You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iran Ordered Muqtada al-Sadr to Return to Al-Najaf - Iraqi Sources
2008-04-14
London, Asharq Al-Awsat- The situation in the city of Al-Najaf has intensified following Friday's assassination of the brother-in-law of Muqtada al-Sadr by unidentified gunmen and while the authorities imposed a curfew in the city for fear of acts of violence, Al-Sadr called on the government "to carry out a fair investigation" of the assassination of Riyad al-Nuri, the director of his office, after the Friday prayers. On its part, the Iraqi Government condemned the assassination and Al-Sadr Trend Spokesman Salah al-Ubaydi said "Muqtada al-Sadr asked the government to carry out a fair investigation and reveal the parties behind the incident."

Unidentified gunmen assassinated Riyad al-Nuri, the director of Al-Sadr's office and his brother-in-law, near his house in Al-Najaf, only two days after Al-Sadr's arrival in the city after having left the Iranian city of Qom "secretly" on the orders of the Iranian authorities, according to statements made by authoritative Iraqi sources in Qom and Al-Najaf to Asharq Al-Awsat. These sources said Al-Nuri led exactly five years ago an armed attack on the moderate Shiite cleric Abdul-Majid al-Khoei, the secretary general of the Imam al-Khoei Foundation, inside Al-Haydariyah shrine. al-Khoei and Haydar al-Rufayi, the official in charge of the administration of the Imam Ali shrine, were killed in the attack which took place only one day after the collapse of former regime.

The Iraqi sources in Qom and Al-Najaf asserted that the Iranian authorities informed Al-Sadr of the need to leave their territories because of the security problems he had caused in Iraq following the armed clashes between the pro-Al-Sadr "Al-Mahdi Army" militia and Iraqi forces in Basra, Baghdad, Al-Diwaniyah, Karbala, and Al-Kut. They added that moderate officials in Iran denounced Al-Sadr's presence in their territories saying that this was causing problems with the Iraqi Government and that "affects the course of relations between Tehran and Baghdad."

Iraqi sources in Al-Najaf said Al-Sadr "arrived from Qom the night before yesterday and stayed at the house of one of his aides, where his supporters were banned from reaching him, after being forced to stay for six months in an isolated house on the outskirts of the Iranian city of Qom."

An Iranian official last week denied that Al-Sadr was in Iranbut Ali al-Adib, a leading member of Al-Da'wah Party told Asharq Al-Awsat that he met him in Qom less than a week ago.

In other news, Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh vowed on Sunday that Iraqi forces will battle militiamen in Sadr City relentlessly until the sprawling Shiite district of east Baghdad has been cleared of gunmen.

"We will continue until we secure Sadr City. We will not come out, we will not give up until the people of Sadr City have a normal life," Dabbagh told AFP. "(The security forces) will do what they have to do to secure the area. I can't tell you how many days or how many months but they will not come out until they have secured Sadr City."

Raging battles between US and Iraqi forces and Mahdi Army militiamen loyal to radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr have killed around 80 people in the impoverished township since Sunday last week, and the army has warned the streets are littered with booby-traps laid by gunmen.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#20  "Yo! Fatso! Giddadahere!"
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-04-14 17:43  

#19  In Lebanon, its not clear who the alt shia power base is to Hezbollah - Amal, for example has been closer to hezb than Dawa was to the Mahdi Army.

Might I suggest the Lebanese Army? Though the shia who compose it are more nationalistic than, say, Amal.

The problem, of course, is that Lebanese government seems more concerned with the nation to the south of them, rather than the nation(s) within.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-04-14 16:38  

#18  Abu Uluque, he already does. This morning he turned sidewise in a front of a mirror and saw a fork in his back.
Posted by: twobyfour   2008-04-14 16:19  

#17  Sounds like Mookie better watch his back.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2008-04-14 15:02  

#16  #7, nah Lebanon/Pal aint Iraq. The issue in Iraq is that the Shia are divided, and theres a Shia force that Iran can try to influence but that doesnt like Sadr. That force - the Shia elements in the Iraqi govt, SCIRI and Dawa - by taking on Sadr and beating him (apparently, so far) have reduced Irans leverage, its ability to play both sides. To put it differently, Irans need and desire to maintain influence in Iran now gives the Iraqi govt leverage over Iran.

