You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
SOP: Ex-Pelosi chief of staff: Dems to target big business
2006-11-30
The former chief of staff to incoming U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, speaking in Atlanta on Wednesday, warned companies not to expect smooth sailing in the new Democrat-controlled Congress.

George Crawford, currently an advisor in the Washington, D.C. office of Atlanta-based law firm King & Spalding LLP, joined former U.S. Sens. Daniel Coats (R-Ill.) and Connie Mack (R-Fla.) and partner Thomas Spulak for a Nov. 29 forum on what businesses should expect from the new majority.

Crawford and the other panel members told King & Spalding clients that Democrats will move quickly to investigate large corporations, particularly those in the energy and pharmaceutical sectors. "Business is going to have to earn what they get out of this Democratic Congress," Crawford said.
I think that's a reference to campaign contributions, don't you?
Spulak, who served as House general counsel under Tom Foley, the last Democratic speaker, said the party will use committee debates to highlight what it sees as breeches of the public trust by the administration and the private sector, especially when it comes to drug prices, oil company profits and post-Hurricane Katrina insurance rates.

With the party's agenda driven in no small part by its liberal base, count on Democrats to make a lot of noise about how companies "have taken advantage of the American public," Spulak said.

Corporations also will have less access to lawmakers than in previous years, as Pelosi is expected to slap strict new rules on lobbyists to eliminate the "culture of corruption" Democrats claim Republicans allowed to grow under their leadership. To counter the coming storm, Crawford and Spulak suggest businesses ramp up their public relations efforts in order to get equal time for their arguments in the media.

When not directly attacking big business, Democrats will push for an increase in the minimum wage, altering the alternative minimum tax to benefit the middle class, more government-run health care, stem cell research and environmental issues, according to the panel.

"The impression that we're working together won't last too long," said Mack, a senior policy advisor at the firm and former chairman of President George Bush's federal tax reform advisory committee.
Killing the Golden Goose is always on the DhimmiDonk agenda.
Posted by:.com

#8  "Business is going to have to earn what they get out of this Democratic Congress," Crawford said.

Translation: We're raising congressional minimum bribes wage!
Posted by: Elmert Crosh5077   2006-11-30 22:46  

#7  repealing the Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act

Nice suggestion, but doubtful given the incestuous relationship between Hollywood and the Democrats.

I'm too lazy to go an find it again, but someone was refering to Nancy as Pelosium-2007 due to her toxic nature. That's a snark!
Posted by: SteveS   2006-11-30 18:00  

#6  tu, hopefully aboard AirZim, right? He'll never make it off the mainland then.
Posted by: BA   2006-11-30 11:10  

#5  Maybe she can fly Mugabe in as an economic advisor.
Make sure they do it right, y'know?
Posted by: tu3031   2006-11-30 10:39  

#4  Who cares about copyrights?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-11-30 10:37  

#3  How about showing your distain for the influence and bribing of ‘big corporationsÂ’ by repealing the Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act and returning the length of copyright back to 30 years? Dare you. The founding fathers loath the royal patents which gave families perpetual income off of levies laid upon products, so they specifically limited the time to thirty years. Hollyweird and the big entertainment industry put enough gold in everyoneÂ’s reelection funds in the 90s to get copyright renewable to 100 years. Basically, not different than selling great expanses of public land [in this case public domain] to big corps. Unthinkable in the dialectic of the party propaganda isnÂ’t it? So letÂ’s start there.
Posted by: Procopius2K   2006-11-30 10:04  

#2  It's part of their commitment to creating more small businesses.

Step 1: Take 300 big businesses...
Posted by: Jackal   2006-11-30 09:12  

#1  O'REILLY on FOX > AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES DONATE MORE TO NEEDY PROGS despite not having the massive entitlements available to others in foreign, mostly Socialist nations. FURTHER, So-called SOCIAL PROGRESSIVES = LIBERALS [Liberal Socialists?] like to rant about problems as long as they don't spend any of their own $$$.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-30 01:13  

00:00