You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Anarchists' picnic a melting pot of ideas
2007-07-02
Dead-tree media monkeys still trying to sanitize the disloyal opposition, this time with an idyllic fluff piece about a conclave of moonbats and terror-enablers near Pittsburg.
To someone walking through Schenley Park in Oakland
(PA, a suburb of Pittsburg)
yesterday, the gathering at the Anderson Pavilion might have looked like any other Fourth of July picnic -- food, kids, Frisbees and fun, even a three-legged race.
A scene straight out of State Fair, just plain folks those Anarchists.
Of course, there also was that big black banner with giant letters proclaiming "Anarchy."
"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?"
The third annual anarchist picnic -- an alternative Fourth of July event -- attracted about 85 people, more than in past years. It might be a reflection of the growing movement. Or it might have been just a really nice day.
85? 85! A flea circus or a ten percent discount on toilet paper would probably attract a bigger crowd than that in Pittsburg, yet the dead-tree monkey sees it as evidence of a growing movement.
Alex Bradley, 27, of Bloomfield, has been involved in all three of the picnics and was one of the three speakers who addressed the gathering, sharing the message of the voluntary association of individuals rather than life under a coercive government.
"Some animals are more equal than others" however.
"This is the largest anarchist event that happens in Pittsburgh each year, especially nonprotest," Mr. Bradley said. "It's an all-ages event, where everybody is welcome."
We want to start the indoctrination young.
Those attending were members of many socially minded projects in Western Pennsylvania, including the Thomas Merton Center, Pittsburgh Organizing Group, Free Ride, "Rustbelt Radio" and Food Not Bombs.
Yes, our arsenal of bombs, used to oppress Al Qaeda and other advocates of non-coercive association, has certainly led to widespread starvation in this country. We saw this in the emaciated bodies of Katrina victims.
"A lot of people here work on really different projects and they don't get the chance to interact a lot during the year," Mr. Bradley said. "One group feeds the homeless, another works for peace, others are involved in the political process. They have different, divergent purposes."
Anyone working to free Cuban political prisoners? End censorship in Venezuela? We know the answers.
Jessica McPherson, 27, of Garfield, works with "Rustbelt Radio," a weekly radio program that covers "news from the grass-roots that is overlooked by the corporate media."
"mostly because we make it up ourselves and they run only the stuff they make up," she added.
She's also part of Free Ride, a bicycle recycling program. "There are a lot of different groups and people with different ideas here, but there is an over-arcing similarity," she said. "And it's nice to get in touch with people with similar ideas who are doing similar work that I might not see day to day in the projects I work with.

"It's also nice to have an alternative celebration. There's a lot of blind patriotism about the Fourth of July and not a lot of introspection.
She knows this because, like most moonbats, she not only believes in clairvoyant powers but assigns great range and depth to her own, so much so that she reads millions of minds at at time.
People need to remember what it means. We're celebrating freedom, but are we taking away freedoms?
Quite a few AQ killers have had their freedom to breathe taken away, no thanks to these self-important wankers. We're celebrating democracy, but are we building democracy or damaging democracy?"
You are definitely damaging it, Jessica.
Mr. Bradley acknowledged that there is a "popular perception" about anarchists that works against them and their cause.
Also facts, history and logic but those are constructs of the white male hegemony anyway.
"We're pretty much like everyone else, when you get down to it," said Mr. Bradley, who works 40 hours a week in a post office. "We're not about living in the woods and writing crazy manifestos.
Postal? He probably pulls down about 100K a year from the gummint he wants to abolish and that oppresses him so.
"A lot of people think it's about violence, disorder, chaos, people doing whatever they want.
Why would the public think that anarchy is about violence, disorder and chaos?
But, at its root, it's about direct democracy. Anarchists are not anti-organization.
Again, some animals are more equal than others. They're anti-hierarchy. People get that confused because most organizations are hierarchical."
by definition in fact.
In fact, a little organization can be a good thing, he said, especially when putting together a picnic. "You need some communication and organization," he said. "That way we don't have 25 bags of chips.
Hey, they can organize a picnic, let's hand the country over to them.
"I would have preferred that there had been some hot dogs. But it's pot-luck and people can only bring so much. I ate a lot of brownies."
I'll bet, probably a lot of Oreos too.
And the anarchists' Fourth of July message? It's anything but anti-American.
We have a monkey's word for this, it must be true.
"Just because I have issues with the U.S. government now doesn't mean I want to bring the king of England back," Mr. Bradley said.
The Caliph of Cairo or the Commissar of Resource Allocation maybe, but not the King of England.
Posted by:Atomic Conspiracy

#23  Yes well, since we do have laws the police frown on other sorts of hitting. So the metaphorical "Clue Bat" was all I could use.

Posted by: Silentbrick   2007-07-02 20:30  

#22  Hitting them with logic was hardly fair, Silentbrick. ;)
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2007-07-02 18:28  

#21  So called Anarchists were fun in HS. I used to get them to talk about how there would be no laws, no police, etc, so they could do their drugs, then tell them if there was suddenly anarchy, the first thing I'd do would be hunt them down and shoot them. They'd immediately say, "You can't do that."
My reply was always, "No laws, no way to stop me."
Posted by: Silentbrick   2007-07-02 14:44  

#20  Anarchy worked in Somalia and Haiti, why not give it a try?

