You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Tony Snow Calls Lead in Today's 'NYT' Iran Editorial 'Dumbest' He's Seen in Awhile
2007-02-14
In his White House press briefings this week, spokesman Tony Snow, amid new charges from the administration and the Pentagon of deadly Iranian activity in Iraq, has nevertheless charged that the press is "overhyping" the possibility of some sort of U.S. plan to attack Iran. Today, after many questions and challenges on this subject, he called the opening a New York Times editorial on this subject today "what may be the dumbest lead of an editorial I've seen in a long time."

Snow said, "You guys have been constantly -- I did see what may be the dumbest lead of an editorial I've seen in a long time today in The New York Times, which is, 'We need to declare ourselves on Iran.' We've declared it over and over -- we're not going to war with them. Let me make that clear. So anybody who is trying to use this as 'the administration trying to lay the predicate for a war with Iran' -- no, we're committed to diplomacy with Iran. But we are also committed to protecting our forces."

The first sentences of the Times' editorial actually read, "Before things get any more out of hand, President Bush needs to make his intentions toward Iran clear. And congress needs to make it clear that this time it will be neither tricked nor bullied into supporting another disastrous war."
Isn't that what Tony said?
Posted by:Fred

#6  How amusing. The New York Times don't care about being accused of lying, because they actually believe their own narrative. But being accused in front of their peers and the world of simple stupidity, when they believe they own the right end of the bell curve? Mr. Snow hit them where it hurts the most!
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-02-14 21:22  

#5  Damn it. The administration must be crystal clear on one thing. They must repeat it over and over again:

"If the US armed forces are ATTACKED by Iran, it is NOT our fault for being in the Middle East!"

Because, again damn it, that is what the left will say if Iran attacks us!

They blame America for everything. They have even blamed us for 911. Well, screw them. If Iran does attack us and starts a war, then it is bloody well THEIR fault, and any leftist Moonbat who says otherwise should get punched in the nose and told to STFU.

But it would be the ultimate humiliation for our country if WE were attacked, the left came out and blamed US for having "provoked" the attack, and then, because NOBODY argued the point with them, the public itself believed that WE were wrong for being attacked!

Wrong, damn it. Wrong. But unless Tony Snow says it, and says it a LOT, you know that this is exactly what is going to happen.

If somebody suggested this to him, at first he would say, "You have got to be kidding. Nobody is that stupid." But a few seconds later, he would agree. The left IS that stupid, and the left IS that anti-American.

And, unfortunately, if the left says that big lie enough times, and it isn't refuted, a lot of the public will believe it.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-02-14 09:37  

#4  lol, Bobby. We must get to the bottom of that love triangle. Actually, on 2nd thought, I'd prefer to leave that one alone.
Posted by: BA   2007-02-14 09:15  

#3  Meanwhile somewhere in Iran there is a Mullah planning to turn the New York Time's building into one big Mosque. Little does he know the liberal traitors there have already done that.

Bet Snow is laughing over his coffee this morning. That car bomb in Iran will make Tony's day.
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-02-14 07:32  

#2  Nice news alert in the pic. What day was that?

The NYT is following the "Have you stopped beating your wife" approach.

Dumb and dumber.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-02-14 06:23  

#1  The NY Times is not above deceit, plagerism, and dishonesty. Is this as dumb as when the NY Times declared Fidel Castro was not a communist, but only an agrarian reformer? Just take it easy, dumber things are coming.
Posted by: whatadeal   2007-02-14 00:27  

00:00