You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Missile defense system is up and running, military says
2007-10-03
WASHINGTON: After a successful test last week, the tracking radars and interceptor rockets of a new American missile defense system can be turned on at any time to respond to an emerging crisis in Asia, senior military officers said Tuesday.

General Victor Renuart Jr., the senior commander for defense of United States territory, said that the antimissile system could guard against the risk of ballistic missile attack from North Korea even while development continues on a series of radars in California and the Pacific Ocean and on interceptor missiles in Alaska and California.

While the new system is limited, it is the most extensive anti-ballistic missile system the Pentagon has fielded since the Safeguard ABM system near Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota was briefly operated, starting in 1975. Congress immediately voted to shut it down, and it operated for only a few months.

"We can bring missiles up or take them down as need be so that they can continue doing the testing," said Renuart, commander of the military's Northern Command, based in Colorado Springs. But, he added, "I'm fully confident that we have all of the pieces in place that, if the nation needed to, we could respond."

He said the system showed an initial capability in July 2006, when American missile defense went on alert as North Korea staged missile tests. Because the array of interceptors and radars remains under development, it has never received the military's official status of being an operational weapons system.

Renuart spoke during a Pentagon news briefing on Tuesday that offered a recap of a missile defense test held on Friday that was deemed a success.

Lieutenant General Henry Obering III, director of the Missile Defense Agency, said the target missile was launched from Kodiak Island, Alaska, and tracked by radar at Beale Air Force Base, near Sacramento. The interceptor missile was fired from Vandenberg Air Force Base, north of Santa Barbara, California, scoring a direct hit on the dummy warhead.

"Does the system work? The answer is yes to that," Obering said. "Is it going to work against more complex threats in the future? We believe it will."

Obering acknowledged that no decoys were flown in the path of the interceptor on Friday as might be expected in a real missile attack. Skeptics have challenged the Missile Defense Agency to conduct more realistic tests that would include even primitive technologies designed to fool the interceptor. These include balloons and chunks of metal that separate from the missile along with the warhead.

The general said the next test, which is expected in the first half of 2008, would include countermeasures to gauge the interceptor's ability to differentiate between the real warhead and decoys. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice are scheduled to meet up in Moscow later this month for joint talks with their counterparts on Russia's objections to American proposals for missile defense in Central Europe. American plans call for 10 missile interceptors in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic to defend against a possible missile attack from Iran.

Obering said Friday's successful test would help make the Bush administration's case with allies.

"I think it helps us in a very real way, because, as I have had conversations with our European partners and allies and NATO partners in the past, one of the questions I do get asked is, well, this system is not proven," Obering said. And this, he added, goes a long way "to answering that question."
Posted by:Delphi

#12  Joe's on a roll
Posted by: Percy Glusoting9443   2007-10-03 23:44  

#11  REDDIT?TOPIX > BLACKWATER MOVES TOWARDS DIRIGIBLES. Unmanned, Nano-Techy, Multi-purpose, and eventually ARMED. Walking-on-ground armed Terrorists are just so much weird-looking Commie missles???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-03 23:10  

#10  2007 and GLOBAL MISSLE DEFENSE > Russia's SHKVAL hyper-velocity torpedo > The Russians have already admitted that they intend to continue and expand the SHKVAL concept to LR strategic capabilities, plus are dev their own UNDERWATER SUBMERSIBLE VEHICLES [armed/attack]. Besides, so-called SATURATION ATTACKS to defeat US GMD, point or en masse, THE UNDERWATER OCEAN = UW LINEAR DISTANCE BTWN ORIGIN + TARGET POINTS IS ITSELF NOW A DIMENSION OF STEALTH = COVER FOR ANTI-US STRATEGIC ATTACK. E.G. "SPIDER" naval design, etal. > Amers should be expecting more strange-looking, non-traditional ship designs for future naval surface and UW ship units. GLOBAL SEA DEFENSE > SHKVAL + 3D-plus BATTLESPACE SPAWAR > in future, DECISIVE NAVAL BATTLES + BMD MAY BE DECIDED UNDERWATER, NOT JUST VIA SURFACE OR SPACE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-03 19:36  

#9  No, the Russ long before were quietly planning to [eventually] deploy ABM/BMD Systems beyond only Air Defense. "Pooped themselves" > more correct to say Amer defeated them ala CUBAN CRISIS, beat them in Space and Moon race, were winning in Vietnam, + now beat them wid ABM. BREZHNEV > began the post-Cuba Soviet military buildup and modernization, dedicating the USSR to a minima of PARITY iff NOT SUPERIORITY vv USA-NATO. Unknown to the West, pre-Brezhnev the Soviets did not trust the bulk of their own strategic missle and targeting systems despite their Commie rhetoric to the contrary.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-03 19:22  

#8  It only slightly works against single launch threats. It must be defunded and removed!!! Give all the money to widows and orphans that we will create!
/dhimocrats


There, fixed it for ya
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-10-03 17:52  

#7  Oh how I dearly wish they had announced that we'd lied and there were actually 11,000 interceptors deployed, rather than just 11.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2007-10-03 17:22  

#6  Again with the harping about decoys. These critics seem to think that the engineers who design these systems are stupid.
Posted by: moody blues   2007-10-03 14:38  

#5  One of my friends was the information officer for Safeguard. He said that the RADAR had to be continuously working in order to retain its integrity (late 1960's technology). After they turned it off, it wouldn't work if it was turned back on. The 64 missiles were basically souped-up, nuclear-tipped Nikes. It came online in September, 1975, and was forced to shut down the same month by a Democratic congress. President Ford tried to talk them out of it, but failed.

The Dhimmicrats have been traitors ever since 1932 and the Roosevelt Administration. Why should it be a surprise now?
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-10-03 13:42  

#4  We will again hear the "It won't protect against a "suitcase nuke" or a nuke in a shipping container. I call this the "Your cancer cure is useless since it does nothing about the flu!" argument...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2007-10-03 12:23  

#3  Didn't the Ford administration bargain the Safeguard system away? Or did the post Watergate Congress composed of radical dimocrats unilaterally give up the system?
Posted by: Galactic Coordinator Shins1195   2007-10-03 11:21  

#2  It only slightly works against single launch threats. It must be defunded and removed!!! Give all the money to widows and orphans!
/dhimocrats
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-10-03 10:34  

#1  Boy, did they skip over some big historical events there. Safeguard was built in secret by Richard Nixon, and when he announced that it was complete and fully functional, the Russians about pooped themselves. They had no idea.

Since they couldn't afford to build a real ABM system, they overnight created a *fake* one, which was enough for the US to agree on the SALT-1 treaty that only preserved the tiny amount of anti-missile defenses for Moscow that the Russians could afford.

But the Democrat congress decided we didn't need any at all, so threw away our $500B system.

Imbeciles. Just what they are planning to do with our current, new, missile defenses.

I guess they won't be satisfied until all the blue States are wiped out with nuclear weapons.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-10-03 10:11  

00:00