You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Dupe URL: 'Obama might send troops into Pakistan
2007-08-01
Trailing wife and I posted at about the same time, so I've combined her comments into this post. AoS.
WASHINGTON - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday that he would possibly send troops into Pakistan to hunt down terrorists, an attempt to show strength when his chief rival has described his foreign policy skills as naive.
Like she wuz jes' sayin' ...
The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf that he must do more to shut down terrorist operations in his country and evict foreign fighters under an Obama presidency, or Pakistan will risk a U.S. troop invasion and losing hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. military aid.
Does Candidate Obama realize this is an overt act of war according to international law and custom?
No.
"Let me make this clear," Obama said in a speech prepared for delivery at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. "There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al-Qaida leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
Sure you will, uh-huh, and your fellow travellers in the progressive movement will let you 'invade the sovereignty' of Pakistan. Check with the Kos Kiddies in advance?
The excerpts were provided by the Obama campaign in advance of the speech.
ABC News offers an interesting, adjective filled analysis.
Obama said that as commander in chief he would remove troops from Iraq and putting them "on the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan." He said he would send at least two more brigades to Afghanistan and increase nonmilitary aid to the country by $1 billion.
We don't need two more brigades in Afghanistan. We have the Talibunnies sufficiently on the run to let the Afghans figure out how to run their country. They're not doing a great job, but there's no evidence that another billion in aid would change that. Karzai and his fellow warlords have to settle down and make the country work, doing all the mundane things that are generally not in the job description of a warlord -- schools, roads, sewers and blue-light districts as examples. This is just posturing from someone who has no real clue whatsoever about how our military works, how to use military force, and how to think strategically. And it shows.
He also said he would create a three-year, $5 billion program to share intelligence with allies worldwide to take out terrorist networks from Indonesia to Africa.
More posturing. This is what you do as a clueless Dhimmi -- throw money around and hope to impress the rubes at the Daily Kos that you're somehow serious. The Dhimmis do the same thing in domestic programs: if you spend one billion dollars you're serious, if you spend five billion you're really serious.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Thanks for the ABC-Tapper link, Fred.
Posted by: mrp   2007-08-01 17:30  

#6  Yeah, you guys, but when I was watching the Senate debate the withdrawal bill on C-Span this is exactly the impression I was getting from them. They want to redeploy to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Or, at least, they give that impression to try to make it look like they are not total surrender monkeys.
Posted by: Abu Uluque6305   2007-08-01 16:56  

#5  Remember who you're dealing with here.
Just cuz he says it, doesn't mean he means it.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-08-01 11:57  

#4  This clown thinks Iraq is a mess, but yet he is wants to invade Pakistan.

*Shakes head*
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-08-01 11:28  

#3  He also said he would create a three-year, $5 billion program to share intelligence with allies worldwide to take out terrorist networks from Indonesia to Africa.

Identify the key words and phrases in the above para.

Too late on the "troops in Pakland" donk! Others are way ahead of you.
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-08-01 11:26  

#2  Pure political posturing: Hillary! nailed him during the last candidate debate when she refused to commit (as Obama did), to a series of one-on-one meetings with various dictators, if elected president.

Since the debate, Clinton has significantly widened her approval margin over Obama. This indicates to me that the Dems are, despite the party's endemic BDS contagion, receptive to a pro-active foreign policy that is not entirely amenable towards totalitarian potentates.

The "over the border" statement is an attempt by Obama to out-flank Hillary! on the right; and it is rather indicative of the problems facing the Dems in 2008 - on the foreign policy front, there is no room to maneuver on the left. Moreover, the move seems to be confirmation that the President's policies in the ME and SW Asia are bearing fruit.
Posted by: mrp   2007-08-01 11:12  

#1  Obama said that as commander in chief he would remove troops from Iraq

Never mind that al Qaida says Iraq is the central battlefield in the war on terror. Never mind what giving up there would mean to America and to the Middle East. You may not be interested in war, Obama, but war in interested in you.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-08-01 11:02  

00:00