You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Prince Charles Calls for Ban on McDonald's Restaurants and Big Macs
2007-02-28
The Prince of Wales told a nutritionist in Abu Dhabi Tuesday that the “key” to people eating healthily was to ban McDonald’s fast food restaurants. Prince Charles was attending the launch of a public health awareness campaign aimed at fighting diabetes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). He visited the Imperial College London Diabetes Centre and watched as a group of children chose from a selection of “good” and “bad” snacks for their school packed lunches. Talking to Nadine Tayara, a nutritionist from the centre who had put the children through their paces, he asked her: “Have you got anywhere with McDonald’s? Have you tried getting it banned? That’s the key.”

A McDonald’s spokeswoman said that Charles’s remark was “disappointing”. Other members of his family had visited the fast-food chain, she said, and “have probably got a more up-to-date picture of us.” The spokeswoman added: “This appears to be an off-the-cuff remark, in our opinion. It does not reflect our menu or where we are as a business.”

Charles was clearly unaware of some of the moves the company has made, she said, such as improved labelling, supporting sustainable agriculture and nutritional changes with choice and variety. She said that their food would fit into any balanced diet.
Posted by:Fred

#35  #22 beat me to it, vv LUCIANNE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-02-28 22:34  

#34  i wonder how many times the shithead ha eayen McDonalds?
Posted by: sinse   2007-02-28 21:21  

#33  Right. The best approach to nutrition is simply to ignore every single pronouncement on it by 'experts'. One minute they're twatting on about the health-giving properties of fish oils, then a few years later they change their mind and try to sell us some other crap instead. These people need to try getting jobs instead of telling others what to do all the time.
Posted by: Cholutch Crirong6588   2007-02-28 20:39  

#32  In a related development, the BBC reported that
Vitamins 'could shorten lifespan'
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-02-28 18:47  

#31  Has anyone ever eaten a "Wimpy Burger", the Brit's answer to McDonalds? I did - once. Even cow patties can't taste THAT bad. As for fish-n-chips, there was a great little place in the small village I lived in (Raunds, in Northhamptonshire) that had GREAT fish and chips. The best place to eat was the oriental restaurant run by a family from Hong Kong. Great food, and not terribly bad prices. Most British food, in my experience, is bland, tasteless, overcooked and not worth feeding to a starving Doberman. The only good restaurants I visited all served non-British food, and had non-British owners and cooks. Charles needs to get out more.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-02-28 18:02  

#30  English royal trying to oppress the Scots again.
Posted by: DMFD   2007-02-28 17:50  

#29  Yeah, I'm sure Chucky's been in McDonalds a lot...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-02-28 16:28  

#28  This, Britain's next king. What a state the monarchy has gotten to.

Oh, they've had their fair share of oddballs and worse in the past: George III, Richard III, and John come to mind. At least Chuck won't be able to wield any real power if he reigns.
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-02-28 16:24  

#27  Let me get this straight, we are mocking one of the most elite people in the world for acting elitist?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-02-28 14:42  

#26  Back in 2004 there was a staff member of the royal household who wanted to know what she needed to do to get a promotion. Charles' response:

What is wrong with people nowadays? Why do they all seem to think they are qualified to do things far above their capabilities? . . . This is all to do with the learning culture in schools. It is a consequence of a child-centered education system which tells people they can become pop stars, high court judges or brilliant TV presenters . . .

This guy is the poster child for "didn't earn a damn thing in his entire life." He doesn't even understand the concept of "earning" -- whether one earns tangible acqusitions or a reputation. That you actually have to do something to be considered worthy. I am so curious to know what goes on in his head. Does he actually think he's qualified to sit in judgement of anything? Does he think his opinion matters more than others about things like the environment, art, architecture, nutrition, culture, etc -- all the things he's spoken out about?

This, Britain's next king. What a state the monarchy has gotten to. I do love Britain and hate to see his being such a laughing stock. He really needs a good bitch-slapping.
Posted by: PlanetDan   2007-02-28 14:34  

#25  I wonder how he feels about Burger King's offerings, which I believe is a British company?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-02-28 13:20  

#24  Dear Chucky,

Which is the cause of more deaths around the world, Micky Ds or Islam?

Inbred Dhimmi. Now where the hell did I put my McChicken?
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-02-28 13:09  

#23  "Chuck" would seem to be a particularly ill-favored name for a king of the Brits.
Posted by: Fred   2007-02-28 13:08  

#22  Andrew Stuttaford @ National Review:

If there's one thing that mitigates the annoyance of having to witness the antics of the current wave of hair-shirt prophets, it's the hours of harmless fun that their hypocrisy never fails to provide. Only recently, we've had Gore's house to condemn, Feinstein's jets to gawp at, and now, delightfully, we have Prince Charle's pies to savor:

Via the London Evening Standard, we learn that the prince who would ban McDonald's has a few guilty secrets of his own. It turns out that a Big Mac "contains fewer calories, fats and salt than some products in [Charles'] own organic Duchy Originals food range". The horror!
Posted by: Mike   2007-02-28 12:26  

#21  Heard the same theory many times - Chuck's lost popularity due to the Diana fiasco and the conversations with plants - the boys really are well liked by the populace as far as I can tell... and going to fight should boost this further.
Posted by: A Royal Subject   2007-02-28 10:33  

#20  Britons, your input please. My mom is convinced that the Queen made a deal with Charles before he married Camilla: he could do it, on the condition that he renounces/abdicates in favor of Wills upon her death. I'm not so sure, given all his noise about changing his title to "Defender of Faiths," etc.

