You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
New security shambles as three terror suspects go on the run
2007-05-24
Three terror suspects, including two brothers of an Islamic fanatic jailed for plotting mass murder, are on the run tonight. They had all been under control orders requiring them to report to the authorities every day.

Two of the men are Lamine Adam, 26, and Ibrahim Adam, 20, whose brother Anthony Garcia, 24, was jailed for life last month for his part in the fertiliser bomb plot. The third man is their associate Cerie Bullivant, 24.

Home Secretary John Reid, who faced fresh accusations that the Government's terror policy is a shambles, took the unprecedented step of naming the three after consultations with Scotland Yard. The fact that they were named - Ministers have resisted all attempts to identify three other control order suspects on the run - was seen as evidence of the urgent need to find them.

Opposition MPs said it was clear control orders could not protect the public.

Control orders were introduced as a compromise after the courts ruled that terror suspects could not be detained without trial. But successive home secretaries have suffered a series of human rights defeats which mean suspects can no longer be placed under virtual house arrest. Six in total have now gone on the run.

The Adam brothers, originally from Algeria, had been due to contact a monitoring company on Monday, but failed to do so. Bullivant failed to report to his local police station the following day.

Deputy assistant commissioner Peter Clarke, head of Terrorism Command for the Metropolitan Police, said: "They have breached the conditions of their control orders, which is a serious crime. We know that Lamine Adam, Ibrahim Adam and Cerie Bullivant are associates and may well be together. It is possible the public can help us trace them."

Mr Reid will make an emergency statement to Parliament tomorrow.

Security sources stressed that the men were under control orders because they were suspected of plotting atrocities overseas and said they were not an immediate danger to the public here. But their links to Garcia, who changed his name when he became a model, are certain to cause alarm. He was one of five men jailed for life last month for a bomb plot linked to Al Qaeda that could have killed hundreds of people.
Posted by:Pappy

#15  They appear in court and are told to come back in 60 days to determine if they will recieve deportation orders. Of course, they all willfully return to court. None do.

They're not expected to show up. It's all done with a nod and a wink. By design. If by some twisted miracle someone did show up, it would throw the whole court into a tizzie. The butchering of the great nation proceeds apace.
Posted by: Natural Law   2007-05-24 21:02  

#14  Childhood control orders: " You're grounded."
Y'all remember how well THAT worked......
Posted by: USN. Ret.   2007-05-24 14:10  

#13  "Catch & release" is one of the key strategies dedicated to losing the War on Terror, both domestically and abroad.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-05-24 14:08  

#12  Childhood control orders: " You're grounded."
Y'all remember how well THAT worked......
Posted by: USN. Ret.   2007-05-24 14:08  

#11  I see the "control orders" in Britain work as well as our technique here in US when dealing with illegals. They appear in court and are told to come back in 60 days to determine if they will recieve deportation orders. Of course, they all willfully return to court. None do. And yet, we can't seem to change this little technique of enforcment. Even a child of five playing a game, wouldn't release someone after they were caught.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970   2007-05-24 11:07  

#10  The last time I visited the States it took nearly 12 hours to convince the nice men at customs to let me in. I have family on Long Island - fancy being the deckchair assistant on Jones Beach. Mmmm.
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-05-24 11:06  

#9  Howard should brush up on his Spanish and his gardening skills...then he could come to the US...

;-)
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-05-24 10:26  

#8  But successive home secretaries have suffered a series of human rights defeats...

Can't violate their 'human rights', no siree Bob...
Posted by: Raj   2007-05-24 09:25  

#7  Gordon Brown will roll over like a poodle for the Islamofascists. However, the Tories under Cameron will be little better - they're completely mired in PC rhetoric these days.
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-05-24 07:57  

#6  Early afternoon, surely, Howard UK? What odds your new PM will be less gentle and understanding than dear Tony?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-24 07:41  

#5  Always there to rationalise my early a.m. hysteria, TW ;) We are asking for AQ to give us a right royal kicking tho'...
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-05-24 07:38  

#4  Nobody deserves a 9/11, Howard. But a car bomb or some grisly murders wouldn't surprise me. And yes, Security would be wise to forbid burqas and face veils in public until the War on Terror has been decisively won (although of course we're no longer using that term -- 'cause if we don't name it, it isn't happening).
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-24 07:15  

#3  Opposition MPs said it was clear control orders could not protect the public.

Damn right - but I think that internment could help. Sometimes I think we deserve a 9/11 here in London - just hope it's not in this part of town.
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-05-24 04:17  

#2  I hope these culturally over-sensitive dipwads don't forget about alerting airport security personnel to require the removal of all burqas at boarding gate checkpoints. How pathetic that the release of these new suspects' names actually represents a huge leap forward in their law enforcement practices.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-05-24 03:58  

#1  The same type of people who left them free to carry out whatever they may be planning want to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay.
Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723   2007-05-24 01:11  

00:00