You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
8 Taliban killed in Afghan clashes
2007-07-18
Afghan troops clashed with suspected militants in eastern Afghanistan, just across the border from Pakistan, leaving several suspected militants dead and 10 Afghan soldiers wounded, a Defense Ministry statement said on Tuesday. In the south, a roadside blast killed three Afghan troops, while clashes left at least eight Taliban militants dead, officials said.

Near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, the body of a Pakistani militant was found in the battlefield on Monday near Bermel district of the Paktika province, while the wounded Afghan soldiers were evacuated to a nearby medical facility where they were listed in stabile condition, the statement said. The clash happened just across from PakistanÂ’s lawless North Waziristan region where a recent spate of attacks left more than 70 people dead, mostly police and soldiers.

The rising violence in the region comes as US officials say Al Qaeda is regrouping in that area. Pakistani authorities are scrambling to salvage a peace agreement between the government and village elders. Pro-Taliban militants had renounced the agreement following last weekÂ’s storming of Lal Masjid in Islamabad. US officials have repeatedly said that the North Waziristan deal has led to increased cross-border infiltration by militants.

In the southern province of Kandahar, militants clashed with NATO and Afghan troops on Monday, in a battle that left eight militants dead, said Sayed Agha Saqib, KandaharÂ’s police chief. There were no casualties among Afghan and NATO troops, and authorities recovered the militantsÂ’ bodies, Saqib said. In Helmand, a bomb attack on a vehicle carrying Afghan soldiers in Gereshk on Monday killed three troops and wounded two, said the provincial police chief. Southern Afghanistan has been hit by an Al Qaeda backed Taliban insurgency which has claimed thousands of lives and left an international reconstruction drive all but paralysed in war-torn areas.
Posted by:Fred

#6  Steve,

It seems to me we are beyond that. What the hell could the NYT/LAT/WaPo/NBC/CBS/ABC/NPR cabal say further that would be worse than what they have done to impede our safety and security as it is? Bush seems pretty thick skinned (although he did wimp out politically on Libby) but he is also a little tentative at times. If ISI types and the military replace Mushy what will they do that they haven't been able to do so far in the NWFP and Waziristan? Join forces with Taliban and AQ? Do you think they want a war with us? Especially since their tendency would be to point to their nukes and we then point to ours in subs, 52's and so on. It would be certain one-way MAD! I just think that sometimes you have to push the envelope just to understand the effect of doing that would "really" be not in theory but practice.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-18 12:00  

#5  Jack, we could do all that, just as long as you don't mind reading about in the NYT the next day with all the disapproving editorials and a long screed from Seymour Hersh as to how we're just making everything worse.
Posted by: Steve White   2007-07-18 10:45  

#4  A couple more Red Mosque type incidents and Perv is gonna have to slug it out with these people anyway.
Posted by: treo   2007-07-18 10:16  

#3  daughter, not widow
Posted by: Frank G   2007-07-18 09:24  

#2  We've been trying to prop up Musharaff in power, since the alternative is the ISI Taliban wing or the even more corrupt/inept widows of dictators past.

Overt action in the region stands a strong chance of bringing down his government. We'll end up doing it, but only because/when he is clearly failing anyway, I suspect.
Posted by: lotp   2007-07-18 08:49  

#1  What I have never understood about our resistance to going after AQ in NWFP and Waziristan is what are we afraid of? Not the Paki army since they don't, won't and can't even handle a littel dust up in those areas. With an airpower/specops there we can probably decimate the AQ/Taliban population and control the tribes. Why fear something that is not fearsome?
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-18 08:24  

00:00