You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Why Ahmadinejad Wants a New Labor Law for Iran
2007-04-28
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad appears determined to confront IranÂ’s increasingly restive labor movement.
Soaring unemployment, depressed wages, main street merchants aren't making money, and whatever isn't nailed down is being boosted by the Mad Mullahs -- yup, that would cause some unrest.
The showdown, begun last year, could reach a peak next week with government plans to crush International Labor Day demonstrations on May 1 by illegal trade unions. The Islamic republic has always associated May 1 with leftist ideologies and has tried to promote an alternative “Islamic Labor Day” on May 2.

This year, however, a number of illegal trade unions have announced they would hold May 1 demonstrations in Tehran and 20 provincial capitals. The newly created WorkersÂ’ Organizations and Activists Coordination Council (WOACC), a grouping of over 80 illegal trade unions claiming a total membership of over a million in 22 cities, is leading the move.

The WOACC emerged in the wake of strikes by Tehran transport workers that brought the capital to a standstill last year. The authorities succeeded to end the strike with a mixture of mass arrests and wage concessions. However, the example set in Tehran spread to other cities and industries.

The rising labor movement started with local grievances linked to wages and working conditions. In the past few months, however, it has developed a broader consciousness by highlighting issues that concern most workers. One issue that has brought the hitherto scattered illegal unions together is their opposition to President AhmadinejadÂ’s proposed new Islamic Labor Code. The text proposed by Ahmadinejad cancels virtually all the rights that working people have won throughout the world over centuries of social struggle and political reform. It abolishes the legal minimum wage in favor of rates fixed through agreement by employers and employees.

It also allows for the generalization of verbal employment contracts, gives employers the right to hire and fire as they please, and makes legal holidays, sick leave, and pension schemes conditional to agreements on a case-by-case basis. At the same time, it imposes a ban on independent trade unions. Instead, it proposes the creation of Islamic Guidance Councils to promote “Islamic values and sensibilities” among workers.
All of which makes clear that the Mad Mullahs, whatever their religious piety, understand the economic principles of fascism and national socialsim. The private employers are permitted to stay open on pain of doing exactly as they're told, including handing over the keys when demanded. The workers are permitted to live as long as they behave.

Now, you'd think the international progressive Left would be up in arms about this given their solidarity with the working masses. You'd be wrong.
In a detailed critique of the proposed text, the WOACC shows that the new code violates the Islamic republic’s constitution, Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and accords Iran has signed with the ILO over decades. “The proposed text is a charter for slavery disguised as an Islamic code,” a WOACC spokesman in Tehran said over the telephone last week.
Slavery is too strong a word, as is serfdom. It's fascism -- to label it correctly is to understand how it will have to be brought down.

Slavery was brought down mostly by moral and political suasion -- only in America did it require a major war. Likewise serfdom collapsed as a result of economic and political pressure -- it wasn't feasible anymore so it went away.

But fascism has always required a war to be removed.
That view is shared by some members of the Islamic Consultative Majlis who criticize Ahmadinejad for refusing to submit his text to normal parliamentary procedures. Instead, the Ministry of Labor is trying to railroad the draft law through a Majlis committee controlled by pro-Ahmadinejad parliamentarians.
Fascist dictators don't usually use a restive parliament to get things done ...
AhmadinejadÂ’s confrontational style in dealing with the labor movement has also been criticized by some top mullahs within the regime.

Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi, the Islamic chief justice, has warned that the government’s repressive approach could destabilize the regime. Former President Hashemi-Rafsanjani, a mullah-cum-businessman who heads the powerful Expediency Council, has called for “sensitivity” in dealing with what may be the most serious challenge the regime has faced in years.
Both of them understand how they came to power in the first place -- the tipping point against the Shah was when the small city/small town merchants were repressed to the point that they couldn't do business any more. When they went over to Khomineni, it was the end for the Shah.
Why is Ahmadinejad so determined to defy a grass-root workersÂ’ movement by imposing an unpopular law? Part of the answer may lie in the massive privatization scheme that Ahmadinejad is expected to unveil this year. According to government sources, 44 state-owned conglomerates will be put on sale at a total price of $18 billion. These businesses employ an estimated 3.5 million people across the country. A majority of likely buyers will be mullahs and their associates, operating through supposedly religious and charitable foundations, along with officers of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
So the thugs in charge enrich themselves while making sure that the now-private businesses are controlled by the government authorities. Gullible Y'urp-peons will loan these 'private' businesses money which will further enrich the mullahs.
Although potential gold mines, most of the businesses concerned have been losing money for years, because of inefficient management and corruption. They also suffer from the fact that they have had to employ far too many people, often because of nepotism and favor distribution by powerful figures of the regime.
Which will continue because the same people will be in charge.
Under the existing Labor Code, it would be difficult for the new owners to downsize the labor force or close loss-making units. The new Labor Code would give future owners carte blanche to reorganize the businesses. According to unofficial estimates, a million people could lose their jobs under privatization. “Ahmadinejad is laying the banquet table for a big feast of plunder,” says the WOACC spokesman.
Not just plunder but control -- do as we say or the factory in your town closes. And then you'll depend on alms.
The situation is further complicated by UN-imposed sanctions that are starting to bite. Dozens of small businesses have already closed down or reduced their activities for want of credit facilities, imported parts and raw material, and fears of being shut out of foreign markets. The thousands of workers who have lost their jobs as a result plan to be in the vanguard of the May 1 demonstrations.
Posted by:Classer

#9  Wonder if Ahmadinnerjacket is getting Chinese advice in addition to everything else?
Posted by: Pappy   2007-04-28 23:14  

#8  PS: Does anyone else see this as a possible "retirement plan" for the mullahs? Appropriate every profitable enterprise before it's all shot out from underneath their feet.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-04-28 22:12  

#7  Oh, the utopian joys of living under Islamic theocracy.

According to government sources, 44 state-owned conglomerates will be put on sale at a total price of $18 billion. These businesses employ an estimated 3.5 million people across the country. A majority of likely buyers will be mullahs and their associates, operating through supposedly religious and charitable foundations, along with officers of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Although potential gold mines, most of the businesses concerned have been losing money for years, because of inefficient management and corruption. They also suffer from the fact that they have had to employ far too many people, often because of nepotism and favor distribution by powerful figures of the regime.


Which, as phil_b so astutely noted, is the precise model of what happened in communist China. Thereby resulting in insider bank loans to prop up tottering outmoded factories and corporate featherbeds that have grown to a potential one trillion dollars worth of bad debt.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-04-28 22:10  

#6  It's the nature of a tyrant to push till it breaks.
I'll enjoy watching the end result on Fox. Throngs of Iranians, foaming at the mouth, storming the govt. buildings and mosques.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-04-28 11:27  

#5  Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-04-28 10:39  

#4  Economic weakness in Iran might just give us the lever we need to overthrow Ahmadinejad if we have any PsyOps influence at our disposal.
Posted by: Zebulon Unating8007   2007-04-28 03:58  

#3  The Iranian regime is explicitly modelled on the Soviet Communist system. It's interesting they are now going down the Chinese Communist road (and post Soviet Russian road) of selling off state assets to party insiders. It will certainly boost economic growth but at the cost of social unrest.
Posted by: phil_b   2007-04-28 03:44  

#2  In this case, really it isn't 'Islam'. Think of it as Sandanista-Nicaragua with black turbans, with this oligarchy is using ol'Mo as a cover rather than ol' Karl.
Posted by: Pappy   2007-04-28 01:03  

#1  It would be nice if our major enemies (Islam and Leftism) would start fighting each other.
Posted by: Jackal   2007-04-28 00:25  

00:00