You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Craig's stance untenable
2007-10-08
Sen. Larry Craig would like to rewind the tape of the past several months, and respond differently to the embarrassing events that threaten his political career. But a Minnesota judge has shot down the Idaho Republican's only chance for a do-over, ruling that Craig can't retract the guilty plea he entered in August to a charge of disorderly conduct. Craig can't change the past - which means he has no future in the Senate.

Craig insists he's the victim of a misunderstanding at best, or entrapment at worst. If he's sincere about that, he has made the wrong moves at every turn. He should have objected strongly to his arrest in June, when he was accused of soliciting sex in a restroom at the Minneapolis airport. He should have fought a reduced charge of disorderly conduct, rather than pleading guilty in August. He should have insisted on his fitness to serve in the Senate, rather than saying he would resign if his attempt to overturn his guilty plea was denied.

Craig did not begin acting like the victim of an injustice until no other option remained. Instead, he has given the appearance of a man who is always looking for the easy way out: not standing up to a criminal charge he now claims was unfair, entering a plea he now says was false, hoping the whole episode would never come to light and then, at last, posing as the party who has been wronged. Now Craig says he will stay in the Senate, both to clear his name and to represent the people of Idaho.

It's not clear how Craig can do either. The disorderly conduct rap remains on Craig's record, and his chances of having it expunged are dim - his first attempt has now been rebuffed, and Craig signed documents indicating that he understood what he was doing when he entered his plea of guilty. Craig's Republican colleagues have stripped him of his leadership positions in the Senate, markedly reducing his opportunities to influence legislation on his constituents' behalf. The embarrassment for Craig, his party, his state and the Senate won't subside any time soon, because the Ethics Committee is conducting a preliminary inquiry that will keep the story alive.
Posted by:Fred

#6  Word is that today it was announced that Craig is going into Idado's Hall of Fame. No word if the walls extend to the floor.....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-10-08 14:19  

#5  Welcome to the Burg, Teddy. Would you like a drink?
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2007-10-08 12:00  

#4  We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
Posted by: Senator Teddy Kennedy   2007-10-08 10:19  

#3  Craig's stance untenable

I thought it was wide?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-10-08 09:01  

#2  Craig can't change the past - which means he has no future in the Senate.

Which is good news! How quickly can we chuck the remaining 99 into the dustbin of history?
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-10-08 07:41  

#1  Entrapment isn't illegal, as long as the targets are persons with a clear intent on law-breaking. The police unit whose member arrested Craig, acted on public complaints of serial offenses in the location they chose to work. If there is something wrong with a cop doing his job, then there is something wrong with a society where a majority that thinks that way.
Posted by: McZoid   2007-10-08 04:08  

00:00