| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| Cyber jihad on November 11? Don't count on it. |
| 2007-11-01 |
| Security experts are saying that a reported al-Qaeda cyber jihad attack planned against Western institutions should be treated with skepticism. The attack was reported by DEBKAfile, an online military intelligence magazine. Citing anonymous "counter-terror sources," DEBKAfile said it had intercepted an Oct. 29 "Internet announcement," calling for a volunteer-run online attack against 15 targeted sites, set to begin Nov. 11. The operation is supposed to expand after its launch date until "hundreds of thousands of Islamist hackers are in action against untold numbers of anti-Muslim sites," the magazine reported. Such an attack could be launched with a known software kit, called Electronic Jihad Version 2.0, said Paul Henry, vice president of technology evangelism with Secure Computing. This software, which has been in circulation for about three years, has recently become more easily configurable so that it could be more effective in a distributed denial of service attack, such as the one suggested by the DEBKAfile report. Attackers would download Jihad 2.0 to their own desktops and specify the amount of bandwidth they would like to consume, not unlike the SETI@home software package used to scan for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence. However, Henry said that his law enforcement contacts are treating the report with some skepticism. "I talked to a few people today who know of DEBKAfile, who feel they are dubious, but they can be credible," he said. "I'm not looking at Nov. 11 as being the day that the Internet goes down." Security expert Gadi Evron, who recently studied the cyber attacks in Estonia, expressed similar skepticism. "DEBKAfile gets a lot of news that no one else has, and fast," he said. "But it's a community driven tabloid. Treat it as a golden source to be taken with 5 grains of salt," he said via instant message. Even if an attack is planned, it would likely be nothing new, Evron added. "Cyber jihad on the level of attacking Web sites happens every day for numerous causes by enthusiasts. The content of this warning is doubtful. There are not hundreds of thousands of infosec workers world-wide, not to mention working for al-Qaeda," he said. He believes that some low-skilled hackers may be planning something, but that DEBKAfile has probably not uncovered plans of a major online attack. This is not the first time that the West has been threatened with cyber jihad. In December 2006, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) warned U.S. banks and financial institutions of a possible al-Qaeda cyber attack. That operation, nicknamed "the Electronic Battle of Guantanamo," turned out to be a dud. |
| Posted by:ryuge |
| #7 #4. If OP is successful , will the Cyber Jihadi martyrs be rewarded with virtual virgins? |
| Posted by: GK 2007-11-01 20:18 |
| #6 sorry, forgot to include the link re: darknets |
| Posted by: lotp 2007-11-01 13:36 |
| #5 OP, most of the important jihadi sites are on a darknet. The visible sites on the Internet are in many cases the only window that the intel community has to latch onto and track activities down there. Shutting them down would be counter productive. |
| Posted by: lotp 2007-11-01 13:34 |
| #4 I hereby volunteer to take the cyber-jihad to the enemy. Someone send me some software and a list of sites, and I'll begin bombarding them from my home computer. I'm sure we can bring ALL the jihadi websites to their knees with just the readers (and lurkers) of Rantburg. Either that, or someone set up some fake eBay sites to do the same thing, selling a dozen nude pics of some of Fred's young ladies. Cyber-war can be a two-edged sword. I'm betting there are more "swords" in in Wyoming than in any single Arab state. |
| Posted by: Old Patriot 2007-11-01 12:25 |
| #3 I'll wear a sweater on the 11th, just in case. And please pass on our thanks to dud defusers, if you'd be so kind, lotp -- it sounds like it's an on-going headache. Actually, I think some Rantburgers may be involved in protecting us against that stuff, so let me directly thank y'all -- you know who you are, even if I don't. :-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-11-01 11:28 |
| #2 Some of those 'duds' were defused rather than imaginary, but in any case ... I would be more worried about a NORK hack attack against SCADA control systems (power grid etc.) on behalf of Iran. |
| Posted by: lotp 2007-11-01 09:08 |
| #1 For some reason, the kooks are really focusing on this year's 11/11 for paranoid rumors. One that's been around for a while is that is when radiation bombs are going to be detonated in a few cities. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2007-11-01 09:00 |