You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
MN Gov: Pawlenty proposes lifting moratorium on new nuke plants
2008-02-03
St. Paul, Minn. — Gov. Pawlenty is calling for repeal of Minnesota's moratorium on new nuclear power plants. It's part of his preliminary action plan on climate change. He also wants to reduce red tape for renewable energy projects. His proposals are included in a report sent to the legislature Friday.

The report is required by the law that set up the Minnesota Climate Change Advisory Group. That stakeholder group has been meeting for nearly a year.

Some of Pawlenty's proposals follow the advisory group's recommendations; others deviate.

Edward Garvey, Director of the new Office of Energy Security and MPCA assistant commissioner David Thornton participated in the advisory group's deliberations, and they presented the governor's plan. They stressed that it's only a partial plan, saying they want to study some of the issues further.
Posted by:Icerigger

#4  good comment, NMBS. Captures it. Only thing you left out is the NIMBY plus
Posted by: Frank G   2008-02-03 15:55  

#3  # you have captured it exactly. What is most astonishing to me when I talk to the liberal policy makers in state government here, is the total lack of consistency in their environmental policies. When stripped away, the "green" never actually runs counter to their class-warfare, union-appeasement, swamp the state with illegals-who-vote-democratic, paternalistic attitudes.
Ask a California democrat about the impact on the environment by population growth and they scream about protecting the ecosystem. When faced with the fact that all the growth in California population is based on legal and illegal immigration and you recommend a moratorium on the former and enforcement of the border for the latter... they always counter that you are a racist and want to keep the masses pouring in.
When asked about the damge of carbon emmissions, they spout green gibberish about alternative energy, but nuclear......they grow apoplectic...
waste storage... but oppose the planned Nevada site because there might be a spill in transit...
Behind it all is the paternal political agenda, not the real concern for the environment.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2008-02-03 15:10  

#2  They'll just follow the Mexicalifornia approach of keeping the nasty dirty power generation out of their neighborhood. Just import it from other states and bitch about the price.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-02-03 13:05  

#1  Farleftwingesota will never go for it...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2008-02-03 12:21  

00:00