You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
He's Back!
2007-10-29
Chalabi back in action in Iraq

BAGHDAD-Ahmad Chalabi, the controversial, ubiquitous Iraqi politician and one-time Bush administration favorite, has re-emerged as a central figure in the latest U.S. strategy for Iraq.

His latest job: To press Iraq's central government to use early security gains from the surge to deliver better electricity, health, education and local security services to Baghdad neighborhoods. That's the next phase of the surge plan. Until now, the U.S. military, various militias, insurgents and some U.S. backed groups have provided those services without great success.

That the U.S. and Iraqi officials are again turning to Chalabi, this time to restore life to Baghdad neighborhoods, speaks to his resiliency in this nascent government. It's also, some say, his latest effort to promote himself as a true national advocate for everyday Iraqis.

Chalabi, in the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, provided White House and Pentagon officials and journalists with a stream of bogus or exaggerated intelligence about Iraq's weapons programs and ties to terrorism. He also suggested that he'd lead Iraq to make peace with Israel and welcome permanent U.S. military bases, which could apply pressure to Iran and Syria.

But Chalabi's proven a resilient politician since then and Iraqis yearn for someone who can make the government help them. In sermons in the holy Shiite city of Najaf and in Sunni newspapers alike, Iraqis here often reject their central government, saying it has done nothing for them since the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime. Instead, the government's critics say, local tribal leaders and residents rejuvenated neighborhoods by pushing fighters out and securing the streets.

U.S. officials maintain that it's up to the central government to provide Iraqis with longer-term stability. Iraqis agree, especially when it comes to services beyond the capability of neighborhood councils, such as providing electricity, bringing doctors back into neighborhoods, establishing and paying a police force and building a school system, Traditionally, Iraq's central government delivered these services.

"The key is going to be getting the concerned local citizens — and all the citizens — feeling that this government is reconnected with them," Gen. David Petraeus, the top military commander here, said Saturday. Chalabi "agrees with that."

Earlier this month, Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki named Chalabi as head of the services committee, a consortium of eight service ministries and two Baghdad municipal posts, that is tasked with bringing services to Baghdad, the heart of the surge plan.

Chalabi "is an important part of the process," said Col. Steven Boylan, Petraeus' spokesman. "He has a lot of energy."

Unless the government steps in, U.S. military commanders stationed in small outposts throughout Baghdad fear their rebuilding programs and other efforts to weaken one-time al Qaida and militia bastions will collapse as soon as troops leave. If that happens, those groups will dominate the neighborhoods again, they say.

Lt. Col. Ken Adgie, of National Park, N.J., commander of the 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment out of Fort Stewart, Ga., is in charge of securing Arab Jabour, a southern Sunni Baghdad neighborhood long under al Qaida control.

With no U.S. or Iraqi forces in this almost exclusively Sunni neighborhood since the fall of Saddam's regime, al Qaida controlled it, in part, by rationing food and electricity to the residents.

Adgie's troops now are building a health care facility, securing water supplies and working with local concerned residents to secure the area's main street, which is lined with a handful of mud shack stores.

"Right now, it's a Band-Aid. ...But boy it would be nice if we got the government's help," Adgie said. "We refuse to let al Qaida creep back in. ...You can't let up. It's slow constant pressure."

So far, the central government has not been effective. On Saturday, Petraeus traveled to Arab Jabour with Chalabi, their first trip together to a Baghdad neighborhood since Chalabi's new posting. During the trip, Col. Terry Ferrell, 2nd brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division described where he wants to see a new health care facility. Chalabi chimed in: "Where is the Health Ministry in this?"

"That's your job," Petraeus replied.

And as Chalabi tried to assure the residents of Arab Jabour that the government would help, they told him they had heard it before. So far, the vice president, the governor of Baghdad and a top Iraqi police commander have traveled to Arab Jabour promising to deliver 200 police officers. None have shown up.

"We made life better here, not the government," said Abdul Raziq al Jabouri, a newly-named security officer in Arab Jabour. "If we had waited for the government we would have been gone by now. We are not waiting. We don't expect anything."

So Chalabi has his work cut out for him.

Iraqi politicians have used service ministries to promote themselves before, and some suspect that Chalabi took this post to reach a populace that rejected him in the 2006 election when he won no official seats in the government..

Since the fall of Saddam's regime, Chalabi has held several jobs including deputy prime minister, head of the de-Baathification committee and chairman of several investigative committees.

"I think Ahmad is trying to come back through this committee. But the reality is that there has been no action," said Mithal Alusi, a secular member of the parliament. "We Iraqi don't accept this."

But Chalabi's supporters reject that, saying he is the best suited to work with several ministries. And Hussein al Shaheen, a Chalabi advisor, said the government chose him because "everyone knows he can do it."

As he met with residents of Arab Jabour concerned about security and basic services, however, it was Chalabi the historian speaking, not Chalabi the ombudsman.

He reminded them that Alexander the Great once traveled through their neighborhood and that, at one point, 600,000 people lived in the area.

"We have a doctor among us," one resident remarked politely.

Minutes later, another muttered: "He cannot help us."

