| Submit your comments on this article |
| Europe |
| Fjordman : How the West Lost the Cold War |
| 2007-08-27 |
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #5 Okay-y-y, so is Society so "tolerant" it can NOT even tolerate tolerance??? Tolerant to the point of pan-Societal super-passivity and in danger of becoming a danger to our own way of life and existence? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-08-27 21:40 |
| #4 All that awaits us is for feminazis to march through the streets in defense of FGM (Female Genital Mutilation.) Er.. I think that has already happened, indirectly. Just ask around on any |
| Posted by: N Guard 2007-08-27 18:05 |
| #3 He understood “the infamous spiritual terror which this movement exerts, particularly on the bourgeoisie, which is neither morally nor mentally equal to such attacks; at a given sign it unleashes a veritable barrage of lies and slanders against whatever adversary seems most dangerous, until the nerves of the attacked persons break down and, just to have peace again, they sacrifice the hated individual … Conversely, they praise every weakling on the opposing side, sometimes cautiously, sometimes loudly, depending on the real or supposed quality of his intelligence.” Yet, somehow liberals are entirely unable to detect this exact same methodology when it is utilized by a group of Hitler’s most ardent admirers. This goes well beyond irony and into the realm of wholly catastrophic fatalism. I’ll also note how this is the exact same model used today by anti-American academics and other subversive forces within The United States. Decades of being told—“There is no right or wrong”, “Logic and reason are dependent upon circumstances”, “Truth is conditional”, "There is no black and white, only shades of gray”—have finally come home to roost in generations of youth who are totally disarmed and “neither morally nor mentally equal to such attacks” as Islam and liberalism now perpetrate against the West. Serge Trifkovic in his book The Sword of the Prophet documents how al-Husayni recruited Bosnian and Albanian Muslims for Waffen SS units in the Balkans. Nice to see Trifkovic get some notice. Please be sure to read his excellent disquisition about A Realist Strategy for fighting terrorism. Winston Churchill wrote about Adolf Hitler’s autobiography Mein Kampf: “Here was the new Koran of faith and war: turgid, verbose, shapeless, but pregnant with its message.” Winnie certainly had a way with words, didn’t he? “a civilisation that does not clearly proclaim its values, or which leaves these proclaimed values high and dry, is stepping on the path to perdition and terminal debility. Then others will pronounce their values, and in the mouths of these others they will no longer be values but just so many pretexts for untrammelled power, untrammelled destruction.” Which harkens directly back to my indictment of modern academics and their wholesale undermining of moral and spiritual certainty. As a direct result of their irrational doctrine, liberals are left “neither morally nor mentally equal to such attacks” and thereby represent the ultimate in ideological cannon fodder. In the old days this would be called treason. Now it’s called tolerance. No better description can be had of Multiculturalism’s covert agenda. Two Fascist-inspired movements cooperate on exploiting and abusing the native population of a country, force them [to] fund and applaud their own colonization and denounce them as bigots, racists and Fascists if they resist. The strategy is as brilliant as it is evil. And it is happening here in America as well. Do not be fooled. The West didn’t win the Cold War, at least not as decisively as we should have done. This becomes all the more clear as Islam is given increasingly free rein by liberals and Multiculturalists. How is it that the most successful socioeconomic model in all earth’s history—capitalism—has had such difficulty in finding its rightful Stentorian voice. If you have any doubts, please read Ayn Rand’s “Capitalism the Unknown Ideal”. That the captains of industry do not more vocally defend capitalism bespeaks an extremely sinister agenda reeking of greater allegiance to multinationalism than any vestige of patriotic character. Our traitor elite—both political and commercial—are rapidly abandoning America to the ravages of forces that would like nothing more than to see all of us rebellious survivors who withstood and won two World Wars to vanish into history’s dim recollection. We are the singular threat to totalitarianism and such an awkward and willful child cannot be tolerated by those who would rule the world. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-27 16:45 |
| #2 so we shouldn’t be surprised to see calls for the use of sharia law in family matters by an otherwise officially feminist party. “[S]urprised”? No. Appalled? Quite definitely. I can only suppose that Germaine Greer’s handiwork has not been for nothing. All that awaits us is for feminazis to march through the streets in defense of FGM (Female Genital Mutilation.) The “party is a threat to a Sweden that I believe many of us love — an open, unprejudiced and tolerant Sweden.” And to further that premise these morons are allying themselves with the absolute most close-minded, prejudiced and intolerant cretins on earth. No irony there, nosiree Bob. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-27 16:33 |
| #1 Sigh ... I'll need to post this in segments to discover which keyword is getting this post diverted. Here goes. “If we want to fight against capitalism, the working class needs to be united, and in order to be so intolerance cannot be tolerated. However, if we want to fight against intolerance we have to defeat capitalism as an extension of that struggle. Hence anti-fascism, feminism and the struggle against homophobia go hand in hand with the class struggle!” Does anyone else find it exceptionally In 1999, Aldebe proposed that sharia, Islamic law, be introduced in Sweden. In 2003 he involved himself in a heated debate regarding an incident of honor killing where a Kurdish girl was murdered by her two uncles. Aldebe forcefully defended the perpetrators and viewed the debate regarding honor-related murders as an attack against the Islamic religion. Debate? DEBATE??? What sort of discussion can there possibly be about premeditated murder? Yes, the punishment of first-degree murder—among many other repulsive features—is an “attack against the Islamic religion” and deservedly so. Were it not so dangerous, it would be hilarious in the extreme to see these totalitarian thugs ally themselves with this world’s uber-thugs. Little do they comprehend how theirs will be the first necks to be wrung once all other declared foes have been dispensed with. That these |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-27 16:31 |