You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Stop threats and we'll talk, Iran tells West
2008-03-10
Iran told the West on Sunday that it would only hold talks over its disputed nuclear programme if world powers stopped threatening further punitive measures against Tehran.

“The time of using the policy of the carrot and the stick has ended,” said Javad Vaeedi, a top national security official, said on the sidelines of a security conference in Tehran.

“If they [the West] want to have serious negotiations, in fair conditions and taking into account the interests of the two parties, they must first stop threatening [Iran].” His comments came a week after the UN Security Council tightened sanctions against Tehran over its refusal to heed the world body’s calls to freeze uranium enrichment.

No talks with Solana: Following the UN security council resolution, which tightened sanctions by the UN Security council against Tehran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad rejected any new talks with the European UnionÂ’s foreign policy chief, Javier Solana.

Ahmadinejad said Tehran would in future negotiate only with the UN atomic agency and would not sit down with anyone from outside the body, such as Solana. Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, speaking at a conference in Tehran, meanwhile refused to directly answer a question about whether Iran would continue talking to Solana.
Posted by:Fred

#4  STRATEGYPAGE > COUNTER-TERRORISM: WAITING FOR THE AMERICANS TO LEAVE. - Article on MUGTADA AL-SADR, ANTI-US "TIME" FACTORS/VARIABLES, and how the likely future face of Islamist terrorism in Iraq will be SHIA RADICALIST. SADR's + ISLAMIST PROB IN IRAQ-ME > ARTICLE MAKES IT CLEAR THAT AMER INTENDS TO STAY IN IRAQ = ME FOR A "LONG, LONG TIME" - ALTHOUGH ITS NOT CLEAR HOW POTENT ANY SAID REMAINING US-ALLIED MILFORS WILL BE, ARTICLE HINTS THAT AMER IS NOT GOING TO LEAVE PRO-DEMOCRATIC IGA VULNERABLE, NOR MIL UNSUPPORTED VV WEAK MIL UNITS.

StratPage Article > describes SADR as "may be slow, but not stupid". METHINKS ITS MORE CORRECT TO SAY SADR IS "FOCUSED", NOT SLOW. Lest we fergit, ANTI-US/WESTERN "TIME" etc. gener works IN FAVOR OF RADICAL ISLAMISM EVENTUALLY GETTING THEIR "ISLAMIST/IRANIAN BOMB", espec in the absence of BILATERAL PEACE, IMPLOSION, OR "DEMOCRATIC REGIME CHANGE".

*As a reminder, TOPIX > UN BANS/SANCTIONS WILL NOT STOP PROLIFERATION.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-03-10 19:38  

#3  As learned from the NKor "Appeasement for Dummies" Self help book.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-03-10 14:14  

#2  Just once, I'd like to see a diplomat instruct an opponent, baldly, "talk or die!" It'd go a long way towards seducing me away from the supposition that the Retief novels were disguised non-fiction.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-03-10 12:33  

#1  Crash and burn sand fleas, you'll run out of money eventually, before you have a nuke I hope.

I say hope because it is clearly evident to me that nobody is going to DO anything to stop you, just a lot of big talk.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-03-10 12:08  

00:00