| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| Bush predicts completion of Mideast treaty |
| 2008-01-10 |
| Uh huh. President Bush on Thursday predicted that a Mideast peace treaty would be completed by the time he leaves office, but undercut that optimism with harsh criticism of Hamas militants who control part of the land that would form an eventual independent Palestine. Bush said he's convinced that both Israeli and Palestinian leaders understand "the importance of democratic states living side by side" in peace, and noted that he has a one-year deadline for progress on his watch. "I'm on a timetable," he told reporters. "I've got 12 months." He said he is not sure that the problem of Hamas, a militant Islamic group that took over the Gaza Strip in June, can be solved within that time frame. Hamas, he said, was elected to help improve the lot of Palestinians, but "has delivered nothing but misery." Standing alongside Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Bush said he is confident that "with proper help, the state of Palestine will emerge." "I am confident that the status quo is unacceptable, Mr. President, and we want to help you," Bush said. Abbas called on Israel to fulfill its commitments under a U.S.-backed Mideast peace plan known as the "roadmap," and said he hopes "this will be the year for the creation of peace." Bush is on a three-day visit to Israel and the West Bank to show support for renewed Israeli-Palestinian peace talks following seven years of violence. "The question is whether or not hard issues can be resolved and the vision emerges, so that the choice is clear amongst the Palestinians," Bush said. "The choice being, `Do you want this state? Or do you want the status quo? Do you want a future based upon a democratic state? Or do you want the same old stuff?"' Even though it's Bush's first trip to the Palestinian West Bank, it generated little excitement among Palestinians, who are largely skeptical of his promises to try to move along Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. The U.S. is perceived in the Palestinian areas as a staunch ally of Israel, at the expense of the Palestinians, but Abbas said Bush's visit "that gives our people great hope," Abbas said. Bush said he expects both Israelis and Palestinians to "honor their obligations under the roadmap" peace plan, and that Israelis should help the Palestinians modernize their security forces. "In order for there to be lasting peace, President Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert have to come together and make tough choices," Bush said. "And I'm convinced they will. And I believe it's possible — not only possible, I believe it's going to happen — that there be a signed peace treaty by the time I leave office (in January 2009). That's what I believe." The president described the current round of negotiations as an opportunity to move toward a day when there will be two democracies — Israel and a Palestinian state — living alongside one another in peace. "It is in the interest not only of the Palestinian and Israelis but of the world," Bush said. Bush's travels through the Mideast does not include a stop in Gaza, an area controlled by Hamas, which swept Palestinian parliamentary elections in 2006. Hamas later led a violent takeover of the Gaza Strip, essentially splitting Palestinian governance. Hamas, which does not recognize Israel's right to exist, now runs Gaza, while Abbas and his secular Fatah Party, backed by the United States, now run the West Bank. Fawzi Barhoum, a Hamas spokesman in Gaza, quickly dismissed Bush and Abbas' hopeful comments. "This meeting was for public relations only, it was an empty meeting without results, only more dreams and waste of time," the Hamas spokesman said. "The meeting focused on the so-called security topics which mean to act against the interests of the Palestinian majority and the resistance." While Bush claims that Hamas has failed to help improve the lives of Palestinians living in Gaza, the president acknowledged that he doesn't know whether Abbas' government can resolve the Palestinian division before the end of the year. "Gaza's a tough situation," Bush said. "I don't know whether you can solve it in a year or not." But it won't be solved, Bush said, unless Abbas lays out a choice to the people in Gaza: He defined that as: "Do you want those who have created chaos to run your country? Or do you want those of us who negotiated a settlement with the Israelis that will lead to lasting peace." "There is a competing vision taking place in Gaza," Bush said. "And in my judgment, Hamas — which I thought ran on the campaign, 'We're going to improve your lives through better education and better health' — has delivered nothing but misery." The president also said that he understands Palestinian frustrations over checkpoints throughout the West Bank but says they're necessary for now to give Israelis a sense of security. "Checkpoints create frustrations for people. They create a sense of security for Israelis. They create massive frustration for the Palestinians," Bush said. "The whole object is to create a state that is capable of defending itself internally and giving confidence to its neighbor that checkpoints won't be needed." On Wednesday, Olmert said "there will be no peace" unless attacks are halted from all parts of the Palestinian territories. Olmert, however, said that both sides "are very seriously trying to move forward" on a peace agreement. "Israel does not tolerate and will not tolerate the continuation of these vicious attacks," Olmert said after 2 1/2 hours of talks with Bush. "We will not hesitate to take all the necessary measures. There will be no peace unless terror is stopped. And terror will have to be stopped everywhere." |
