You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iranian militants demand return of British diplomatic compound
2007-07-18
Britain's tense relations with Iran are likely to be further strained next week by an officially linked campaign demanding the handover of the British embassy residence compound in Tehran. Hardliners will stage a conference demanding the return to Iran of Gholhak gardens, a 200,000 sq metre (50-acre) compound providing accommodation for British diplomats and their families.

The compound, in north Tehran's up-market Shemiran district, was presented to Britain at the height of its imperial might by the Qajar monarchy in the 19th century. It is separate from the sprawling British embassy complex several miles further south. Bordered by high walls and guarded round the clock by Iran's diplomatic police, the grounds are home to the British Council. They also contain a school and a graveyard, where the remains of British soldiers killed in the first and second world wars are buried.

But the hardliners say Britain's ownership was asserted illegally during the reign of Reza Shah in the 1930s.
Just another way of rattling the chains. Pinch a few sailors, make a few claims, fund a few boomers, that sort of thing ...
"During the Reza Shah period the British embassy, without going through the proper legal processes, registered this area under its name," Muhammad Mehdi Shirmohammadi, the conference secretary, told the Guardian. "This is while they could have bought it. They can buy it now if they like. But first they should accept that the historical process was wrong and then they are free to buy."

British diplomats have avoided commenting on the controversy. But organisers of the conference on Monday are seeking to end the official silence by inviting Geoffrey Adams, Britain's ambassador to Iran, to attend, along with Iranian experts in Islamic and civil law. A British embassy spokesman said Mr Adams had yet to decide whether to go. The event is being organised under the auspices of the Foundation for the Preservation and Publication of Sacred Defence Works and Values, a state body ultimately controlled by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Is the Foundation related to the Committee for the Preservation of Virtue and the Elimination of Vice?
The Foundation for the Preservation and Publication of Sacred Defence Works and Values houses this:
It follows a long-running campaign spearheaded by pro-government groups such as the Islamist Basij volunteer terrorists militia and fundamentalist MPs. Several demonstrations have been staged outside the gardens by militant student groups. Last year, 162 MPs wrote to the parliamentary speaker, Gholamali Haddad-Adel demanding an investigation into the gardens' status.

Last month MPs tabled a bill calling on the government to force Britain to return Gholhak and turn it into an anti-colonial museum. Iranian officials have been reported as saying they would be prepared to grant Britain ownership in exchange for Hyde Park in London.

The row is symbolic of the seething resentment felt by many Iranians towards Britain, which is still widely seen as an arrogant colonial power
in the newsroom and executive offices of the Guardian,
and comes amid a prolonged period of tension between the two countries, particularly over Iran's nuclear programme. Last month, Iranian guests attending the Queen's birthday party at the British embassy were harassed by demonstrators after an officially orchestrated campaign aimed at urging invitees to boycott it.

A British embassy spokesman said Iran had not mounted an official challenge to Britain's ownership of the gardens. "As far as we're concerned, there is no question about their ownership," he said. "Our lawyers have looked up all the proper legal documents and found no problem at all," he said.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  "They can buy it now if they like. But first they should accept that the historical process was wrong and then they are free to buy."


Instead of buying, they should simply retake the country and be done with--its long ago been demonstrated that Islam isn't compatible with self-government.
Posted by: Crusader   2007-07-18 17:03  

#6  "They can buy it now if they like. But first they should accept that the historical process was wrong and then they are free to buy."

And there you have the commercial history of the Islamic world in two simple sentences!
Posted by: Percy Snusotle2643   2007-07-18 12:09  

#5  So if the Iranians seize it, isn't that another Cassi Belli for England?
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-07-18 11:06  

#4  Several demonstrations have been staged outside the gardens by militant student groups.

Welcome to 1979, Brits! Please join us now in 2007!
Posted by: BA   2007-07-18 09:56  

#3  They can always count on the French.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-07-18 09:43  

#2  No, no. Mark Moloch Brown sez the Brits rely on us too much. They're going to rely on the Spanish in this one.
Posted by: Fred   2007-07-18 09:07  

#1  Brit's let us know when you need a partner to kick some ignorant asses
Posted by: Omavinter Scourge of the Sith   2007-07-18 08:36  

00:00