You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Experts fear debris isn't the only fallout from satellite shoot-down
2008-02-22
Can we have some smelling salts please? McClatchy Media just fainted dead away.
A U.S. missile strike that appeared Thursday to have shattered a crippled spy satellite and vaporized its hazardous hydrazine fuel sent up cheers among Pentagon planners, who for three weeks had worked feverishly to turn an anti-missile system into one that could track and kill an object orbiting the Earth.

BUT even as debris from the shattered satellite began raining down over the Pacific Ocean, there were worries that the U.S. achievement might spur other nations to advance their own anti-satellite programs and turn outer space into a potential battlefield. "I don't see how other nations don't see this as an anti-satellite test," said Theresa Hitchens, the director of the Washington D.C.-based Center for Defense Information, a centrist national security policy institute. "They'll see it as the weaponization of space."

Hitchens said she believed that both China and Russia would use the U.S. destruction of the satellite as reason to step up development of their own anti-satellite weapons. China , she said, is "likely to use this as an excuse to do what they wanted to do already." Russia , she added, "will come down hard on this."

Marine Gen. James Cartwright said there's little the military can learn from the shoot-down that could be applied to missile defense. "It doesn't cross over," he said.

Loren Thompson , a defense analyst at the Washington D.C. area-based Lexington Institute , agreed, noting that most satellites' orbits are too high to be hit by ship-based missiles.
Posted by:Seafarious

#19  Again, TU24/WD5. HOLMES, etc > TU24 was supposed to pass Earth [WD5 > MARS] as ORGANZ SINGLE INTACT LONER OBJECTS. There were NOT suppos to be accompanying fireballs, star streaks, or assorted space detonations = boom-booms BEFORE ANDOR DURING PASSAGE. NASA-JPL, etc > haven't even begun to publicly address or even acknowledge the accompanying phenomenas observed by many Netters including MOI. SPACE.com/VARI ASTRONOM BLOGS > ALL THEY WANT TO SAY OR PROCLAIM THAT THEY BELIEVE THE SINGULAR/SOLE OBJECTS KNOWN AS TU24 + WD5 PASSED EARTH AND MARS, AND NOT ANYTHING MORE THAN THAT. THATS POLITIX, NOT NATIONAL-GLOBAL SECURITY.

E.g. LAST NITE > despite inclement local weather, SOMETHING BIG AND WID A LONG, MASSIVELY WIDE TAIL BLITZED OVER GUAM IN NORTHERLY DIRECTION AND SEEMINGLY VERY CLOSE TO EARTH. It was fiery enuff, big enuff, and close enuff to be seen thru the bad weather + heavy low overcast o'er AGANA, GUAM. *OBJECT'S SIZE + SPEED > I doubt all the AEGIS + strategic ICBM MISSLES in the US-World could've stopped it EVEN IFF THESE COLLECTIVELY + SUCCESSFULLY IMPACTED WID PINPOINT ACCURACY. MY POINT > THIS GUAM AM + MIDMORN = SILENCE ON THE MSM + from our GOVT.

The shootdown of USA 193 was a good start but USA 193 is NOT a space rock - IFF THE WORLD =HUMANITY TRULY DESIRES OWG-NWO, SAID DESIRED OWG-NWO MUST BE ABLE TO PROTECT FROM EXTRA-GLOBAL THREATS AND CHALLENGES, NOT KEEP S *** TO ITSELF BECUZ THEY THINK NO ONE IS GONNA FIND OUT.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-02-22 19:46  

#18  We need to keep working on this technology - it's going to be needed one of these days to zap an incomng asteroid that could wipe out life as we know it.
Posted by: Glenmore   2008-02-22 15:19  

#17  Folks, ignore all this crap, they've GOT to show SOMETHING wrong to sell hystria driven "News".
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-02-22 15:10  

#16  for three weeks had worked feverishly to turn an anti-missile system into one that could track and kill an object orbiting the Earth.

Bullshit alarm clanging away madly.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-02-22 15:06  

#15  How does a ground-launched weapon become "weaponization of space"?

Hell, even my spell-checker objects to that construction.
Posted by: mojo   2008-02-22 14:12  

#14  The only fallout they are concerned about is how wrong they look after so many years of no-can-do and whether people will apply that thought process into their goerbal swarming montra.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2008-02-22 11:43  

#13  Does it matter what rational the Chicoms and Russians use? We know they'd like to build the stuff anyway and they'll invent rationals if they need to.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-02-22 11:22  

#12  the director of the Washington D.C.-based Center for Defense Information, a centrist national security policy institute.

(Snort)

I remember this organization produced a show on PBS(naturally) in the 80's whose main thrust was that spending money on anything more advanced than a slingshot was a waste and unnecessary provocation to the Soviets.
Posted by: charger   2008-02-22 10:20  

#11  Some wit was reporting yesterday that a large, cylindrical piece of debris believed to be from the satellite had actually crashed in an unincorporated area within West Windsor Township, New Jersey.

Soon after, local residents had seen large numbers of short, googly-eyed, furry blue creatures wandering around aimlessly in Grover's Mill...
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-02-22 09:12  

#10  Ummmmmm...so what? I hope we do it again tomorrow.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-02-22 08:30  

#9  big jim don't you mean China is working on a way to STEAL the technology too do this more effectively
Posted by: sinse   2008-02-22 08:28  

#8  
Um... unless you have been under a rock for the past decade or are just willfully ignorant, China already has one and Russia is trying to build one.


Much as the laws of war only apply to Americans and Israelis, only America can start an arms race.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2008-02-22 08:01  

#7  I don't think they were just going to sit around with their thumbs up their asses. They are most certainly working on the tech to do this themselves.
To let them pull ahead of us would be very, very bad.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-02-22 07:37  

#6  ...there were worries that the U.S. achievement might spur other nations to advance their own anti-satellite programs...

Um... unless you have been under a rock for the past decade or are just willfully ignorant, China already has one and Russia is trying to build one.

"They'll see it as the weaponization of space."

If they are smart. "Hold the high ground" is a true a military statement now as it was during them time of ancient Greece. I fully expect our enemies to take advantage of it and I hope that our nation isn't stupid enough to let it happen.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-02-22 07:16  

#5  The article could have a point, after all, China did spur the US to advance its own anti-satellite program, and has inserted multiple kinetic weapons in orbit.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-02-22 06:05  

#4  Perhaps McClatchy and the MSM had their hearts set on hydrazine headlines.
Posted by: Bobby   2008-02-22 05:47  

#3  "I don't see how other nations don't see this as an anti-satellite test,"

Well, China already did one.
Posted by: newc   2008-02-22 01:32  

#2  I thought the Soviet Union would have learned their lesson in the 1980's not to try to outspend the US on military items. Oh, that's right. There is no Soviet Union any more. Well, apparently Russia didn't learn either.
Posted by: Rambler in California   2008-02-22 01:21  

#1  Washington D.C.-based Center for Defense Information, a centrist national security policy institute.

Google it... yeah, it's 'centrist'...
Posted by: Pappy   2008-02-22 00:54  

00:00