You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Al-Sadr shift: away from politics and favoring fight
2008-04-25
Muqtada al-Sadr is considering setting aside his political ambitions and restarting a full-scale fight against U.S.-led forces — a worrisome shift that may reflect Iranian influence on the young cleric and could open the way for a shadow state protected by his powerful Mahdi Army.

A possible breakaway path — described to The Associated Press by Shiite lawmakers and politicians — would represent the ultimate backlash to the Iraqi government's pressure on al-Sadr to renounce and disband his Shiite militia.

By snubbing the give-and-take of politics, al-Sadr would have a freer hand to carve out a kind of parallel state with its own militia and social services along the lines of Hezbollah in Lebanon, a Shiite group founded with Iran's help in the 1980s.

It also would carry potentially disastrous security implications as the Pentagon trims its troops strength and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki finally shows progress on national reconciliation.

Last week, the main Sunni political bloc announced provisional plans to rejoin the Shiite-led coalition nine months after quitting the government. The Sunnis are pleased with the squeeze on al-Sadr's movement as well as an amnesty law that could free many detainees. "Muqtada has shown a great deal of patience not calling for an all-out war yet with so much pressure on him," said Mohan Abedin, director of research at London's Center for the Study of Terrorism and an expert on Shiite affairs. "The Mahdi Army is by far the most powerful Iraqi faction. It can cause damage on a massive scale if it goes to war."

Al-Sadr's next move is still uncertain, but he clearly holds important cards. The Mahdi Army is estimated to have about 60,000 fighters — with at least 5,000 thought to be highly trained commandos — and is emboldened by its strong resistance to an Iraqi-led crackdown launched last month in the southern city of Basra and elsewhere.

Al-Sadr's movement also holds sway over the densely populated Shiite parts of Baghdad and across the Shiite south by controlling vital needs such as fuel and running social services such as clinics. A cease-fire declared last summer by al-Sadr has been credited with helping bring a steep drop violence.

But al-Sadr — who has been in the Iranian seminary city of Qom for the past year — is seriously considering tearing up the truce and disassociating himself from his political bloc in parliament, according to loyalists and Shiite politicians interviewed by the AP over the past two weeks.

Then al-Sadr would be free to unleash Mahdi attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces, the political insiders said. They include members of the 30-seat Sadrist faction in parliament and members of rival Shiite parties, including two who saw al-Sadr recently in Iran. All requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject. "The emphasis is now on weapons and fighting, not politics," said one of the lawmakers in the Sadrist bloc. "(Al-Sadr) now only communicates with the Mahdi Army commanders."

Any Mahdi Army offensive could have serious repercussions. Mahdi fighters engaged in fierce battles with U.S. forces in 2004 and then were blamed for waves of roadside bombings that were once the chief killer of American troops.

Mahdi militiamen also fought Iraqi security forces to a virtual standstill last month in Basra before an Iranian-supervised truce. It's unknown how much al-Sadr's Iranian hosts are shaping his views.

Al-Sadr, who lies about his age is in his mid-30s, is studying in Qom under the supervision of Ayatollah Kazim al-Haeri, a reclusive Iraqi cleric close to Iranian hard-liners. Washington accuses Iran of aiding Shiite militias in Iraq, including so-called "special groups" with murky ties to the Mahdi mainstream. Iran denies the allegations. But Iran has obvious and well known connections to the main Shiite political groups in al-Maliki's government. During the recent battles in Basra, Iran supported al-Maliki's crackdown on so-called "criminals" but did not make a clear statement on the spillover confrontation with the Mahdi Army.

Backing a Mahdi Army uprising would allow Tehran to effectively play both sides in a Shiite showdown.

A flurry of recent statements by al-Sadr has emphasized his first public role: as a firebrand militia leader after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. In a statement posted Saturday on his Web site, al-Sadr gave a "final warning" to the government to halt its crackdown or face an "open war until liberation."

Senior Mahdi Army commanders, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss strategy with media, said they have taken delivery of new Iranian weapons, including sophisticated roadside bombs, Grad rockets and shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles. The militia's top field commanders, they said, were senior members of the special groups. One commander, who identified himself by his nickname Abu Dhara al-Sadri, said scores of militia fighters were prepared to carry out suicide bombings against U.S. forces. Suicide bombings are the signature attacks of Sunni militants in Iraq's conflict, but the tactic was introduced against Americans in Lebanon by Shiite militants in the 1980s.

Sadrist lawmakers and aides have sent compromise-seeking proposals to al-Sadr in Qom. The ideas seek to appease al-Maliki enough to forestall his threat: barring al-Sadr's followers from running in this fall's key provincial elections unless al-Sadr disbands the Mahdi Army.

But the proposals have gone unanswered, said al-Sadr's aides. One offer, they said, would allow for creation of a new political party with no formal links to the Mahdi Army. Another would permit candidates sympathetic to the Sadrists — but with no direct links — to run as independents in the fall election. One of the authors of the proposals, moderate cleric Riyadh al-Nouri, was gunned down April 11 in Najaf, the spiritual center for Shiites in Iraq. The reason for the slaying was not clear.

Lawmakers and politicians told the AP that al-Sadr's more belligerent tone is motivated, in part, by his wish to secure a place for himself in history as a nationalist leader and anger over the recent arrests of hundreds of supporters despite his unilateral cease-fire.

At talks this month in Qom between al-Sadr and former Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, the young cleric vowed never to disband the Mahdi Army while U.S. and other foreign forces remain in Iraq, according to Shiite political figures familiar with the meetings.

