| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Jimmy Carter's theology: the Church of Government |
| 2008-02-04 |
| Shawn Macomber, American Spectator Linkage added. THERE IS A STORY JIMMY Carter tells in several of his books about a newly elected president of the Southern Baptist Convention paying him a visit in the Oval Office and telling the shocked -- shocked! -- Commander in Chief, "We are praying, Mr. President, that you will abandon secular humanism as your religion." "He may have said this because I was against a constitutional amendment to authorize mandatory prayer in public school and had been working on some things opposed by the 'religious right,' such as the Panama Canal treaties, a Department of Education, and the SALT II treaty with the Soviets," Carter theorizes in Living Faith, as if in the 1970s the "religious right" were single-issue voters fixated in the Panama Canal and maybe -- maybe -- disrupting arms treaties rather than, oh, I don't know...abortion. Nevertheless, it isn't quite clear why, outside of the obvious political advantages gained by marrying delusions of grandeur to a sanctimonious religion-based piety, Carter would so object to the "secular humanist" label. . . . Carter places the miracles of government bureaucracy ahead of those of his own church, yet still wonders why the largest single contingent of Baptists in the country is skeptical of his New Covenant. "I treat theological arguments gingerly but am bolder when it comes to connecting my religious beliefs with life and current events in the world, even when the issues are controversial," Carter writes in Living Faith. In other words, the details of scripture are uninteresting until they offer a rationale for Carter's left-wing predilections or somehow justify the four years of tribulation known as his presidency. APPROPRIATELY ENOUGH, to Carter's mind, the biggest trade-off of the Crucifixion may have been gaining eternal salvation while losing a potentially great bureaucratic overlord. During a meditation on the temptation of Christ, Carter muses over the attractiveness of Satan's offer to allow Christ to rule the world if he rejected God: What a wonderful and benevolent government Jesus could have set up. How exemplary justice would have been. Maybe there would have been Habitat projects all over Israel for anyone who needed a home. And the proud, the rich, and the powerful could not have dominated their fellow citizens. As a twentieth-century governor and president I would have had a perfect pattern to follow. I could have pointed to the Bible and told other government leaders, "This is what Jesus did 2000 years ago in government. Why don't we do the same?" That Carter assumes, first, he would be a worthy successor to Christ in political office -- what, Jesus returns to implement...term limits? -- and, second, that the Messiah would spend his post-presidency years doing precisely as Carter did -- building Habitat for Humanity homes, apparently -- tells you everything you need to know about the Man from Plains' outlook on this world and the next. This also shows alleged Sunday School teacher Jimmy's astonishing ignorance of Christian theology. There's a reason why Jesus turned down the offer of earthly power: "My kingdom is not of this world" John 18:36. The quest to build the Kingdom on Earth, instead of storing up your treasures not in this world but the next, is a fool's errand. The history of the past couple centuries is littered with the carnage that results when mortals try to use the secular God-state to perfect human nature. In fact, there's a new book on the subject, just hit the streets; it's quite good. |
| Posted by:Mike |
| #4 Good of you to post that correction and clarification, Deacon. Now, if Jimmy would just acknowledge that the principle applies to Hugo Chavez and Yassir Arafat and Kim Jong Il and Mahmoud Amahdnejad and . . . . |
| Posted by: Mike 2008-02-04 18:00 |
| #3 I think, as does The Captain's Quarters, that Jimmy Carter was the worst President ever. In this instance, like Ed Morrisy, I think he is being unfairly attacked. There was a bit left out from Carter's quote. Here it is, " But the devil stipulated fatal provisos: an abandonment of God, and an acknowledgment of earthly things as dominant. ... Anyone who accepts kingship based on serving the devil rather than God will end up a tyrant, not a benevolent leader." |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2008-02-04 16:42 |
| #2 This also goes in Home Front: Politix as an Opinion piece. AoS. |
| Posted by: Steve White 2008-02-04 12:24 |
| #1 Mods: the last bit(starting at "This also shows . . .") is my commentary; fogot to hilite it. Sorry to make extra work for you. |
| Posted by: Mike 2008-02-04 12:03 |