| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: Politix | |
| Diebold Derangement Syndrome | |
| 2008-01-09 | |
| |
| Posted by:Seafarious |
| #8 About half the Kossacks are screaming that Hillary and Diebold stole the election. The other half are calling the first group nasty names because they're falling for silly conspiracy theories. |
| Posted by: Mike 2008-01-09 19:33 |
| #7 Speaking of patterns of paranoid thinking, prison planet is claiming the vote was rigged to keep ron paul down (who else?), and boost clinton and guilliani up. |
| Posted by: anonymous5089 2008-01-09 14:46 |
| #6 It just demonstrates a PATTERN of paranoid thinking that is totally detached from reality. But who here didn't at least suspect that? |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2008-01-09 09:57 |
| #5 Good points uro. However even with voting machines the donks can defraud their way into office. Case in point the last Washington state election. modern voting machines, two recounts, 'found' ballots, felons, the dead, and imaginary friends (of the democrats) voting. The King County (Wa's largest) elections office is the county executive's (a democrat) private fifedome. And now the latest - mandatory vote-by-mail. No need for positive ID (and definately no need of proof of citizenship!). Just send in (or have your local DNC operative send in - with or without your knowledge) you ballot by mail. Trust us - we're the Democrats! Personally I think if your not disabled or out of the country you can get your lazy fat ass down to the polling place and vote in person. Same with registration. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2008-01-09 08:46 |
| #4 Can there be any coincidence that this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine&oref=slogin appeared the weekend prior to the New hampshire primary? |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2008-01-09 07:15 |
| #3 Excellent post, no more uro. The notorious mafia-influenced New Jersey voting patterns and New York's sordid electoral history dating back to Tammany Hall only reinforce your point. |
| Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723 2008-01-09 06:02 |
| #2 Voting machines combined with photo ID - which eliminate voting by the dead and proxy - would be the death of the Dems and they know it. After 2000, there were cries of outrage from the Dems about how we needed election reform and modernization. I knew then that it was a bunch of hot air, and it's no less so now. The Democrats have no good reason and no incentive at all (actually a disincentive) to want a more modern, accurate tally of votes. The Democrat party is the party of voter fraud, particularly in the Rust Belt area of the U.S. "Fudgeable" paper ballots and tallies of said ballots have been the means of insuring that Dems win in key close districts in cities in the northeast and upper midwest for decades now. A simple online search will net you a wealth of information regarding this subject. This began in the 1930's and got a boost in the 1960 debacle, when votes were manufactured to make JFK president. That is the template, and it will be followed. The real fear of the Dems is not that the Repubs will use the machines to engineer a victory (well, maybe among the moonbat fringe it is - projection and all that), but rather that a more accurate means of counting votes will destroy their hegemonic hold on a lot of urban districts in some of the blue and purple states. |
| Posted by: no mo uro 2008-01-09 05:43 |
| #1 How can Hillary possibly lose with Karl Rove, Diebold and Halliburton on her side? The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is even more devious than we thought! |
| Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723 2008-01-09 04:18 |