You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Democratic Nat'l C'tee denies meeting with Hamas
2006-12-08
Stacie Paxton, Press Secretary for the US Democratic National Committee, denied reports on Thursday that Hamas leaders had met secretly with US Democratic Party officials.
"Nope. Nope. Never happened."
"Who're you going to believe, us Democrats or Hamas?"
The Bethlehem-based Maan News Agency, quoting sources close to the Hamas-led government, claimed Wednesday that such meetings did take place. However, the agency did not give additional details. In response to the reports, which were also published in The Jerusalem Post, Paxton said: "No such meeting took place."
Posted by:Fred

#10  D *** ng it, what kind of VIETNAM QUAGMIRE is this WOT - at least the Dems should do is have the common decency to secretly meet wid NVA-VC = HAMAS, etc officials in Paris or Vienna, to make sure Amer loses Vietnam while spending a lot of $$$ in the process. IFF THE DEMS ARE GONNA BE CALLIN' VIETNAM + QUAGMIRE, AT LEAST FOLLOW THE HISTORICAL SCRIPT.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-12-08 20:25  

#9  #6 Shucks, Pappy.

The IRA married into the Democratic Party (Paul Hill/Mary Courtney Kennedy). The Reception must've been a hell of a piss up!

Posted by: JDB   2006-12-08 14:14  

#8  ...Does anybody remember former House Speaker Tom Foley's comments about Bush 41 about his role in the Iran-Contra scandal?
Let me refresh everyone's memory. The Iran-Contra special prosecutor actually suggested that VP Bush got in an SR-71 and flew to Paris to meet with the MMMs and then come back in less than a day. When the USAF turned over the flight logs and let these idiots interview the flight and ground crews, the SPs office stated that there was no evidence that any such flight had ever taken place. Foley's response:

"Despite the fact there is no evidence, the seriousness of charge demands that we investigate."

I second Speaker Foley.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-12-08 13:51  

#7  We'll find out sometime after John Kerry fully publicly releases his unabridged military records.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2006-12-08 09:56  

#6  More like it wast Democrats 'not acting in an official capacity'. Like they did with the IRA.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-12-08 09:33  

#5  Possibly Hamas met with some friends and financers of some of the terrorist apologist wing (e.g., Jim McDermott)
Posted by: mhw   2006-12-08 08:28  

#4  Unless you got a tape, *credible* eyewitness, or a video to prove a meetiing took place this is a hard sell. I'd love to see hard evidence. It would damn the dems.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2006-12-08 08:26  

#3  What possible reason could Hamas have to make such a bizarre claim? No, methinks it do have some truth to it. Maybe not an "official" meeting, but a meeting none the less.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-12-08 08:23  

#2  Hard call, but I think it at least marginally more likely that Hamas is lying.
Posted by: Mike   2006-12-08 06:50  

#1  And if you did meet with Hamas, what would you tell us then?
Posted by: Bobby   2006-12-08 06:20  

00:00