You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
UN Extends US-Led Force in Iraq
2007-12-19
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously Tuesday to extend the U.S.-led multinational force in Iraq for one year, a move that Iraq's prime minister said would be his nation's ``final request'' for help. Authorization for the 160,000-strong multinational force was extended until the end of 2008 because ``the threat in Iraq continues to constitute a threat to international peace and security,'' according to the resolution.

Iraq's U.N. Ambassador Hamid Al Bayati called it a historic day for the country because the council renewed the mandate ``for the last time'' after long and hard negotiation. He expressed hope that the council would deal with Iraq without any military authorizations after 2008. ``We realize that Iraq still needs more time and intensive efforts to enable our armed forces to take over the security responsibilities all over Iraq from the multinational forces,'' he said, noting that Iraqi forces took responsibility for Basra two days ago and now control nine provinces.

U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad formally introduced the resolution Tuesday afternoon and soon after the council met to approve it. After the 15-0 vote, Khalilzad cited ``positive developments in Iraq'' including reduced violence. He welcomed the council's support for the Iraqi government's desire ``to sustain this momentum'' and keep the force in the country.

The resolution requires a review of the mandate at the request of the Iraqi government or by June 15, 2008. It reiterates a provision of past resolutions that the council ``will terminate this mandate earlier'' if Iraq requests that. It also says the Security Council would have to consider Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's request, in a letter on Dec. 7 to the Security Council's president, that ``this is to be the final request ... for the extension of the mandate'' for the U.S.-led force.

Asked whether the United States wanted to keep the door open to maintaining its troops in Iraq longer, Khalilzad said the extension is at the request of the Iraqi government ``representing the will of the Iraqi people.'' ``We hope that ... with progress in Iraqi security capabilities that Iraq's goal of self-reliance can be achieved as soon as possible,'' he said.

In Baghdad, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told reporters Tuesday that ``there has been a great deal of progress'' thanks to the joint efforts of Iraqis and the multinational force.'' ``These gains are really very significant. We see them in the streets of Baghdad in many provinces. This needs to be pressed on,'' said Zebari, according to a transcript provided by the U.S. State Department in Washington.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  Well, ya see, we went in there illegally, so that was bad. And the US just tells the UN what to do, and that is bad, too. And so, our staying in there is still illegal. So we should get out, cuz we're losing anyway.
/sarcasm
Posted by: Rambler   2007-12-19 13:24  

#2  But, but, the lefties decry that this is all illegal. How can this be? /sarcasm off
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-12-19 06:52  

#1  The U.N. sanctions our presence in Iraq?

Has anybody told Harry and Nancy?
Posted by: Bobby   2007-12-19 06:01  

00:00