You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Perv: Pakistan must get rid of al-Qaeda, Taliban
2007-09-07
(Xinhua) -- Terrorism is spawned by al-Qaeda, foreign terrorists and some elements of Taliban, and Pakistan must get rid of them, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf said on Thursday.
Like you're doing with the Mehsuds, Perv?
Musharraf made the remarks at a TV program at the President's House here on Thursday. Although the army was mainly for meeting the external threats
... and not very good at that...
but it was also the duty of the army to counter the internal threats, Musharraf said.
Barring the establishment of a competent internal security force. But the army's no great shakes, either.
He added that the army could be withdrawn from Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) if there was an assurance that all foreign terrorists would leave the area and there was a complete end to militancy.
If you exercise sovreignty over the country, the army is garrisoned where you need to put it, not withdrawn from where local bad guys declare no-go areas. There's no other country in the world that would put up with that situation.
Lebanon.
Whoops. My bad. No other functional country.
Musharraf vowed that Pakistan would not be allowed to become a soft state where foreign terrorists could seek a safe haven.
Then his lips fell off. Pakistain just happens to be crawling with domestic and foreign terrorist cooties. It's World Terror Central. Each and every major act of international terrorism in the past six years (at the very least) has had a Pakistain connection.
He said a holistic strategy was pursued to counter extremism and combat terrorism, and there were some misguided elements opposing the government's policy to make Pakistan a secure and prosperous country.
"Holistic." Is that a synonym for "convoluted, counter-intuitive, and ineffectual"?
A four-pronged strategy had been adopted in dealing with the malaise. Terrorism was being dealt with a strong military force
Like in either Wazoo...
while extremism tackled through a prudent approach, Musharraf said,
That's not even a sentence. I'm not even sure it's a sentence fragment.
adding that a political strategy was aimed at weaning away the people from extremists and isolating them, coupled with administrative and development steps to overcome the menace of extremism and terrorism.
Still haven't gotten to the point where you're willing to kill just as many of them as they want to kill of your side, and just as ruthlessly? That tells me you're still trying to work your backroom deals to keep some of them in your pocket as tools to torment your neighbors.
Musharraf warned that obscurantist views were spilling over into the settled districts which must be stopped.
He's still using present tense to describe things that should be in past imperfect.
Posted by:Fred

#3  Anyone who deals with them comes to realize within a week that they lie for the sake of lying, even if it's to their tactical or strategic disadvantage; it's so much a cultural characteristic by now as to be pretty much unconscious.

Welcome to the downside of taqiyya. Much like cheating in chess, your wins don't rely upon skill so much as seizing the opportunity to cheat. Allowing yourself to cheat destroys all development of genuine ability.

So it is with taqiyya. Allowing oneself the lax morals and ethics that countenance taqiyya breeds up a dependence upon unfair advantage which stifles intellectual development and the achievement of excellence. Over-reliance upon plausible deniability inculcates a fatal sloppiness inherent in avoiding signature grade work. Taqiyya represents the ultimate in lack of personal responsibility. Transposed to a national level, one gets the mayhem and chaos currently known as Pakistan. Small wonder they are a hub of international terrorism. Little else could arise from such a philosophical cesspool.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-07 16:41  

#2  It goes way beyond that. The turbans represent Pakistain's most effective means to project state power. Their army's pretty much useless and their air force is plagued by Inshallah maintenance. They've got nukes, but everybody else who has any has more.

The Pak oligarchy's self-image is that of subtle, genius-level masterminds, pulling strings of plausible deniability. Their objectives are to establish suzerainity over Afghanistan and to break up India, first taking the chunks that are Muslim for themselves, then imposing Islam on the remnants. Somewhere in the process they intend to reabsorb the Babus of Bangla.

The Pak oligarchy's actuality isn't nearly as subtil as they think it is. Anyone who deals with them comes to realize within a week that they lie for the sake of lying, even if it's to their tactical or strategic disadvantage; it's so much a cultural characteristic by now as to be pretty much unconscious. They're clumsy and they're crude and any martial qualities they might have started out with in 1947 have by now been eroded by their penchant for awarding themselves land grants, business interests, and government sinecures. The Spartans avoided the easy life; the Punjabis use their military as a method of seeking it.

As a result, they stiffen their ranks with Pastoons, which brings with it another set of problems. In Pashtunistan ignorance is considered a virtue, brutality something to be admired. And of course there's the religion thing; they take it much more seriously than the whisky-drinkin' pseudo-Brits of the Punjab elite. That makes for real fierce warriors and such - viz., the Mehsuds - but modern armies work because of technology and discipline. A love of explosives and the willingness to bonk your head on the floor five times a day whilst bowing toward Mecca aren't the same thing.
Posted by: Fred   2007-09-07 10:40  

#1  Perv knows if he gets rid of the militants the US/West would not need him anymore.Its in his interest to make the West scared so he can stay in power!!!
Posted by: Paul   2007-09-07 06:54  

00:00