You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US, Iraqi troops kill 38 militants in Baghdad
2008-04-28
While Allan slept, U.S. and Iraqi troops killed 38 militants in fierce clashes with militants in Baghdad, including 22 who attacked a military checkpoint in a Shiite militia stronghold, the U.S. military said Monday.

Suspected Shiite extremists, apparently taking advantage of a sandstorm that blanketed the capital, attacked several checkpoints and hammered the U.S.-protected Green Zone in the fiercest salvo in weeks on Sunday. The sandstorm had grounded the American aircraft that normally prowl for launching teams.

The insurgents lobbed more rockets or mortar shells toward the Green Zone, housing the United States embassy and much of the Iraqi government on the west side of the Tigris River, on Monday morning. Alarms could be heard and the public address system in the area warned residents to take cover and stay away from windows.

The clashes on Sunday concentrated in Sadr City, the stronghold of the Mahdi Army, where American soldiers used Abrams main battle tanks to repel the attackers.
A little detail the bad guys forgot to account for.
The American and Iraqi soldiers came under attack "by a large group of criminals," the U.S. military said in a statement. Eight civilians were killed and 58 others were also injured in clashes in Sadr City since Sunday, local health officials said Monday.

On Sunday, the U.S. military had claimed success with operations that have effectively sealed off the southern section of Baghdad's Sadr City, a militia stronghold that is believed to be one of the prime launching sites for the Green Zone attacks.

The Green Zone has been regularly shelled since fighting broke out over a U.S.-backed government crackdown against militias that began in late March. American commanders have blamed what they call Iranian-backed Shiite factions they say have broken with a cease-fire imposed by al-Sadr in late August.

On Sunday, Al-Sadr's spokesman in the holy city of Najaf called the Shiite-led government's terms for ceasing the crackdown against the militias "illogical."

Salah al-Obeidi accused Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, himself a Shiite, of wanting to resolve the problem by force instead of dialogue. Chief among al-Maliki's demands announced Friday were that the militias surrender heavy weapons and hand over all wanted people.

Brig. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi, the Iraqi military spokesman for Baghdad operations, on Sunday said the government would maintain the crackdown.
Posted by:gorb

#8  The Iraqi opposition has neither the hardware nor the physical sanctuary to pull off an invasion.

I dunno, Zhang. What about Iran? Of course, I'd like to ask Hildebeast and Obama the same question.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2008-04-28 15:14  

#7  Remember who was in charge of the Congress when South Vietnam was left hanging. The promised support to South Vietnam vanished. This new batch have been longing for a new "Vietnam" to justify their lives.

Even if we leave, there's not going to be another Vietnam. Iraqi security forces aren't great, but they're good enough. North Vietnam needed billions of dollars of shiny new tanks, artillery and fighter aircraft from the Chinese and the Soviets to finish off a South Vietnam to which we had cut off access to military supplies. The Iraqi opposition has neither the hardware nor the physical sanctuary to pull off an invasion. If we leave, and the situation gets out of hand, expect the Iraqi government to resort to massacres, given that they are literally fighting for their lives.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2008-04-28 13:52  

#6  including 22 who attacked a military checkpoint in a Shiite militia stronghold

Sounds like they're trying to break out of an encirclement. How long before they start getting hungry and running low on ammo?
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2008-04-28 13:15  

#5  Sorry folks. My browser did a hang & I submitted twice.
Posted by: tipover   2008-04-28 11:24  

#4  wxj; it is a smart idea if the Repubs DON'T hold the WH as the Iraqi's need to get as much done as they can before a Democrat declares surrender and leaves them hanging (literally).

Remember who was in charge of the Congress when South Vietnam was left hanging. The promised support to South Vietnam vanished. This new batch have been longing for a new "Vietnam" to justify their lives.
Posted by: tipover   2008-04-28 11:22  

#3  wxj; it is a smart idea if the Repubs DON'T hold the WH as the Iraqi's need to get as much done as they can before a Democrat declares surrender and leaves them hanging (literally).

Remember who was in charge of the Congress when South Vietnam was left hanging. The promised support to South Vietnam vanished. This new batch have been longing for a new "Vietnam" to justify their lives.
Posted by: tipover   2008-04-28 11:12  

#2  May I add that Maliki has obviously cut Iranian influence in favor of US military presence and stability. A smart move if Republicans retain the White House.
Posted by: wxjames   2008-04-28 10:46  

#1  Points

1. They launch their main attacks while a sand storm denies coalition use of air support. These guys are NOT devoid of tactical sense

2. Despite that, no major damage reported in Green Zone. Pushing them out of south Sadr City may be working

3. And coalition forces continue to do well on the ground in Sadr city.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-04-28 09:42  

00:00