You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghan assembly grants immunity for war crimes
2007-02-02
KABUL - AfghanistanÂ’s parliament has granted immunity to all Afghans involved in the countryÂ’s 25 years of conflict, lawmakers said on Thursday, despite calls by human rights groups for war crimes trials.
Carla del Ponte just poured herself a strong drink ...
The decision passed on Wednesday in the lower house, Wolesi Jirga, would also cover fugitive Taleban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar and former prime minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who now heads his own incompetent militant group, critics and supporters of the move said.
Gul is responsible for more than just the recent chaos, he was the bad boy who pushed Afghanistan into final civil war after the Russkies left.
Rights groups have strongly pressed the government to punish those guilty of abuses, including some members of parliament and senior government officials, saying justice was vital for peace. But the national assembly said its motion would help reconciliation in a nation shattered by years of war and civil strife that have left almost no family untouched by tragedy. “In order to bring reconciliation among various strata in the society, all those political and belligerent sides who were involved one way or the other during the 2-”decades of war will not be prosecuted legally and judicially,” the motion passed by the assembly says.

The United Nations in Kabul objected immediately. “For any process of national reconciliation to succeed, the suffering of victims must be acknowledged and impunity tackled,” it said in a statement. “No one has the right to forgive those responsible for human rights violations other than the victims themselves.”
Who are represented by a government, who just decided to forgive them. And who exactly are you to talk about who does the forgiving -- who elected you?
The Wolesi Jirga elected in late 2005 includes former senior communist officials, ex-Mujahideen (holy warrior) leaders who fought the Soviets and some former Taleban.

“In a way, this provides immunity for all,” Shukria Barakzai, a leading woman activist MP, told Reuters. She was among a small group of delegates who left the session in protest.

Haji Mohammad Mohaqiq, a former Mujahideen leader who was among the key legislators behind the amnesty, said it was in line with Karzai’s efforts to push national reconciliation. He also believed the immunity would cover Omar and Hekmatyar. “This is a law and the law will be implemented on all individuals equally,” he told Reuters.

The decision was approved days after Karzai again indicated he could consider talks with Taleban leaders to end the bloodshed after the countryÂ’s most violent year since the TalebanÂ’s ouster. One of KarzaiÂ’s advisers on Wednesday clarified talks would not be held with the Taleban as a political, ideological or military group.
I personally think it's a mistake, but I'm sitting in my comfortable study in the States, not in Afghanistan, so I'm really not in a position to judge. Sure would like to see Omar and Gul have work accidents in the real near future.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Afghanistan is too big, its population is too spread out and its economy is too small to stand against terrorists on its own. Its doomed to be a terrorist haven or one of the biggest welfare countries on the planet. I think its time to rethink the strategy there.
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-02-02 19:45  

#3  like i said yesterday, Afghanistan is just another subdivision of Pakistan; we need to level the whole damn place.. from sea to shining sea.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-02-02 14:16  

#2  immunity on WHAT? Surely if say, Gulbudin walks into a bank in Kabul and robs it tomorrow, hes not immune.

If I read this right, it doesnt exempt Omar for continued war now, nor would it protect him from transfer to the US for 9/11. I think its more about insuring Hek that he wont be persecuted for bombing Kabul back in the '90s, and that lower level guys wont be tried for stuff they did then.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2007-02-02 13:01  

#1  I am absolutely furious by this and other political moves this week in Afganistan . To top it all off , I have just read about this , and that does truely rip at the gut as an ex-serviceman .
Posted by: MacNails   2007-02-02 08:46  

00:00