| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Reid OK's Temporary Troop Surge |
| 2006-12-17 |
| no comment Incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Sunday he would support a temporary troop increase in Iraq only if it were part of a broader strategy to bring combat forces home by early 2008. “If the commanders on the ground said this is just for a short period of time, we'll go along with that,” said Reid, D-Nev., citing a time frame such as two months to three months. But a period longer than that, such as 18 months to 24 months, would be unacceptable, he said. “The American people will not allow this war to go on as it has. It simply is a war that will not be won militarily. It can only be won politically,” Reid said. “We have to change course in Iraq.” President Bush is considering several options for a new strategy in Iraq, such as a proposal backed by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., that would send tens of thousands of additional troops for an indefinite period to quickly secure Baghdad. There are about 134,000 U.S. troops in Iraq now. That plan would run counter to recommendations by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, which set a goal of withdrawing combat troops by early 2008 in support of more aggressive regional diplomacy. Retired Gen. Jack Keane, a former Army vice chief of staff who is advising Bush to send an additional 30,000 to 40,000 U.S. troops, said it would take at least 1 1/2 years to secure Iraq. “It's impossible,” Keane said, responding to Reid's suggestion that the troop surge be limited to two months to three months. “It will take a couple of months just to get forces in,” he said. Bush's former secretary of state, Colin Powell, said he was skeptical that any type of troop surge would be effective, noting that ultimately it is the Iraqis who must stand up and stop their growing sectarian violence. “It is the D.C. police force that guards Washington, D.C., not the troops that are stationed at Fort Myer. And in Baghdad, you need a police force to do that,” Powell said. “So, before I would add any additional troops or recommend it to a commander in chief, I'd want to make sure we have a clear understanding of what it is they're going for, how long they're going for.” Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, who is on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said there would be widespread opposition by members of his committee if Bush proposes a troop increase. “We have to understand that there is absolute chaos that is taking place there. This country is falling apart,” Kennedy said. Regarding a temporary troop surge, Kennedy said, “I respect Harry Reid on it, but that's not where I am.” Reid and Keane spoke on ABC's “This Week,” Kennedy appeared on “Fox News Sunday,” and Powell spoke on CBS' “Face the Nation.” |
| Posted by:Frank G |
| #9 So its NOT TARAH. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-12-17 22:16 |
| #8 Proving that Harry Reid is an idiot who thinks Americans are just as stupid as he, Reid said “The American people will not allow this war to go on as it has. It simply is a war that will not be won militarily. It can only be won politically. We have to change course in Iraq.” Harry you dickwad, that should read the macaca media will not allow this etc., etc. Just because you, Harry and your pals in the macaca have framed the war in such a way doesn't mean the American people have eaten your ball of shit. Buy a clue. |
| Posted by: wxjames 2006-12-17 20:21 |
| #7 Hay FOBBITS your about to get some company. Besoeker you should stake out your ground now before the REMFs come and demand some space. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-12-17 19:19 |
| #6 General Keane ... General Reid. General Keane ... General Reid. I can't make up my mind. |
| Posted by: Perfesser 2006-12-17 18:30 |
| #5 Emperor of Clark County™ isn't good enuf for you? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2006-12-17 18:07 |
| #4 When did Reid become Commander in Chief? |
| Posted by: Parabellum 2006-12-17 18:04 |
| #3 “The American people will not allow this war to go on as it has. It simply is a war that will not be won militarily. It can only be won politically,” Reid said. "In order to win politically, we must surrender militarily." |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2006-12-17 17:54 |
| #2 I bet the Iraqis will just be thrilled with Fat Rich Kid's assessment of their country as falling apart. In season, maybe they could send him a bushel basket full of figs, to let them know what they think. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2006-12-17 16:44 |
| #1 Ripper Reid has spoken. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2006-12-17 16:34 |