attempt will be made to land any of its cargo of arms."
Nobody honestly thought the Chinese would back down, did they?
The ITF said although there were 20 ships waiting to dock in Luanda ahead of the An Yue Jiang, "there is no guarantee that it will not be allowed in ahead of them, allowing it to arrive before or during tomorrow's national holiday in Angola."

The An Yue Jiang sailed for Angola 10 days ago after it was prevented from offloading its cargo, first in Durban, South Africa, and then in other ports on the east coast of Africa. In a news conference in Beijing on April 24, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Jiang Yu said that "according to my knowledge, [the] relevant Chinese company has decided to ship back the cargo that [it] was due to deliver to Zimbabwe." The An Yue Jiang is operated by the state-owned China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO).

Cockcroft said that neither COSCO nor the Chinese government had given "any definitive promise" not to offload weapons in Angola. He added: "We can promise that the world will be watching what happens next."

The ITF said its Angolan affiliated, the Federacao dos Sindicatos dos Trabalhadores dos Transportes e Comunicacoes de Angola (FSTTCA), had declared on Thursday its members would refuse to unload any arms bound for Zimbabwe from the ship.
Posted by:Steve White

#13  I heard from a Reliable Source™ that the seacocks are veddy veddy corroded below the waterline.......and they could give way if touched.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2008-05-02 17:51  

#12  Sounds to me like a great venue to test out our latest version of the limpet mine...
Posted by: Thaimble Scourge of the Pixies4707   2008-05-02 17:48  

#11  Heh, heh, heh...yeah. Give a letter of marque to some Somalian pirates and be done with the whole affair.
Posted by: gromky   2008-05-02 16:23  

#10  much as Im a free trader Steve, I will take overthrowing Mugabe over cheap clothes and toys. Call me an elitist.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-05-02 15:28  

#9  "The Chinese ship carrying weapons for Zimbabwe is anchored off Luanda"

Sitting target.

Since the Navy ceased using Pureto Rico teritory as a bombing/strafing range, seems to me that this is a good alternate choice. all those arms just 'might' 'splode.
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2008-05-02 14:29  

#8  Let Pirates take the Ship, then sink it, a clear two-fer.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-05-02 14:09  

#7  Trade Unionists Bad: won't unload Chinese ships in American ports.

Trade Unionists Good: won't unload a Chinese ship in Angolan ports.

So you take the good with the bad ...
Posted by: Steve White   2008-05-02 10:36  

#6  Trade Unionists, YAY!
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-05-02 10:27  

#5  Can you imagine the field day pirates would have on that ship?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-05-02 08:39  

#4  The weapons will get through, but only to protect Chi-com interests, not Mugabe's. The debt is irrelavent by now, imaginary. Anyway, who is Bob going to have a hondo with that 'he' needs all this gear, unarmed civilians, disgruntled Zambians, a regrouped RLI?
Posted by: rhodesiafever   2008-05-02 08:06  

#3  It'll be offloaded eventually, though Mugabe will have to pay extra for the Chinese 'effort'.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-05-02 01:24  

#2  Aren't there pirates in those waters? Perhaps there should be....
Posted by: Ebbusolet Oppressor of the Wee Folk7609   2008-05-02 00:34  

#1  hmmm possibly a "fire below decks, ship lost at sea" incident?
Posted by: Frank G   2008-05-02 00:32  

00:00