You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Former NSA Officer: Bosnia is Euro Terror Center
2007-08-28
For many, the war in Bosnia in the 1990s was an event where bane, unthinkable opposites often found symbiosis: journalism and propaganda, fairness and subjective bias, objectivity and selective reportage, spiritual piety and murder of innocents... The aim was to make the version of history Sarajevo's Muslims, indeed Muslims across the world, were alleging an accepted dogma among the policy makers in the West.
The Clintons waged war against Serbs, in order to induce nominal Muslim support for their Middle East surrenders to Hizbollah, Hamas and al-Qaeda. Since their partial intervention and bloody engagement in Bosnia and Serbia (Kosovo province) against a fraternal people, the Islamofascist tyrannies in those terror entities have all but eradicated Christian minorities. Churches can be neither built nor renovated in either place. And that is happening as Saudis have financed the rebuilding of Ottoman mosques, on Wahabi blueprints.
In his new book, Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qaeda, and the Rise of Global Jihad, author John Schindler, a veteran intelligence officer for the ultra-secret National Security Agency (NSA), warns of the dangers of half-truths politicians and journalists flaunt about Bosnian war and admits that, had he not been a spy, he would swallow the Bosnian Muslim propaganda without indigestion.

"[L]ike so many others who followed the Balkan conflagration with a mix of horror and attraction, deep down I wanted Sarajevo's version of the truth to be reality," writes John Schindler.

With the luxury of being in the front seat of the information flow and a spy himself who gathered the information first hand by traveling to Bosnia on numerous occasions, the author John Schindler challenges established beliefs about Bosnia and warns America of its wanton cheer leading for the claims on history Muslims make: What Afghanistan has been to Al-Qaeda in the 1980s so is Bosnia in the 1990s, a battleground where Jihadists perfected their terror tactics then used them on America on 9/11.

"It is no coincidence," writes the author "that since the mid-1990s a distressing number of the most wanted terrorists around the globe turned out to have cut their teeth in the Bosnian crucible."

The two out of the 19 hijackers on the 9/11 airplanes are veterans of the Bosnian Jihad and served as soldiers in the Bosnian Muslim army.
Osama bin-Laden: Thank you Bill and Hillary.
"Disillusioned and embittered by the gross shortcomings of our 'best and brightest' and nearly everything they said about Bosnia, I swore to tell the real story someday, when I was free to do so," says Schindler. "The time is now."

The risk that John Schindler, the author, now faces is the fate of academics that ventured to challenge the prevailing dogma about Bosnia.

Cees Weibes, for example, has long been shelved as undesirable by the editors of major media houses because of his findings, similar to Schindler's, that Bosnia may have been a civil war from a perspective of a Westerner but for the Islamic world and Muslims of Bosnia, that war was Jihad, a holy war to spread Islam. By contrast, policy makers write odes about authors like Noel Malcolm whose half-truths about that Bosnian conflict have turned up, among other places, in senile ranting on theories of Statecraft by once sane Margaret Thatcher.
Bosnia was the Clinton's jihad puppy. Now it is a mad dog.
"I took an oath to protect [America's] secrets to the grave. I am confident that when the U.S. government sees fit to declassify and release its impressively full archive of intelligence about Bosnian war and the Balkan Jihad, decades hence, this account [of his book] will be confirmed and amplified," writes undaunted Schindler...
We will either end our partisanship with Bosnia and Kosovo terror entities now, or we will pay for the consequences later.
Posted by:McZoid

#5  If I may ask, Blackbeard Elmomosh9893: what's your background on this subject? And let me add to Zenster's welcome! :-D
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-08-28 20:57  

#4  The Sbernica atrocities were the result of pre-NATO imbecilities committed by the Council on Security and Co-operation in Europe. In fact of brazen Islamofascist cleansing of Serb and Croat minorities, the CSCE created a "protected zone" around Sbernica. Captive Muslim commanders admitted in International War Crimes Tribunal process, that they used CSCE/UN protection as a cover for terror. The Hague was so embarassed by same that, under Muslim pressure, they immediately released Muslim Ghazi (warrior) Oric, AFTER convicting him of facilitation of "Murder." He first flew to Albania, to a hero's welcome. We fought the wrong side in Kosovo; we backed the wrong side in Bosnia. We advanced tyranny in the name of freedom.

http://www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/051.shtml
Posted by: Blackbeard Elmomosh9893   2007-08-28 19:01  

#3  Serbs are perfectly capable of protecting themselves---as long as "NATO" stays out of it.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-08-28 17:51  

#2  It is by no means impossible that we will see a second Kosovo war - this time with NATO fighting against the Albanians to protect the Serbs and other minorities.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-08-28 15:56  

#1  I could never trust the mainstream media after Bosnia and Kosovo. They did not tell the whole truth. It was all a one-sided picture of those evil Serbs committing genocide and ethnic cleansing against those poor, innocent Bosnians and Kosovar Albanians. They never talked about churches being burned and they still never do. They never uttered the word "Islam". They never bothered to go into the history of sectarian violence in the the Balkans. They never gave an honest justification for Clinton's intervention.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-08-28 15:44  

00:00