Al-Jaafari has said he was mediating an accommodation between al-Sadr and al-Maliki's government.

Salah al-Obeidi, al-Sadr's chief spokesman in Iraq, acknowledged that al-Sadr and the Iranians were at present bound by close ties and common goals.

However, he was quick to add that while al-Sadr and the Iranians shared common interests — namely fighting the Americans in Iraq — the cleric was nobody's puppet.

Vali Nasr, an expert on Shiite politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, said the Iranians may want al-Sadr to stay in Qom to keep him in check for the moment. "Muqtada is forcing everyone's hand right now when they (the Iranians) may not be wanting their hand forced," said Nasr.
Posted by:Fred

#10  He should have been stomped to a sticky red jelly the first time he raised his ugly head.

Which is how martyrs are made.

Better to keep the incompetent, than to have someone with sense (and better teeth) show up.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-04-25 21:31  

#9  He should have been stomped to a sticky red jelly the first time he raised his ugly head. Now we have to do it again. This time, I don't think Tater's gonna survive. One heavy ARCLIGHT strike against his "forces" will leave him with a handful of useful idiots (democrats), and not much else.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2008-04-25 16:09  

#8  If he wants to be a "nationalist" leader, it might help his cause if he was actually in the nation that he wanted to lead instead of hiding under his bed at Super Duper Mullah School in Iran while his Mahdi Army saps do all his bleeding for him...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-04-25 13:42  

#7  Lawmakers and politicians told the AP that al-Sadr's more belligerent tone is motivated, in part, by his wish to secure a place for himself in history as a nationalist leader and anger over the recent arrests of hundreds of supporters despite his unilateral cease-fire.

'Nationalist leader'? More like a Prince of Thieves. Meaning he has to constantly work to keep control. Since he doesn't have charisma and a rep outside of being 'his father's son', and he hasn't effectively established a climate of fear, he needs to play warlord.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-04-25 13:28  

#6  I think the Mullahs have decided to throw Tater under the bus partly because he became too expensive (I shudder at the dental hygiene bill).

Those 60k 'fighters' won't be loyal when their pay stops; the 5k commandos will, at least for a while decide to use their skills to rob and extort from the Shia civilians in the name of Tater.

Posted by: mhw   2008-04-25 09:01  

#5  Even if he does have 60,000 fighters and 5,000 highly trained commandos (and I am doubtful of that), I think he's too late. The IA now outmans him and almost certainly out-skills him and out-commands him. And that's without US advisors and air cover. The only place he 'wins' is in ruthlessness, and if the US advisors 'turn their backs' I imagine the IA would have no problem frying some tater skins in hot oil.
Posted by: Menhadden Snogum6713   2008-04-25 08:51  

#4  And all the women wearing jeans and returning to the university and all the other folks quoted in The Times article would love to have Tater back.

Intentional or not, what has happenend is we have allowed the folks - and the rest of the world - to see what would have happened without the rule of law. First Falluja and now Basra have been freed again - first from the oppression of Sadam, then from the oppression of their we-know-what-is-best-for-you betters (the democrats?)

Why is he always a "young cleric", anyway?
Posted by: Bobby   2008-04-25 06:27  

#3  Typical MSM hysteria : all sorts of "could, might, may" being invoked without any explanation of how he is supposed to accomplish this with the losses the Mahdi Army has taken in the past few weeks. And a lot of those losses are surrenders/defections.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2008-04-25 02:45  

#2  Condi still thinks you're a pansy.

It also would carry potentially disastrous security implications as the Pentagon trims its troops strength and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki finally shows progress on national reconciliation.

I thought that Maliki going after Tater was the reason the government was starting to pull together.
Posted by: gorb   2008-04-25 01:44  

#1  As wid any Campaign-War in World History, THE ISLAMIST JIHAD WILL PROVE A FAILURE UNLESS RESPECT, CREDIBILITY, AND POWER CAN BE ACHIEVED ON PAR OR GREATER THAN OTHER GLOBAL COMPETITORS = GREAT NATION/POWER RIVALS INCLUD ALLIES. The OWG ISLAMIST-JIHADIST CALIPHATE OR STATE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED UNLESS RADICAL ISLAM INCLUD IRAN, PAKI, ETC. CAN DEMONS ITS POWER = POTENCY AGZ THE US-WEST, RUSSIA-CHINA, NATO, SCO, EU, etal. SINGULARLY ANDOR COLLECTIVELY.

IMO, Radical Islam - Iran, OBL, Sadr, etc. - are counting on DUBYA = LAME DUCK [per MSM], and on the US-COALITION/ALLIES to stay in Iraq-Afghani as well as to NOT undertake any sort of unilater milaction agz IRAN. THEY ARE CONTENTING THEMSELVES WID NUCLEAR IRAN DOMIN THE CENTRAL ASIAN, PERSIAN GULF, + NEAR EAST REGIONS = BLOC OF NUCLEARIZED MUSLIM NATIONS.

IOW, the POST 2010/12 NEW GLOBAL JIHAD + future GLOBAL CALIPHATE will begin as a NUCLEARIZED REGIONAL-LOCAL CALIPHATE as long as the USA either "stays in place", withdraws, or even just reduces its force presence in the ME. IT WON'T MATTER AS LONG AS MAJOR WORLD POWERS TAKE NO ACTION AGZ NUCLEAR IRAN - THE US PER SE CAN STAY IN IRAQ-AFGHANI AS LONG AS IT WANTS TO.

THE JIHAD WILL SURVIVE, PREVAIL, AND WAR AGAIN EXCEPT NOW IS NUCLEARIZED.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-04-25 00:46  

00:00