You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Tribes help U.S. against al-Qaeda
2007-06-20
BAGHDAD - More than 10 Iraqi tribes in the Baghdad area have reached agreements with U.S. and Iraqi forces for the first time to oppose al-Qaeda, raising the U.S. military's hopes that a trend started in western Iraq is spreading here.
Some of the groups, which have members who fought alongside al-Qaeda in the past, have been providing useful intelligence to U.S. forces about their former allies, according to the U.S. military.

"They know where they live and who they are," said Lt. Col. Rick Welch, a staff officer who works with tribes in the capital area. "They know how they operate." Some tribes are also taking up arms against al-Qaeda allies.

About 100 tribes live in greater Baghdad. Many of these clans are groups of relatives who share the same name and have thousands of members.

U.S. commanders have reached similar deals in Sunni-dominated Anbar province in western Iraq. Attacks there have dropped by 60% in the last year, according to the U.S. military. Tribes in Diyala province north of Baghdad are also negotiating with U.S. forces, which have launched a major offensive in the region.

Most of the Baghdad tribes cooperating with U.S. forces are Sunni, Welch said, but he didn't have a specific breakdown.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said this week that his government objected to the arming of various tribes "because this will create new militias."

U.S. commanders are urging al-Maliki to bring the tribes into the legitimate security forces in order to avoid creating militias outside government control. "The goal is to tap into the movement, but not create a threat," Welch said. "If it continues and the government doesn't thwart it, it will be a huge event."

Iraq's government has started to recruit some Baghdad tribe members into the police, Welch said.

Tribal leaders in Baghdad are less influential than in Anbar.

"In Anbar, tribal engagement appears to be the answer," said Lt. Col. Douglas Ollivant, chief of plans for the American division in Baghdad. "In Baghdad it's not going to be the answer. It's going to be part of the answer."

The United States will keep working with al-Maliki's government, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said during a weekend visit to Baghdad, but it can't ignore the result from such "ground up" negotiations with tribes.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#3  maybe Al Q in Iraq finally started to run low of cash to bribe tribal leaders at the same time that Al Q was annoying the tribal leaders by implementing real sharia
Posted by: mhw   2007-06-20 22:07  

#2  I was hoping the Apaches, long docile on their reservations here in Arizona were going to be unleashed on the Iraquis to fulfill their cultural destiny.
Posted by: borgboy2001   2007-06-20 19:33  

#1  We are finally seeing the results of years of fighting, rebuilding, and talking to the tribes : they are switching to the government side because that is where all the major goodies are. For anyone who thinks this is something new, I would suggest that they read the history of the US Army and the Marine Corps : this is the standard small war/counter-insurgency/counter-tribal warfare model that the US has used for over 200 years. It is how we broke the Plains Indians, the Apaches, the Comanches, the Moro revolt in the Phillipines, the communist revolts in Guatemala in the 1930s, etc.
The advantage we had back then was that the media of the day was NOT a cheerleading section for the enemy, as it is today. Counter-insurgency warfare takes about 10 years to be completed successfully, but the Dhimmocrats and the media will only permit a 3 year period nowadays.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2007-06-20 17:30  

00:00