You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Tribal areas should be brought under system of laws: Benazir
2006-12-21
Former prime minister Benazir Bhutto has said that PakistanÂ’s tribal areas need to be brought under a system of laws and representation to empower people of these areas, and allow them to be independent of Afghan-Arab fighters who dominate their society.

In an interview with the German daily Junge Welt, Ms Bhutto talked about issues related to the Taliban, tribal areas and the Charter of Democracy and her plans to return to Pakistan. She said that it should be recognised that the Taliban went to war with the world under a military dictatorship in Pakistan in 2001. She said that until military dictatorship in Pakistan ended, “the environment that nourishes the Taliban and their sympathisers will continue to grow in strength”.

She asked Islamabad to work closely with Kabul to stop infiltrations into Afghanistan. “A resurrection of their (Taliban) regime in Kabul will covertly bring back Al Qaeda, and the world will be back to square one,” she said.

Ms Bhutto said that Islamabad also needed to reform its security apparatus and end the “duality of control” that currently existed and bring them under the control of parliament and the prime minister. The Pakistani foreign minister recently said in Kabul he was not denying that people were coming to Afghanistan from across the border, she said, adding that this statement proved that the military dictatorship was “unable” to establish the writ of the government in Pakistan. Ms Bhutto said that on the other hand, a political government was able to establish its writ in the tribal areas towards the end of the 1980s, when narcotics lords ran mafias similar to those of the Taliban.
Posted by:Fred

#5  She is as full of shit as the next one...all hat and no cattle. She was a corrupt a-hole as PM. Didn't do spit to improve the country. Talk is utterly cheap. She doesn't have the spine nor the support to do squat about the tribal areas. Only repeated B52/B1/B2 strikes have that power.
Posted by: remoteman   2006-12-21 15:24  

#4  Because though she couldn't/wouldn't do it either, it still is a handy way to bash her political opponents?
Posted by: James   2006-12-21 12:39  

#3  Im not sure Bhutto would be a big improvement, but I wouldnt dismiss her out of hand either.

I'm pretty much with you on that.
Posted by: Shipman   2006-12-21 11:47  

#2  cause the US wasnt pushing for it then?

cause all the arab fighters were in Afghanistan then?

Im not sure Bhutto would be a big improvement, but I wouldnt dismiss her out of hand either.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-12-21 11:41  

#1  So why didn't Ms. Bhutto do so when she was in charge?
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-12-21 09:44  

00:00