In Lebanon, its not clear who the alt shia power base is to Hezbollah - Amal, for example has been closer to hezb than Dawa was to the Mahdi Army.

Similarly theres no options for them in Pal to Hamas/IJ. Who do they go with, Abbas/Fayed? I dont think so. And certainly not Israel. Though some doves and "realists" will claim that Iran will turn completely if only we would talk sweetly to them, I think THATS unrealistic. And to those who suggest what happened in Basra wasnt talk, I agree, but for a bunch of reasons what the Iraqi forces did in Basra cant be replicated in Gaza, not anytime soon.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-04-14 13:45  

#15  Puppets look weird when you start cutting the strings.
Posted by: KBK   2008-04-14 13:44  

#14  tu3031: shhh. Jack Shafer will eat your liver if you suggest that meth addicts might have poor dental hygiene.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-04-14 13:34  

#13  The must have received the cost estimate on his dental work...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2008-04-14 13:23  

#12  Looks like meth mouth to me.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-04-14 13:15  

#11  "I saw a comment that Sadr is a serious drug addict. Can't remember who."

Heroin or some other opiate might explain the teeth.
Posted by: Pete Stanley   2008-04-14 13:05  

#10  "We will continue until we secure Sadr City. We will not come out, we will not give up until the people of Sadr City have a normal life," Dabbagh told AFP.

Normal life - keep beating it in

this is a wonderful phrase and should be used by the gov't whenever possible.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2008-04-14 12:47  

#9  "You send me back and I will poke myself right in the eye, that will show you!!
Posted by: steven   2008-04-14 12:46  

#8   I saw a comment that Sadr is a serious drug addict. Can't remember who.
Posted by: Grunter   2008-04-14 12:30  

#7  Who's next? Assad? Nasrallah? Meshal? If the mad mullahs can smell a loser (and I'm sure mookie smells extra bad), there may be some fresh spring breezes on the horizon...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2008-04-14 12:19  

#6  Does this mean the US will start protecting Tater from assassination by his former friends? How revolting.
Posted by: Iblis   2008-04-14 12:11  

#5  Seems to me that Mookie overstayed his welcome, and was sent home. I think even Iran understands that they will have to deal with a strong Iraq as next-door-neighbor, and are cutting their losses. Don't expect Mookie to survive very long - if the Iraqis loyal to al-Sistani don't off him, the Iranians probably will.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2008-04-14 11:55  

#4  if its true that the Mullahs are throwing Sadr under the bus, maybe they can do the same with their allies in the NYTimes
Posted by: mhw   2008-04-14 11:54  

#3  sounds like Tater has become personna non-grata in ran. He couldn't deliver on his promises to his masters in Teheran.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2008-04-14 11:38  

#2  I think Iran is cutting its losses. The Basra operation for them was a complete disaster and a good chunk of their fighting capability with the militia is gone or refusing to fight.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-14 11:36  

#1  Tater had some popular support because the people viewed he and his movement as the "strong horse" in Iraq. They had no confidence in the Iraqi government or the ISF. But in the last few weeks, a funny thing has happened. The Maliki government and the ISF, while not without the obligatory screw-ups, has challenged Tater and showed that it just might be the stronger horse. At the least, they have demonstrated that they won't be intimiated nor wil they back down from a fight. Having the US military on your side certainly makes it a lot easier. Be that as it may, if they stick with it, there's a good chance the people will recognize the real strong horse, the US backed Iraqi government and ISF, and begin to turn away from Sadr. When that happens and Tater's popular support, or lack thereof, reaches a certain tipping point, he and his minions' days will be numbered.
Posted by: eltoroverde   2008-04-14 11:31  

00:00