You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Court Rejects ACLU Request on Wiretaps
2007-12-13
The top secret US court overseeing electronic surveillance programs rejected a petition to release documents on the legal status of the government’s “war-on-terror” wiretap operations.

In only the third time the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) has publicly released a ruling, it turned back a request to reveal documents that would shed light on the governmentÂ’s program to spy on the communications of terror suspects without first obtaining warrants.

FISCÂ’s ruling argued that its role as a unique court dealing with national security issues necessarily meant its case documents and decisions would be classified, and that US constitutional provisions did not require it to release case materials.

It also said that even first deleting sensitive material from the papers sought by the American Civil Liberties Union — secret documents related to the legality of the surveillance programs — risked accidentally damaging the country’s security.

“That possibility itself may be a price too high to pay,” the court said in rejecting the ACLU request. Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU National Security Project, called the decision disappointing.

“A federal court’s interpretation of federal law should not be kept secret from the American public,” Jaffer said. “The Bush administration is seeking expanded surveillance powers from Congress because of the rulings issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court earlier this year. Under this decision, those rulings may remain secret forever.”

Posted by:Fred

#3  Under this decision, those rulings may remain secret forever.

Well, if it keeps terrorists dying and not killing Americans, I can live with that. Also, if it keeps information out of your little dick beaters to try to protect said terrorists, then that is a good thing™.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-12-13 11:15  

#2  Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU National Security Project...

Oh, great. I'm sure Jameel has our back...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-12-13 08:57  

#1  Shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks the ACLU was trying to get a handle on what the Bush administration was doing in terms of homeland security and responding to the attack. Jaffer helped with the legal work.

When he began the job in 2002, Ann Beeson, the associate legal director of the ACLU, approached him with the roughly 200-page Patriot Act. "I was sequestered for three weeks with it," he said. "And that was the beginning of our recent national security work."

Jaffer's office is neat, with photographs taken by him in India and the Middle East hanging on the walls, and a squash racquet tossed in the corner.


From a puff piece source
Posted by: Bobby   2007-12-13 06:10  

00:00