| Submit your comments on this article |
| Fifth Column |
| Pelosi, Lantos May go to Iran (ok_ as long as they don't try to come back) |
| 2007-04-11 |
| Posted by:Cholung Jolumble2692 |
| #22 Okay, I'll bite, methought HILLARY was considering BILL to be SecSTATE or SecGEN OF THE UNO. i.e. "Bill could rule the World" or words to that efect, ala LUCIANNE/FREEREPUBLIC weeks back. NANCY to replace CONDI??? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-04-11 23:43 |
| #21 Maybe we can get Iran or Russia to lend an airplane. |
| Posted by: Jackal 2007-04-11 21:45 |
| #20 SanFranNan, Before winging off to iran, how's about submitting the "official transcripts" (and gov travel claim particulars) related to your last little unofficial ego-junket? "Loganize 'em, Danno"! ---(yeah, like that would ever happen) |
| Posted by: Asymmetrical T 2007-04-11 21:14 |
| #19 Pelose and Lantos are champions of peace. Muslims accept their message of intolerance and open arms to Muslim immigrants (liberators) or the terror prison of America. Caliphate Now! |
| Posted by: Adnan for Osama 2007-04-11 18:48 |
| #18 A dumb and dangerous granny recognisable as such anywhere else except in the Leftistsphere. |
| Posted by: Duh! 2007-04-11 16:27 |
| #17 When you sit down to negotiate with evil, exactly what do you plan to offer up? Bingo! What sort of "dialogue" succeeds with those whose sole intent is to kill you in the largest numbers possible? Pelosi is simply incapable of comprehending that evil exists and that it is not to be brooked. Her Pollyannaish notions that some accomodation can be made with radical Islam is far worse than Chamberlain's appeasement. Nazis still possessed a modicum of rationality. Islam, quite frankly, DOES NOT. How does one reason with those who are entirely unreasonable? When considering Pelosi's inanity, Frank Sinatra's quote about Nancy Reagan springs to mind: "She's dumb. Dumb and dangerous." |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-04-11 16:16 |
| #16 Dunno, but if lived in the Czech Republic, the Rhineland, Austria, or Gdsank, I'd be worried. |
| Posted by: mrp 2007-04-11 15:56 |
| #15 When you sit down to negotiate with evil, exactly what do you plan to offer up? |
| Posted by: eLarson 2007-04-11 13:37 |
| #14 Just a thought, but does the AF have to provide a plane for this boondoggle? Would be interesting to see what happens if the AF were to say that they could not fly into proscribed air space because, 1. It is illegal. and 2. They could not guarantee her safety. |
| Posted by: RWV 2007-04-11 13:25 |
| #13 Steve, that's different. Those men are e-e-evil. Maybe even an axis of evil. |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2007-04-11 12:45 |
| #12 As Angie notes, I'd like to hear whom Pelosi would not talk to: Hitler? Pol Pot? I bet that while she'd talk to any leftist or islamicist thug, she'd draw the line a Pinochet, Somoza, or Botha. Funny how that works. |
| Posted by: Steve White 2007-04-11 12:29 |
| #11 Funny thing, She was the first one to ask for our crucifixion during tail hook, and yet she stands behind us as warriors. Reminds me of donÂ’t ask while IÂ’ll fuck you in the ass policy. |
| Posted by: Joe of the Jungle 2007-04-11 11:55 |
| #10 These idiots would've started a "dialogue" with Hitler. "Granted you must exterminate the old and infirm Jews, but how about the healthy young ones? Can't you just confiscate all their property and expell them from Germany? Let's talk about that..." |
| Posted by: Angie Schultz 2007-04-11 11:42 |
| #9 She has never walked a mile in any of our shoes (boots), let alone shed blood in which we had shed for her ranting; she has a free run of “free speech” (not earned by my blood or my brothers). God bless her for the free ride. |
| Posted by: Joe of the Jungle 2007-04-11 11:24 |
| #8 Enforce the Logan Act. |
| Posted by: doc 2007-04-11 11:00 |
| #7 heh heh heh Dartha better typer than me. I'm just thinking of the photo-ops and November 2008. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2007-04-11 10:50 |
| #6 Oh please keep them. OhpleaseOhpleaseOhpleaseOhpleaseOhpleaseOhplease. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2007-04-11 09:52 |
| #5 IF Lantos, Holocaust survivor, is prepared to challenge DJ to deny the Holocaust right to his face, really pin him to the wall about it, show him the scars and the pain, make DJ squirm and shuffle his feet on Iranian and Arabian teevee, then I cautiously say 'yes'. But we all know that's not on Tom's agenda and certainly not on La Pelosi's, so I emphatically say 'no'. |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2007-04-11 09:46 |
| #4 Some treasons need to be coordinated with face-to-face meetings. I'd call this fairly stupid. Its entirely possible for Iran to think that we would simply 'roll over' like Britain if she is made a 'special guest'. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2007-04-11 08:42 |
| #3 New batch of headscarves, borrow the brooch from Halfbright; I'd say she's all set for the trip... |
| Posted by: Raj 2007-04-11 08:09 |
| #2 Please, please, please, please, please. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2007-04-11 07:49 |
| #1 Pelosi: "But a person of Mr. Lantos' stature and personal experience is saying that -- even as a Holocaust survivor and even recognizing the outrageous statements of the president of Iran -- it's important to have dialogue. I think that speaks volumes." Stupid bitch. The only thing it "speaks volumes" about is the hopelessly infantile nature of liberal thinking. "Dialogue" is not going to deter or prevent these evil monsters from acquiring nuclear weapons, and then using them. The ONLY thing "dialogue" will accomplish is allow idiot liberals like Pelosi to feel good about themselves right up until the moment of detonation. There is a point where stupidity itself becomes a form of evil. The Democratic Party has reached that point. |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2007-04-11 07:33 |