You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Dhimmis seek to avoid Iraq funding vote this fall
2008-04-19
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats in Congress, seeking to avoid a vote on funding the Iraq war during the fall campaign season, are likely to combine President Bush's two pending requests into a single bill to be voted on this spring. House Democratic aides said Thursday that Bush's $108 billion request to finance military and diplomatic operations in Iraq and Afghanistan through the Oct. 1 end of the 2008 budget year is likely to be combined with his $70 billion request to continue the war into the next president's term.

"You vote one time and get the money out of the way," said Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., chairman of the House panel responsible for the Pentagon budget. He cautioned that House leaders have not officially endorsed the idea.
Only thing I want from Murtha is an apology from him to the Marines ...
But votes on war funding bills inevitably generate tension among Democrats and unhappiness among their core supporters, who are strongly opposed to funding the war. That has leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., hoping to avoid a second vote in the fall.

Democrats are struggling behind-the-scenes to coordinate strategy for passing the war funding bill, a task made more difficult by a recent Bush threat to veto any domestic add-ons to the war funding measure that would bring its price tag above his request. D

emocrats are poised to defy the veto threat by adding to the Iraq funding bill a measure to significantly expand education benefits for veterans. The new GI bill, sponsored by Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., would greatly increase college education benefits for veterans to cover tuition and fees at most public universities. That would, on average, double college aid for veterans to about $12,000 per year at a cost of up to $4 billion a year under preliminary Congressional Budget Office estimates. The additional money for college aid for veterans has bipartisan support and could be difficult for Bush to stop in an election year.
And little reason why he would. But read on ...
But there's little agreement among Democrats on what other items unrelated to Iraq and Afghanistan to try to add to the war funding bill. Senate Democrats are considering up to $10 billion simply for infrastructure projects such as roads, bridge repairs and school construction. At an Appropriations Committee hearing Wednesday, Democratic senators pressed a multitude of other ideas: crime-fighting grants; overseas food aid; heating subsidies; funding to combat western wildfires; and heating subsidies for the poor to name just a few.
Using the war bill as a Christmas tree ...
The war supplemental appropriations bill is one of the few must-pass legislative vehicle to leave the station this year. That has lawmakers in both parties eying it as an engine to tug funding for their pet programs into law. Republicans were disappointed that Bush accepted about $17 billion in add-ons to last year's war funding bill and the White House is determined to avoid a repeat.

Meanwhile, Democrats are poised to clip almost $10 billion worth of savings from Bush's war funding request and shift the money to other purposes, including long-term purchases of next generation F-22 fighter planes, 15 C-17 cargo planes and 10 C-130 cargo planes. Another $3.5 billion would be diverted to pay for higher fuel costs. The savings to pay for the military add-ons would come from a lower estimate for operations costs, reducing purchases of light trucks for the Army, and purchases of fewer combat radios, according to documents the Pentagon gave to lawmakers.
Once again taking money from our troops for their pork. Lawmakers are at least predictable.
Posted by:

#6  They can't leave it alone, Woodrow Slusorong7967. Their base is the Progressives, not the centrist [Reagan] Democrats. Which is one reason why the swing to the center by the Democratic presidential candidate will be so amusing this fall -- s/he has so very far to travel, and so many speeches to unsay.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-04-19 14:40  

#5  Rhetorical question, they'll never learn.

It's even more Rhetorical than that, it's really "When will WE (Voters) Learn, and NOT re-elect these slimeballs.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-04-19 14:09  

#4  Nancy Pelosi and Murtha are the gift that just keeps on giving to the Republican party. The obvious flaw in their strategy is that it is clearly in the interest of the Republicans if the Dems can not pass a war funding bill. As much as the Democrats might like to believe the press and their moon-bat base, the fact is that the majority of Americans do support the war. That's why when Dems try to pass bills to bring the troops home or to limit funding they get their bums handed to them in a bag - EVERY TIME.

So you would think they would just wrap up a nice package that they KNOW the president will sign and get quietly get the issue off the table befor the fall. Just putting extra GI benefits in there isn't going to fool ANYONE since most American's believe that GW Bush supports the troops.

It is only in the advantage of the Republicans if their bill does not pass or is vetoed by the president. You can only wonder if they are really as stooopid as they seem to be.
Posted by: Woodrow Slusorong7967   2008-04-19 10:18  

#3  Hopefully they get a big'ol knobby stick up the bum this year from the elections... but I doubt it.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-19 09:56  

#2  Rhetorical question, they'll never learn.
Posted by: Theanter Grundy1451   2008-04-19 08:54  

#1  Same shit different year. When will they ever learn.
Posted by: Theanter Grundy1451   2008-04-19 08:54  

00:00