You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Livni Asks Olmert to Quit
2007-05-03
Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni asked Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to quit but he brushed aside calls from her and other leading figures yesterday, acknowledging he was in a difficult position but vowing to fix his mistakes.
In other words, he's clinging to power until the absolute bitter end.
Olmert won a critical show of support from lawmakers within his ruling Kadima party — and forced the bloc’s parliamentary head to quit — two days after an official report blamed Olmert for “serious failures” in handling a war last year in Lebanon.
Kadima as a party's clinging to power in the hope they can pull something off, secure in the knowledge that once they're out they're never going to get in again, at least not until Attention Span Deficit Disorder kicks in.
“The prime minister enjoyed unprecedented support here,” Deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres said after three hours of intensive argument among the 29-strong parliamentary caucus.
That being the only place he's got any support...
The Kadima lawmakers had decided to “strengthen the coalition in order to maintain stability in the regime,” Israeli media said, with some declaring Olmert the victor in a showdown with the party’s deputy leader Tzipi Livni.
And Pyrrhus was the victor in his fight with the Romans...
Just two hours earlier, Livni had convened a news conference to reveal she had urged Olmert to quit and that she wanted his job.
Surely she can't be expecting to hold it for long? I guess "Prime Minister of Israel" is a pretty nice resume entry, but she's going to end up looking like a job hopper.
“I told the prime minister that I thought to resign was the right thing to do,” she told a riveted television audience.
Doing the right thing doesn't appear to be at the top of his list, does it?
But meeting lawmakers of the centrist party, Olmert, as quoted by a senior official, said: “I am in a personally uncomfortable position, but I will not shirk my responsibility and will fix all the mistakes.”
He's intentionally missing the point that he's the mistake.
KadimaÂ’s parliamentary leader Avigdor Yitzhaki resigned in protest when Olmert rejected his call to step down.
Olmert's ship of state's been hulled. There's water everywhere. Standing foursquare on the deck he hollered at Avigdor: "Y'wanna leave? Then fine! Go ahead and leave!" And Avigdor said: "Hokay."
Under KadimaÂ’s rules, Olmert cannot be ousted.
Under the rules of politix, clinging to power when your time has gone means your party's gonna take it in the shorts.
The only course of action is to persuade him to resign or to hold a primary which would take time to organize. Parliament could force Olmert out through a no-confidence vote but there does not yet appear to be a majority to do so.
I have no idea why not.
At an emergency Cabinet meeting earlier yesterday, where ministers voted to oversee implementation of changes recommended by the commission, Olmert acknowledged personal failings. But he said: “I suggest that all those who are in a hurry to take advantage of this report and make political gain — slow down.” Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said he hoped the turmoil in Israel would not set back efforts to restart peace talks.
Saeb's licking his chops at the thought of getting as much as possible from negotiations with a powerless government.
The two frontrunners to replace Olmert are Livni, 48, and Peres, 83. Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of the rightist Likud party, a favorite in opinion polls, could also pose a challenge if OlmertÂ’s government is toppled.
My guess, which probably doesn't count since I'm not privy to the inner workings of Israeli politix, would be that he'd win in a walk after Olmert's pathetic performance.
Some in Kadima, and among key coalition partners, such as the Labor party, have suggested they were sticking by Olmert out of concern of losing significant parliamentary clout if a revolt against him were to bring an early national election.
Posted by:Fred

#6  the main problem with getting Olmert to quit is that his political party is almost as unpopular as he is.
Posted by: mhw   2007-05-03 12:45  

#5  I always understood the president of Israel was intended to be a figurehead having tea with foreign heads of state, like the king of England. His power is to lie in his moral authority... but I could be wrong.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-03 12:41  

#4  IIUC only if the govt doesnt have a majority, not just cause he thinks it shouldnt.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-05-03 11:14  

#3  Can the Israeli president sack the PM and/or disband parliament (Knesset)? I know presidents in some systems have that power.
Posted by: Spot   2007-05-03 10:48  

#2  i gotta disagree Fred.

Polls from a couple of weeks ago were showing Bibi winning in a walk against OLMERT AND PERETZ. Change leadership of either Kadima or Labour, and the respective parties do pretty well.

Face it, Israel is gonna HAVE to make peace with SOME pals, at some point, and on terms Likud (minus Kadima) will never accept (Bibi wont come right out and say HE wont accept them, hes like that, but when push comes to shove he wont, or at least most Israelis on both sides assume he wont) And the majority of Israelis know that. And of that majority, a huge number dont trust Labor to do the negotiating, and a fortiori dont trust Meretz.

Whats that leave? Kadima.

Kadima aint going anywhere, unless Likud moves substantially back toward the center, and I dont see that happening, too much gnashing of teeth on the part of the Likud base, even Bibi couldnt pull it off.

I think the real reason that Kadima is holding on, is they dont think Livni can hold the coalition together. Shes too dovish for Leiberman (which isnt saying shes all that dovish) and Shas, a an ultraO religious party is antsy about a woman PM, IIUC. That would force new elections, and that would mean fewer seats for Kadima. They would survive, but as a smaller party, with fewer ministries, possibly junior in a cabinet to either Labour or Likud.

Why theres no votes for no confidence. Well its not just Kadima that doesnt want elections yet. Shas and Leiberman apparently dont either. And Labour is about to have its own primary. I think theyd like to get through that first, and then survey the ground.

OTOH, if calling for new elections looks like a winning issue, Labour could change real fast.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-05-03 10:22  

#1  Start by ignoring your peacenik wife.
Posted by: gorb   2007-05-03 01:17  

00:00