You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq PM demands execution of Chemical Ali
2007-12-01
The Iraqi government has asked US President George W. Bush to order the handover of Saddam Hussein’s cousin, known as “Chemical Ali”, and two other former officials convicted of genocide, so that they can be executed. Saddam’s cousin Ali Hassan al-Majid, former Defence Minister Sultan Hashem and former army commander Hussein Rashid Muhammad are being held in US military custody while officials argue over who has the authority to transfer them for execution. They were convicted of genocide for their roles in a campaign against Iraq’s Kurds in 1988, but the US military has said it will not hand them over until it receives what it calls an “authoritative government of Iraq request”.

What constitutes such a request is at the centre of a row between Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s Shiite-led government and President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, and Sunni Arab Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi. Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh told Reuters on Friday Maliki had sent a letter to Bush last week in which he “demanded the three convicts be handed over”.

“The US forces do not have the right to interfere in a judicial case and decide whether it was legal or not,” Dabbagh said. “Only Iraqi authorities have the right to do so.”

The US embassy in Baghdad had no comment on the letter. Maliki has said the US embassy in Baghdad has played an “unfortunate role” in preventing the handover of the three. Talabani and Hashemi say Iraq’s constitution stipulates that the three-man presidency council - made up of the president and two vice presidents - should sign the order.
Posted by:Fred

#3  I don't get this one - the procedures for requesting transfer of custody were clear enough for the transfer of No. 1 last year. And while I thought apparent US foot-dragging for that case was unwise (though understandable, if only to keep Saddam around for the full Anfal trial), I can't see the angle here. Chemical Ali's big case was Anfal - his second big case would be the 1991 intifada case, but if the Shi'a govt. wants him to swing now, that shows they're not determined to have him around for that trial.

We have physical custody of the prisoners, but the Iraqis (the tribunal, until they have finished with appeals of sentences) have judicial control.
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-12-01 18:48  

#2  Oh comeon now, you should know a Hangman's noose has thirteen windings, not ten.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-12-01 14:09  

#1  
Posted by: gorb   2007-12-01 02:57  

00:00