| Posted by:gorb |
| #14 See also WAFF.com > MEMRI - THE COLLAPSE OF THE SAUDI SUNNI BLOC AGZ IRAN'S ASPIRATIONS FOR [Iran-centric/dominated]REGIONAL HEGEMONY IN THE PERSIAN GULF. Saudi bloc agz Iran believed to had collapsed due to (1)QATAR's invitation to MOUD = IRAN to attend the DOHA mutli-nation confab/summit, (2) the release of the pro-Iran new US NIE indic that Iran had halted its nucdev prog back in 2003; and (3) the local Arab-GCC preception that said same NIE signaled a de facto shift in US attitudes in favor of new rapproachement or engagement wid Iran. IOW, the GCC includ Saudi Arabia have no justification for continued resistance to IRAN, and may in fact be humiliated into both colluding wid Iran in Iran's ambitions to dominate the GULF and ME + BEGIN WORKING AGZ REGIONAL US-WESTERN INFLUENCE!? *D *** NGED GULF VOLCANOES [shaking fist angrily]. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-01-10 20:09 |
| #13 |
| Posted by: DMFD 2008-01-10 20:04 |
| #12 You do know that Israel offered---several times, to take a cut in assistance provided the same cut is applied to Egypt? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2008-01-10 14:33 |
| #11 "...but why argue over minor details" Sorry...typo. |
| Posted by: DepotGuy 2008-01-10 14:27 |
| #10 OhÂ…and, by the way, weÂ’re pulling your $30 billion a year allowance. Actually it's 3 billion, DP, but why argue over minor details. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2008-01-10 14:22 |
| #9 We already know that his legacy is going to be---the POTUS who allowed Iran to become nuclear. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2008-01-10 14:17 |
| #8 Part of the incentive program. You can have a peace treaty on Bush's term or wait 7 years for the next guy to get around to it. |
| Posted by: Skunky Glins5285 2008-01-10 14:03 |
| #7 Personally, I‘d preferred that the US would have taken the more direct approach. First, publicly tell the Paleos that we want nothing to do with their self-loathing death culture. And that we’re no longer funding their terrorist networks under the guise of humanitarian aid. Have them get back to us, in a generation or two, if and when they have some redeeming qualities. And if, in the meantime, they choose to lie down with their radical Islamo-dog buddies…fine. But if they get fleas in the process, go crying to the Arab League or the Euro-weenies. Hah… or better yet… the UN. Next, publicly announce to Israel that it has been years since we’ve actually been strategic allies. In fact, inform them in no uncertain terms that we believe them to be a continual strategic liability. Let them know that we trust they will make prudent decisions and we’re confident they can take care of themselves. Oh…and, by the way, we’re pulling your $30 billion a year allowance. Sorry but we got this trillion dollar deficit shit going on. Anyhoo, if you guys want a state…two states…no states…whatever…it’s up to you. Meantime, if ya hadn’t noticed, we got our own shit to take care of. |
| Posted by: DepotGuy 2008-01-10 12:51 |
| #6 It's that "legacy" sh*t Kelly. They want their shot at glory. Must be something in the water in DC. |
| Posted by: Spot 2008-01-10 11:46 |
| #5 I'll translate: Hold onto your wallets. |
| Posted by: tu3031 2008-01-10 11:11 |
| #4 Why do US Presidents go crazy in their last year in office and figure they can make/force/cause peace between Isreal and Palestine? Is it one last go at the slot machine of fame? Someone should check the water in the White House |
| Posted by: Kelly 2008-01-10 11:03 |
| #3 About as useful as that Koran Toiletpaper that German fellow is being tried over. Perhaps the treaty should be sold as a souvenir in that fashion, at least that way both parties will get some use out of it. I mean really, what good is a treaty we all know only one side will follow? |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2008-01-10 10:50 |
| #2 The president also said that he understands Palestinian frustrations over checkpoints throughout the West Bank but says they're necessary for now to give Israelis a sense of security. Mindless, nuttering Condispeak. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2008-01-10 10:39 |
| #1 I'm amazed: I am actually in agreement with the liberals that Bush is incredibly stupid. The moment you reveal you have a deadline, you've given up control of the negotiations. Gift-wrap yer balls and hand them over, idiot. |
| Posted by: Ptah 2008-01-10 10:32 |