/snark
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-07-02 13:22  

#19  Another bunch of pinheads who fell asleep and missed the lecture in their Intro to Political Science course, I see.

Wonder if they have bylaws?
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2007-07-02 13:19  

#18  They are not Anarchists rather just deluded idiots.

Real anarchists don't organize. PERIOD!.

That say they can be really dangerous!

I remember a long discussion many years ago with a guest lecturer prof from Vermont or NH who claimed to be a WHITE Anarchist.

I was like WTF? So I asked him to explain.
He said: "White Anarchists don't believe in violence for any reason, Grey's sometimes and Black Anarchist's have no problem with it"

Okay, so I was about to ask how an Anarchist could subscribe to any theory and still be an Anarchist when he blurted out "I am sorry but I just can't do needles like you kids do."

WTF? Needles?

I finally figured out he was a drug addict scared of needles. His scam to pay for it was the lecture circuit ranting about White Anarchy.
Next he asked me where he could find some drugs. I looked at him and said: "For a favor to a cute girl I agreed to drive you to where you wanted. Cute is no longer enough. Which street corner in the next 2 blocks do you want to be kicked out of the car at."

Idiot!
Posted by: 3dc   2007-07-02 10:57  

#17  Yeah, anyone that can use the words pedantic and chickenshit in one sentence is ok in my book. Have another pot of coffee and scream it out, you'll be fine.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-07-02 10:31  

#16  IIRC, at various times in its history, Pittsburgh has been spelled without the "h." I knew which "Pittsburg" AC was referring to, so no biggie.
Posted by: Mike   2007-07-02 10:29  

#15  Agreed, Atomic Conspiracy, don't go, and don't stop posting. Us mods are s'posed to be the grammar police, and actually Mitch's travelogue was helpful in setting our tiny-fisted friends in their proper context, swaddled in the protective tree-coated Three Rivers Valley.
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-07-02 10:16  

#14  And you put "The conquest of cool" on my radar screen/to read list, with that intriguing notion of collusion between counterculture and mass media/mass consumerism.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-07-02 09:45  

#13  AC, you bring interesting stuff here both in articles and comments, don't go away on such a small remark, that would be a shame, IMHO.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-07-02 09:43  

#12  Fuck this. My last post.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2007-07-02 09:10  

#11  Yeah, Mitch, you pedantic chickenshit, there is a reason I called it "Pittsburg." It was an oversight, and I did it twice. So sue me.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2007-07-02 09:08  

#10  Anarchy would last long enough for the strong men to organize themselves into warlords.

But you see Anarchy would be enforced by the government so that anyone who rises up and tries to organize anything would be stopped!

It'll be an Anarchy Paradise man!

(Just like the Soviet Union was and North Korea is today!)
Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-07-02 08:51  

#9  Try nihilists, anonymous5089.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-07-02 08:38  

#8  Free Ride

Yeah. I'll take that one. Where do I sign up?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-07-02 08:35  

#7  Is it just me, or are the statements, "This is the largest anarchist event...", and "...everybody is welcome" contradictory?

How do anarchists organize? By default they crave anarchy.
Posted by: anymouse   2007-07-02 08:34  

#6  Is there some reason you keep calling Pittsburgh "Pittsburg"? Pittsburg's in Kansas.

Oakland isn't a suburb of Pittsburgh, it's the university district, the other side of the Hill District from Downtown. It's deep inside the city proper. All the greenspace might confuse someone unfamiliar with the city's rather unique development pattern. (There's a lot of vertical slopes in Pittsburgh which precluded development, which resulted in ravine-floor and ridgeline neighborhoods and steep wooded slopes in between, all the way into the heart of the city.)

Oakland's the home of the University of Pittsburgh & CMU. As such, it's the natural and concentrated centre of SW Pennsylvanian moonbattery. On the other hand, we haven't had real bomb-throwers in these parts since early in the last century. "Anarchists" in these parts are feeble-minded leftists who self-indentify with "left" Marxism who aren't Trotskyites. Think anarcho-syndicalism, not Bukunin anarchism.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2007-07-02 08:29  

#5  anonymous5089
You are correct, these are NOT anarchists, these are communists with a PR person.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan   2007-07-02 08:26  

#4  And a very vicious assassinations and random bombings spree in the late 19th century, ended only by WWI, including the complete destruction of a cathedral upon the believers. Anyway, why it is that when one refers to anarchism, it's always collectivist or leftist anarchism? To me, "true" anarchy would be anarcho-capitalism or right-wing anarchism, that is putting the self-reliant, free individual above the group, with the rule of law/contract to cover interactions between individuals and the group. But it seems that since its inception, anarchism always has been de facto accapared by the left, and has a terrible legacy to answer for.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-07-02 08:14  

#3  Anarchy would last long enough for the strong men to organize themselves into warlords.

And, frankly, someone should remind the press that anarchists gave us a presidential assassination and WWI.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-07-02 07:54  

#2  These are the very first idiots I'd flame if society really did degenerate into anarchy. Maybe they should think of that.
Posted by: Clalet Borgia5180   2007-07-02 07:51  

#1  ". . . . That way we don't have 25 bags of chips."

Which would be what - anarchy?

Posted by: GORT   2007-07-02 07:48  

00:00