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#14  "No common agenda, no common direction
...defined results" + "Want Government to help them ... [but] Government does nothing" > ISN'T THIS WHAT OSAMA, i.e. HIDDEN IMMAMS/MAHDIS = MESSIAHS, etc. are for??? MOUDIAN -ISLAMIST APOCALYPSE > Even iff Osama + Radical Islamists in the present should fail or only partially succeed, would NOT a TRUE IMMAM/MAHDI correct and finish the job for them, for "doing the right/just thing" "in the name of God-Heaven"???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-29 18:06  

#13  1 the opening paragraphs of this article imply that Chalabi is being pushed by the US, when the article actually shows that he was selected by Maliki, which makes sense in terms of his Shiite orientation.

2. From what I understand, he did a decent job as Oil Minister. He may have no real political support in Iraq, he may be a snake oil salesman and be unreliable, but he seems to be a decent administrator by Iraqi standards.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2007-10-29 16:39  

#12  They do not understand local government and community activism, prohibited under Saddam's tight control. Several Iraqi women have toured the rural regions of the Midwest,& were pleasantly surprised at their own preconceived notions, but were especially interested in the local schools and farmers markets. One woman even teaches elementary kids Arabic in an Amish town, in a positive but unusual cultural exchange! I don't know how this could be implemented on a larger scale IMMEDIATELY, but educating the refugees and returning them to rebuild may inspire and teach the dregs that are left there. How about micro loans to buy dumpsters and garbage trucks and skidloaders for a landfill so they can start their own small businesses instead of paying security billions more?
Posted by: Danielle   2007-10-29 13:33  

#11  "With no U.S. or Iraqi forces in this almost exclusively Sunni neighborhood since the fall of Saddam's regime"

And that, ladies and gents, is why we almost failed.
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-10-29 12:42  

#10  "how effing useless the Iraqi government continues to be."
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-10-29 11:03  

#9  That the U.S. and Iraqi officials are again turning to Chalabi, this time to restore life to Baghdad neighborhoods, speaks to his resiliency in this nascent government.

No, it speaks to what a gigantic sack of shit the entire Iraqi parliament is. The one single repetitive theme throughout this entire article is how effing useless the Iraqi government continues to be. With its popularity so non-existent, this is a golden opportunity to disband the entire sideshow, stop the inmates from running the asylum and install a new bunch of goons who will take their marching orders from us and never, ever even dream of installing an iota of shari'a law. Had we the wisdom to do this, there might be a chance of realizing some of America's most vital security goals in the MME (Muslim Middle East). Scrubbing the region clean of theocratic Islam should be our top priority. It is what entrenches the most pernicious forms of graft and corruption, breeds up the very worst scum and drives global terrorism.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-29 10:54  

#8  Ironically, in the long run, the lack of a strong central government may prove to be a good thing.

Back in the founding of the US, the federalists first had their chance, and did much to get the local and State government running smoothly. Only then did the anti-federalists step in to get the central government working and efficient. It was much easier to do with State power pushing it up than dragging it down.

A strong foundation, as it were. In Iraq, now that the people are creating much better local and regional governments, it is approaching the time when the central government can be the capstone--not, like it is in so many failed states, the only government that works.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-10-29 10:45  

#7  Actually Chalabi never went away. He has held a number of cabinet level positions and has generally been recognized as a good technocrat. The problem is he doesn't have the personality to be a "man of the people" so he doesn't do well in elections even though he seems to have administrative ability.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2007-10-29 10:39  

#6  It is time for the military to start pulling back from the infrastructure type missions in Baghdad. Pay those people to do it and make them.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-10-29 09:32  

#5  Look, as per a post from yesterday, these people will not even pick up their own garbage, they stand around with their thumbs up their asses waiting for our Marines to do it. Show me the politician ANYWHERE who brags about making it to the top by getting the sewers fixed. I don't think even Bob Byrd ever bothered to get a sewage pumping station named after himself in WV...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2007-10-29 08:51  

#4  No, mrp, I am not confident N'Awlins does have a lower crime rate than Baghdad right now. At least not on a per capita basis. Our population is less than 10% that of Baghdad, so our murder rate would be roughly the same as 10 per day in Baghdad. I don't know what they average, but I do know it makes the news when it hits double figures or more there.

Baghdad may be a bit ahead of us in corruption though. Nagin is kind of weird, and not very competent, but he doesn't seem corrupt (to me). Now as to the school board ......, well, Baghdad's school system may be ahead of ours.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-10-29 08:23  

#3  U.S. officials maintain that it's up to New Orleans' government to provide its citizens with longer-term stability. Residents agree, especially when it comes to services beyond the capability of neighborhood councils, such as providing electricity, bringing doctors back into neighborhoods, establishing and paying a police force and building a school system, Traditionally, New Orlean's city government delivered these services.

N' Owlins might have a lower crime right than Baghdad's, though.
Posted by: mrp   2007-10-29 08:05  

#2  The obvious problem in Iraq is that there is no common agenda, no common direction. Some are in the government for power and control, others for change, but everyone, for this to work, should be in it for defined results. More power, better water and sewage, the end of terrorism, available healthcare, jobs, schools, and safe streets. The major problem with third world cultures is graft and corruption. That's what keeps them from development. That along with their retarded religion, but not many Iraqis are of the overly pious jihad-r-us variety.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-10-29 07:48  

#1  Smart enough to stay bought?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2007-10-29 07:10  

00:00