| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks |
| Our followers ‘must live in peace until strong enough to wage jihad’ |
| 2007-09-08 |
| One of the world’s most respected Deobandi scholars believes that aggressive military jihad should be waged by Muslims “to establish the supremacy of Islam” worldwide. Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani argues that Muslims should live peacefully in countries such as Britain, where they have the freedom to practise Islam, only until they gain enough power to engage in battle. His views explode the myth that the creed of offensive, expansionist jihad represents a distortion of traditional Islamic thinking. Mr Usmani, 64, sat for 20 years as a Sharia judge in Pakistan’s Supreme Court. He is an adviser to several global financial institutions and a regular visitor to Britain. Polite and softly spoken, he revealed to The Times a detailed knowledge of world events and his words, for the most part, were balanced and considered. He agreed that it was wrong to suggest that the entire nonMuslim world was intent on destroying Islam. Yet this is a man who, in his published work, argues the case for Muslims to wage an expansionist war against nonMuslim lands. Mr Usmani’s justification for aggressive military jihad as a means of establishing global Islamic supremacy is revealed at the climax of his book, Islam and Modernism. The work is a polemic against Islamic modernists who seek to convert the entire Koran into “a poetic and metaphorical book” because, he says, they have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology. The final chapter delivers a rebuke to those who believe that only defensive jihad (fighting to defend a Muslim land that is under attack or occupation) is permissible in Islam. He refutes the suggestion that jihad is unlawful against a nonMuslim state that freely permits the preaching of Islam. For Mr Usmani, “the question is whether aggressive battle is by itself commendable or not”. “If it is, why should the Muslims stop simply because territorial expansion in these days is regarded as bad? And if it is not commendable, but deplorable, why did Islam not stop it in the past?” He answers his own question thus: “Even in those days . . . aggressive jihads were waged . . . because it was truly commendable for establishing the grandeur of the religion of Allah.” These words are not the product of a radical extremist. They come from the pen of one of the most acclaimed scholars in the Deobandi tradition. Mr Usmani told The Times that Islam and Modernism was an English translation of his original Urdu book, “which at times gives a connotation different from the original”. |
| Posted by:john frum |
| #3 The work is a polemic against Islamic modernists who seek to convert the entire Koran into “a poetic and metaphorical book” because, he says, they have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology. Which, just like the the shouting against apostasy, suggests the Ummah has a real movement to be concerned about beyond our view. Whether or not it will be enough is an open question. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-09-08 23:41 |
| #2 Mr. Usmani needs a slug and has just joined the list: 1. Osama bin Laden 2. Ayman al-Zawahiri 3. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 4. Ayatolla Kahmeini 5. Mullah Muhammad Omar 6. Abu Bakar Ba'asyir (Bashir) 7. Moqtada Sadr, 8. Abu Hamza al-Masri, 9. Mullah Krekar (AKA: Abu Sayyid Qutb), 10. Khaled Meshal 11. Sheikh Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah 12. Ismail Haniya 13. Mohammed Abbas 14. Yusuf al-Qaradawi 15. Tariq Ramadan 16. Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali 17. imam Omar Bakri Mohammed 18. imam Abdel-Samie Mahmoud Ibrahim Moussa 19. imam Sheikh SyeSyed Mubarik Ali Gilani 20. Sheikh Abdullah al-Faisal 21. Sheik Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi 22. Dr. Mahmoud al-Zahar 23. Prince Sultan Ibn Abd al-Aziz 24. Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz 25. Prince Nayef bin Abdulaziz 26. Muhammad Taqi Usmani Yes, it's gone beyond two-dozen and all of you must know how that just rips my heart out. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-09-08 23:06 |
| #1 These words are not the product of a radical extremist. They come from the pen of one of the most acclaimed scholars in the Deobandi tradition. Oh. There's a difference? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2007-09-08 22:32 |