So, whaddya think -- any hope of such a behind-the-scenes deal?
Posted by: exJAG   2007-02-28 10:30  

#19  Thanks, Chuckie. Check's in the mail...
Posted by: The Ghost of Dave Thomas   2007-02-28 09:43  

#18  I call for a ban on Arthur Treachers!!
Posted by: ARMYGUY   2007-02-28 09:26  

#17  The Last Queen?! Burger Orf.
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-02-28 09:05  

#16  Isn't there some way to pass over this twit for succession to the throne? Seriously, Queen Elizabeth II may very well be that LAST queen of England at this rate.
Posted by: Charles   2007-02-28 08:50  

#15  Good thing he doesn't know about sliders.

On a serious note, why is it the only choice leftists are for is abortion? You can choose to kill your baby, but not to have a big mac. Insane.
Posted by: Spot   2007-02-28 08:17  

#14  I confess, I have a craving for a Big Mac.
Don't throw me in the Tower!
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-02-28 07:12  

#13  Big Macs taste great - you just have to be stoned. (Like HRH is permanently).
Posted by: Howard UK   2007-02-28 06:29  

#12  "What *is* this mad obsession with telling people what to do?"

What it is, is Socialism. That's what Socialism is all about: telling people what to do. They get a kick out of it.
Posted by: Dave D.   2007-02-28 06:27  

#11  Charles, England's answer to Jimmy Carter
Posted by: JFM   2007-02-28 06:23  

#10  Nah, McNails, that's the standard here too.

IMHO, Charlie is fit to be king only if he does the following:

-Divests himself of all stock in Muslim controlled or collaborationist companies.
-Publicly repudiates his Islamophilic statements,
-Publicly burns his Arab costumes, and agrees to dress like a civilized Englishman rather than a Mohammedan cutthroat.
-Agrees to substitute "bloodthirsty saracen" for "Muslim" in all public statements.
-Performs due penance by personally carrying a cross from London to Bladon while dressed in sackcloth, covered in ashes, and flagellating himself with a cat-o'-nine-tails; there to lie prostrate before the grave of Winston Churchill for three days and three nights.
-Gets Camilla's teeth fixed and issues a public apology for letting her wear a weed in her hair at their wedding.

Failing that, there is Republic of Britain a mass movement that seeks to abolish the monarchy. According to them, "much of the population views the succession of Prince Charles with little enthusiasm, including many monarchists."
That is an understatement. Elizabeth II cannot live forever, though her mum (of sainted memory) gave it a good shot, and there are dark forebodings about the succession. Republic's website says that "Now is the time." They could be right.

Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2007-02-28 05:43  

#9  Big Mac's in this country are revolting , perhaps the standard over in the USA is fine , but over here it aint . I would rather eat a bowl of gravel and rainwater. The 'food' is usually served by some little 'chav' with less IQ than the average garden snail .
That being said , Charlie , STFU .
Posted by: MacNails   2007-02-28 04:16  

#8  No worries! He and CPB can dine on tin meat (Bully beef) and biscuits. I'll take his portion of Big Mac's. Bloody "good" and "bad" whahahhaa, what would he and horse face know about that?
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-02-28 03:58  

#7  Elizabeth II must be thinking:"What did I do so horrible to be so punished?"
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-02-28 02:49  

#6  Thank you, Robespîerre, a big thank you.
Posted by: JFM   2007-02-28 02:14  

#5  Very simple: change the McaDonald name to mOdonald and he will recommend, no he will order the British to eat at it. It doesn't evne require to change the "golden arches" symbol.
Posted by: JFM   2007-02-28 02:09  

#4  What about all those locally owned fish and chips emporia? A good serving of the usual fare has enough calories to jump-start a nuclear submarine.

Tastes like greasy cardboard, too. I think the great men of the British past explored and conquered a large part of the world just because they were looking for something decent to eat.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2007-02-28 01:28  

#3  What *is* this mad obsession with telling people what to do? The Brits seem to have a horrible case of it.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-02-28 00:21  

#2  McDonald's calls for ban on inbred royal twits.
Posted by: 3dc   2007-02-28 00:17  

#1  Yah, but he loves halal grub
Posted by: Sneaze   2007-02-28 00:13  

00:00